Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Meh. I understand why he went and don't blame him. I just think the timing was lousy (and Chelsea FFS!!!???)


I don't think he'll play on Sunday. I reckon a deal has been agreed on the quiet. I'm hoping so at least. Stamford Bridge is one of the most unlpeasant aways at the best of times.

yup,absolutely. Baker's show was a hymn to the idiocy of our devotion to our football teams and the world of fandom. 606 since then has largely just been fans with various degrress of madness ranting boringly on about their team and applying d-level punditry skills to their analysis.


Baker's 606 used to have features like Bearded 11s or How have you best got into a match for free - they're just tedious drivel nowadays

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I don't think he'll play on Sunday. I reckon a

> deal has been agreed on the quiet. I'm hoping so

> at least. Stamford Bridge is one of the most

> unlpeasant aways at the best of times.



The chat in the media was that Liverpool asked Chelsea to do this and they refused....

nervous times for arsenal now but if the sending off was harsh the two penalties fully deserve a Fabregas "who did you pay" type question. Genuinely, properly scandalous decisions. Not to mention the yellow for our keeper


I'm not paranoid normally but these decisions have genuinely perplexed me

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...