Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick, when you know full well that that is

> going

> > to get a rise out of Emerson, what is the

> point,

> > other than to antagonise?

> >

>

>

If you can dish it out you should be able to take

> it. My personal view is that anyone who can get

> annoyed about football banter needs to take a good

> look at themselves.



See I basically agree with that. But when you know full well that it does wind someone up, I just dont see the point.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > More than aware of these "epitahs", since I've

> > followed the club since 68, unlike Tick Tac who

> > changes allegiances to suit his mood. Proper

> plum.

> > If I were to come out with the dross that he

> trots

> > out, I'd be told to be less antagonistic and

> > confrontational, he, on the other hand, is seen

> as

> > a bit of a joker. The man is hilarious, just

> like

> > his clubs exploits in the CMPL, ooops sorry, I

> > forgot that they aren't in it any more. Now I

> > promise to leave it, provided Victoria Plum

> drops

> > it.

>

>

>

> When Henrik rode into town and took your one

> chance of the big cup....

>

>

>

>

Obviously you won't let it lie, so let me ask you this. Was he playing for a scots club at the time? The only person on here that needs to take a long hard look at himself is you. I have no respect for the likes of you who readily admit he changed allegiances, because they are a "bigger" club. Yeah course they are, you tube. Big fish in a very small pond, nothing more nothing less. Now over to you.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> ..or 4-0 and u fooked it up to be precise.

>

> But that really is a bit of fun innit. Eight-nil.


I ain't got a problem with that, because its true, but I ain't having some numpty banging on about a players performance that wasn't playing for his (second) club at the time, but has an association with said club. The fella obviously needs his lunch time bevvy.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought MM changed his team according to who he

> had money on that season? His heart's always in

> Scotland, his head is where ever his wallet is.

> That's fair enough if you ask me.


What a sound chap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...