Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted

Stoke boss Tony Pulis believes Demba Ba is an accident waiting to happen after West Ham agreed a three-and-a-half-year deal for the Senegal striker. Ba's ?7.1m move to Stoke collapsed when he failed a medical because of a knee injury, and Pulis said he could not have gone through with the deal in good faith.


No sour grapes there then.

????

????

Posted
Posted

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stoke boss Tony Pulis believes Demba Ba is an

> accident waiting to happen after West Ham agreed a

> three-and-a-half-year deal for the Senegal

> striker. Ba's ?7.1m move to Stoke collapsed when

> he failed a medical because of a knee injury, and

> Pulis said he could not have gone through with the

> deal in good faith.

>

> No sour grapes there then.



If he just scores one more goal for us and it keeps us up it's money well spent!

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted

I wondered how much of a risk West Ham were taking given Stoke had turned him down because of his knee problem, but if he continues with his 'shoot on sight'* policy, should go a long way towards saving West Ham. And yes, Pulis is probably bitter about a couple of results going against him of late.


* insert cheap Ashley Cole joke of choice here.

????

????

Posted
Posted

kpc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wondered how much of a risk West Ham were taking

> given Stoke had turned him down because of his

> knee problem, but if he continues with his 'shoot

> on sight'* policy, should go a long way towards

> saving West Ham. And yes, Pulis is probably bitter

> about a couple of results going against him of

> late.

>

> * insert cheap Ashley Cole joke of choice here.



Pulis is Hedging in case of two Ba hatricks in their two games against us coming up

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted

???? Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------->

>

> Pulis is Hedging in case of two Ba hatricks in

> their two games against us coming up


Can only presume that as Carew is on loan his dodgy knees weren't subject to a medical.


Forgot you had two games against them - Britannia Stadium's such a nice place to visit.

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So who do you think will be relegated. These are

> my guesses:

>

> Wigan

> Blackpool &

> Blackburn

>

> More B's than W's. Mind you Birmingham need to be

> careful.

>

> Any more guesses?


Dead right we need to be careful. Too many players carrying knocks for too long and today was a very bad day at the office (cliche no.33 in a series of...). Rumours we are prepared to throw our FAC QF at home against Bolton next week (obviously not official rumours).


Wigan yep. Wolves and Blackburn the other two.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted
You Hammers fans should beware of Tottenham Hotspur losing to Wolves tomorrow. These are the sort of fixtures that are our particular type of banana skin especially as some of the players may well be thinking about the AC Milan game next week. Obviously, I'm sincerely hoping we win both but I know only too well what we're like.
citizenED

citizenED

Posted
Posted
Good to see that, according to the BBC website, Rooney decided to administer his own punsishment for that latest act of thuggery; "Last month Manchester United striker Wayne Rooney went unpunished by referee Mark Clattenburg after appearing to elbow Wayne Rooney for elbowing Wigan's James McCarthy."
Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think you underestimate Wolves JL. I think

> they've been good for a lot of the season without

> getting the results they deserved.



Ummm... Narnia go back and read my post again. I'm certainly not underestimating them.

Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Narnia Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I think you underestimate Wolves JL. I think

> > they've been good for a lot of the season

> without

> > getting the results they deserved.

>

>

> Ummm... Narnia go back and read my post again. I'm

> certainly not underestimating them.


I think you should read your post again Jah.Banana skin suggests a superiority complex. Wolves are better than that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Blah Blah
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Jules-and-Boo
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Jules-and-Boo · Posted

      Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • snowy
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By snowy · Posted

      That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...