Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > RIP Neil Young, City legend who scored the

> winning

> > goal in Citys last FA cup win.

>

> He really hated United too.


Well he was FROM Manchester

Funnily enough I agree about Collymore - for a bloke who I'd always marked down as a tool, he's made me think again. I also like Dury and.....unfashionably, Lawrenson. Green's a cliche, Motson was well well past his sell buy date and MOTD crew are generally far too chummy and close to the players IMO, although Dixon shows some promise.

Chiles great on MOTD 2 but not so good on ITV so far but his panel don't help him.


Beglin - too critical of players and dull

Green - too critical of players, referees, managers, traffic, weather etc etc was much better years ago

Collymore - shouts too much and if you followed his opinions over the course of a season he always contradicts himself


Enjoy listening to Pearce (now he has toned down) John Murray and John Campion is OK - and Nevin and Marcotti.


Still enjoy listening to Jimmy Armfield - he's comfy, warm, reassuring, like listening to the football with your grandad sat by the fire. Like Peter Jones and Bryan Butler he'lll be missed when he's gone.


Neville has done TV before and was pretty good although surprise, suprise he didn't always know when to shut up.

Murphy, spot on! esp Arnfield.


Just to add about Colin Murray. I did my utmost to dislike him, professional kopite etc... but unfortunately I think he's really good, asks questions from the fans' perspective. The Friday night prog on 5 live with Nevin and Groves is fantastic, a breadth of fresh air.


On tele though he seems intent on being slightly irreverent, probably to make his mark, definitely better on radio, for now.

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>Nevin and Groves is

> fantastic, a breadth of fresh air.

>

> On tele though he seems intent on being slightly

> irreverent, probably to make his mark, definitely

> better on radio, for now.



Nevin or Groves?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...