Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Realised it's just over ten years since I first joined the forum, originally under a different name. Many of the most frequent posters back then have moved away or moved on, and it made me wonder who's still here.


Louisa, Dulwich Fox, ruffers, Sue, Loz. Who else?

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry Dulwich Fox - I always think of you as one

> of the long-serving forumites but looks like I was

> jumping the gun there.


I joined 11/07/2010.


I mistakenly thought that EDF was a bit like Twitter. and just typed 'Just Testing' to see if it was working.


The thread was bombarded with abuse. and cries of Troll. ???


After nearly 8 years, Nothing has changed. :)


Foxy

Snap, kristymac1 - we joined at virtually the same time! I'd been lurking on it a while before we made the decision to move to ED though. I'm such a fan of the forum - it's helped me out so many times (not to mention making sure I'm always up on local gossip).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...