Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only slight disappointment yesterday for me, was

> the fact we didn't use our new striker. Would've

> loved it if he could've scored.


I'd have thought that not having to use him made it an even better win.

I was only half paying attention yesterday so at one point when I'd woken up I reached the conclusion Lampard wasn't playing. Finally I saw him. He can't have been much involved though.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still, at least we weren't 4 goals clear....;)



At least we didn't lose to team bottom of premier league, and our side doesn't "boast" a player on ?250K a week. What great value for money he's provided for his clubs investment.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha. I think being four up and only getting a

> point is a bit more gutting. It seems whatever you

> are paying your team it's not enough to defend a

> four goal lead.



Still didn't lose to bottom club, and still don't pay over the odds for players. Lead now only four points and the Mancs have got to play us, Chavski, and Liverpool.

Well, I guess we'll see. I think there's a few in your team who you've paid over the odds for. Rosicky, Arshavin, Bendtner for example. The Arsenal have had an excellent season and looking back over the results they've had they are unlucky to be second. It's going to be an interesting run in.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, I guess we'll see. I think there's a few in

> your team who you've paid over the odds for.

> Rosicky, Arshavin, Bendtner for example. The

> Arsenal have had an excellent season and looking

> back over the results they've had they are unlucky

> to be second. It's going to be an interesting run

> in.


We'll see indeed.

CELTIC could be set to lose one of their top players as Manchester United prepare a summer swoop for defender Emilio Izaguirre, according to reports.


The Honduran international impressed during last year?s World Cup in South Africa and has been on the radar of some top clubs ever since.


Manchester United manager Sir Alex Ferguson was at Ibrox for Sunday?s Scottish Cup tie between the Old Firm casting his eye over Izaguirre and it?s now believed he will track him for the rest of the season as a long-term replacement for Patrice Evra

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Man Utd Mayfair Office

>

> Man Utd's global commercial department is having

> to move to bigger offices at a rent of just under

> ?1m a year to accommodate their team of 45

> employees!


What? No offices in Manchester?

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Annasfield Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still in the same City though Jah.

> >

> > Any club having their office over 200 miles

> away

> > does seem a bit daft.

>

>

> True dat, well in Anna.


Erm, it's the corporate office...sponsorship, global client stuff. The club administration is still at OT and Carrington. Maybe you should read the article rather than just picking out random words that suit your (rather poor) joke.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...