Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted
Pretty sure VP knew it was offside by way he swiped ball. Not sure it made much difference as he'd been starved of possession. If Barcelona had not been so profligate in front of goal could have been another 4 goals. The 700+ passes versus 199 for Arsenal says it was one sided and it was.
Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gutted for the Arsenal fans.

>

> Liverpool are still the only English team to beat

> Barca in the Camp Nou. Seems like a lifetime ago!

> Oh well, Porto/Braga tomorrow.


And here is how to put them out of Europe. :)


 

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Gutted for the Arsenal fans.

>

> Liverpool are still the only English team to beat

> Barca in the Camp Nou. Seems like a lifetime ago!

> Oh well, Porto/Braga tomorrow.


..and also probably only English side to remain unbeaten (in 4 visits)

Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted
Better side won. RVP sending off farcical. One second between whistle being blown and RVP shooting. Not sure the tatic of sitting off and inviting the opposition on to you was the right way to go. Abidal had his hands round RVPs throat and didn't get so much as a yellow card, so the post the nonsense about the CMPL being more severly punished by refs than in the prem has proven not to be the case. Alves also managed a nasty little scissor tackle on Cesc proving that they can mix the beautiful with the beast. They will be the team to beat in this competition.
mockney piers

mockney piers

Posted
Posted

Agree reffing was inconsistent and favoured the home side, sending off was ridiculous and effectively decided the tie as did a dubious penalty. But Arsenal got it wrong on the night and didn't do enough to merit going through.


I understand if Arsenal fans feel aggrieved with the way things went, but as EC says, better team went through.

Emerson Crane

Emerson Crane

Posted
Posted

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He seems to pop up and score important goals

> recently though. I've actually grown to have a lot

> more respect for him recently. After the pink

> boots/I'm the greatest guff last season I thought

> he'd settled down a bit. Still not an Arsenal

> favourite then?


Lets just say he's not flavour of the month.

murphy

murphy

Posted
Posted

RVP sending off was ridiculous, even if he knew he was offside he wasn't wasting time, the Fabregas back heel was criminal though. Only seen 5 min highlights but reports suggest Aresnal tried to play them at their own game. For Arsenal or any side surely you need to try something different to beat them like Mourinho did last year? Stat of the day is that since OPTTA started doing the Champions Leagues stats over 10 years ago Arsenal are the first side ever to have no shots in a match.


Great win for Palace last night with an incredible back heel into the bottom corner - would Messi be proud of it, no - the player misckicked, spun round to look for the ball and inadvertently it hit his heel and trickled into the corner.:)) - it's great when luck is with you for once. Bellamy was awful by the way.


Good luck to Spurs tonight, always seems to be a great atmosphere at WHL for evening matches.

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Good luck to Spurs tonight, always seems to be a

> great atmosphere at WHL for evening matches.



Thanks Murphy. There IS an amazing atmosphere at WHL evening matches especially in European games. Unfortunately I couldn't get a ticket for tonight so probably watching in the pub with a few mates.


Very happy for you Palace fans. A great result. All my family on my parents side were/are Palace supporters. I bucked the trend but have a little soft spot for them for obvious reasons.

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted
The problem with RVP is he'd almost certainly have shifted ball onto his left foot with the space he was in and drilled a more convincing shot at goal if he had any suspicion that he'd not been pulled up for offside. As it was he smashed the ball away in frustration. Not worthy of a yellow card but RVP should have not tested the Ref again after his earlier skirmish following the Wilshire injury.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • HeadNun
      Aroma Lab

      By HeadNun · Posted

      We had a take-away from Aroma Lab last night. I was impressed, utterly delicious stir fried tofu and sweet and sour chicken. Generous portions too… will definitely make a habit of eating their home-cooked food. 
    • Moovart
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Moovart · Posted

      I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Blah Blah
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Jules-and-Boo
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Jules-and-Boo · Posted

      Yes, but the context is important and the reason.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...