Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Meh. I understand why he went and don't blame him. I just think the timing was lousy (and Chelsea FFS!!!???)


I don't think he'll play on Sunday. I reckon a deal has been agreed on the quiet. I'm hoping so at least. Stamford Bridge is one of the most unlpeasant aways at the best of times.

yup,absolutely. Baker's show was a hymn to the idiocy of our devotion to our football teams and the world of fandom. 606 since then has largely just been fans with various degrress of madness ranting boringly on about their team and applying d-level punditry skills to their analysis.


Baker's 606 used to have features like Bearded 11s or How have you best got into a match for free - they're just tedious drivel nowadays

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I don't think he'll play on Sunday. I reckon a

> deal has been agreed on the quiet. I'm hoping so

> at least. Stamford Bridge is one of the most

> unlpeasant aways at the best of times.



The chat in the media was that Liverpool asked Chelsea to do this and they refused....

nervous times for arsenal now but if the sending off was harsh the two penalties fully deserve a Fabregas "who did you pay" type question. Genuinely, properly scandalous decisions. Not to mention the yellow for our keeper


I'm not paranoid normally but these decisions have genuinely perplexed me

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...