Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> StraferJack Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > twitter essentially - but from sources who tend

> to

> > be reliable on this sort of thing

>

> Which sources Jack?


Joey Barton? :))

Roy Hodgson has left Ferdinand out his squad completely. Fine. But why include Terry? Bit of a cop out Roy I'm afraid. Nice to see the Ox is being given a chance to show what he can do. Not a bad squad overall, and th fact that nobody really expects Englnad to do wekk MIGHT actually work in thier favour. Comments EDFers?

I don't feel inspired by the selection but pleased to see the Ox.


I'd guess Terry was chosen for his experience. Should England qualify for the next two rounds then they should face Spain but have no chance in beating them. I think it would have been better to blood more youngsters in preparation for the world cup.

Not as many new faces as I thought there would be, but pleased to see AOC in there, and pleased he's made Gerrard captain (and hope it will make him up his game in an England shirt).


Not so pleased to see Downing in there, and amazed Carroll has gotten in to the squad off the back of a couple of good performances at the arse end of the season!

I dunno, given Roy's proclivities I think he could fit neatly into the side better than he has done at Liverpool.

He's yet young and unproven but I think with interntaional experience he could be really good and he's the sort of striker that actually can give pause for thought to a defence.

Carroll obviously in for set pieces in place of Crouch - don't know if he'll feature much after Rooney returns unless he plays really well..


Surprised Joe Cole didn't get a call from the man who signed him for Liverpool, but maybe that's why - even though he's not had a bad season in France... (Harry would have picked him)... surely a better stand-by than Henderson?

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's not much flair in there though there does

> seem to be a dearth of creative midfield players

> in England these days and I'm puzzled as to how

> Downing still gets in the squad. I'd have much

> rather seen Adam Johnson instead.



I dunno how Downing gets into ANY squad. Hopeless.

A shame to see so many of the same old faces in the squad but not really many better players to put in. The problem is Wilshere, Cleverley and maybe Rodwell were all injured so you have to stick with Gerrard, Barry, Lampard, hope Gerrard's form improves.


Could have had Sturridge in the squad rather than Downing and maybe Carrick rather than Barry. Crouch has never done it against the top teams, so Carroll is the best alternative.


Other than Rio v Terry I don't think there is much else to debate. Richards looks great but a few managers, including Mancini, seem to have their reservations.


Shame Harry didn't get the job but perhaps long term Hodgson is the better bet for English football.

Dagleish gone - the red shite needs to snap up free agent Mikey Owen for your next old boy manager - maybe hes not racist enough though, but Im sure he will pick it up quickly, hes only 32


Actually, Paulo De Canio, that loveable old fascist rogue may be available soon, given his recent issues at Swindon - get in there quick before Chelsee snap him up - its rare that such a good fit comes along


etc

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 100% agree and eloquently put. Trump's lawsuit will go nowhere. He can't sue in the UK as he is out of time and the bbc would have a case to countersue given all the times he has lied about the BBC. A court in Florida will have no jurisdiction in the UK and he would still have to prove malice and reputational damage. Well he won the elction so there's no argument on damage there. The program was not broadcast in the US, so very few if any people saw it. His entire speech is readily available to view elsewhere anyway. And on reputation, does he really want all the facts dragged out as you have listed them above? In what world does Trump thinks that leaves him with a good reputation that someone else could damage? It will go nowhere, like so many of his other lawsuits and court actions. The BBC should hold firm. A more curious question though is why the Telegraph waited until now to do their predictable mischief?   Agreed. To downplay the state murder of a journalist, in an embassy on foreign soil of all places, because he was 'not liked' by a lot of people, is just ludicrous and offensive. Compare that to his narrative around the murder of Charlie Kirk, who was also not liked by a lot of people. Trump is playing his guest as always, but it shows just how morally spineless he really is. 
    • He's done 34 foreign trips to 26 countries since becoming PM.  With all the in-fighting going on at #10 and with some MPs and one Labour mayor on manoeuvres,  should he not be staying at home and fighting for his premiership and the interests of the party?  or does he reckon he is already doomed and feels better away from it all?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...