Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looks like Sullivan will playing bad cop and Gold good cop (good being comparative in this case) with Zola stuck right in the middle. It also looks like a case of getting your excuses in first and blaming everyone else for whatever happens for the rest of the season. Go down and it will be down to the greedy players, previous regime, etc; stay up and it will be down to Sullivan/Gold saving the club from the brink of extinction....
Will have to give this predicer thing a go later. Ideal results tonight - besides for our 3 points - would be wins for Arsenal, ManU, Chelsea and Wolves (given the respective managers in the night's other game, frankly I don't give a damn). Football creates strange temporary alliances.

Rhinestone Cowboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good to see I am not alone on West Ham 10-12th

> All good

>

> Wonder what will happen to Man City and Mancini if

> they don't get Champs league



Makes no difference, Mancini is only with us til summer then Maurinho will be taking charge. Mancinis "6mnths and three years" statement wasn't a slip of the tongue !

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Such a shame. Something seriously needs to be done

> about the debt in the Premier League or Pompey

> will be the first of many.

>

> Really feel for you Ratty.



Yes indeed, what Anna said. Would be a shame if the same fate befell ManUre. Can you imagine the out pouring of grief on this thread.

It is a bit odd that there is much head-shaking about clubs going into admin (or close) to at exactly the same time that Wenger is under pressure to spend (probably) more money than he has available


A weaker man than Wenger could easily take us down the road of a Leeds

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I didn't say wedge it "slightly" open. I meant to wedge it fully open. 
    • I have a rescue Spanish greyhound (galgo) from the charity mentioned above. You can contact Greyhounds in Need or one of the more local Kent greyhound rescue charities. They are fantastic family dogs. They do love walkies 2 or 3 times a day but they actually don't need to be walked too far and then they will happily loaf around on the sofa being very chill. They are brilliant with kids but not recommended if you own a cat as they have a strong prey drive. They also should be kept on the lead in local parks. They prefer to be around other sight-hounds (well my one does) and there are loads of local sighthound owners in Peckham, Crystal Palace etc and a very lively WhatsApp group that is brilliant if you need dog sitting as you can usually find someone to do that for free in return for you looking after the dog at a later date etc.
    • @Jenijenjen I assure you we are always polite and friendly too! Which is why the behaviour we have been receiving is so frustrating. The kids always leave her with a “Thank you have a lovely day”  Our concern is leaving the gate slightly wedged doesn’t stop the action of slamming it open and closed…still leading to damage  
    • If you're talking about who I think you are, I find them more exuberant than rude and usually smiling and polite. But then, I'm usually smiling and polite to them. Can you not wedge open your gate when you're expecting them?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...