Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Tractorlad Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have no issue is people having some well earned

> fun but cant help worrying the surrounding roads

> will be gridlocked. From the event website.

>

> "Peckham Rye and Nunhead Stations are CLOSED on 28

> May, please take this into consideration when

> travelling to the festival....There is no parking

> permitted within the festival site. We take no

> responsibility for your vehicle on the surrounding

> roads"



There are trains advertised from PR on 28 May and I am planning to use. Is this correctly advertised?

There is no service between Surrey Quays and Clapham Junction the whole bank holiday weekend (Sat-Mon). Replacement buses are running.


Additionally, I'm a local resident who utilizes the park to walk my two large dogs on a fairly regular basis and enjoy the space. While the festival is not my thing and I won't go, there is absolutely NO reason not to allow this. It's a public event for the public on public land.


For those who are wholly opposed - you have options - get out of town for the weekend, use another park, buy ear plugs (see where I'm going with this?).


At the end of the day this is a good lesson in tolerance, which many people need to learn more of.

dresswaves Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jimbo1964 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > dresswaves Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Does anyone know why they are using the Park

> &

> > not

> > > the Rye?

> >

> > That would make more sense. Guessing the extra

> > fencing?

>

> That?s what I thought but having seen the site

> today they have put solid fencing round the whole

> site even where there?s park fencing.



Southwark website says the promoters had other choices but they especially liked the "pretty" backdrop of this venue and wanted the visual impact of the trees and park for their ticket buyers. The common has no trees. They also said that on the common sound would be harder to contain, the trees act as a sound buffer.

JennaAZ Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is no service between Surrey Quays and

> Clapham Junction the whole bank holiday weekend

> (Sat-Mon). Replacement buses are running.

>

> Additionally, I'm a local resident who utilizes

> the park to walk my two large dogs on a fairly

> regular basis and enjoy the space. While the

> festival is not my thing and I won't go, there is

> absolutely NO reason not to allow this. It's a

> public event for the public on public land.

>

> For those who are wholly opposed - you have

> options - get out of town for the weekend, use

> another park, buy ear plugs (see where I'm going

> with this?).

>

> At the end of the day this is a good lesson in

> tolerance, which many people need to learn more

> of.


Maybe we can have Jeremy Corbyn next year as his event at White Hart Lane Rec isn't selling to well :)


https://action.labour.org.uk/page/content/labour-live-faqs/

jim_the_chin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can?t we all just slag off the tories? They?re to

> blame for destroying council budgets and forcing

> these sorts of measures - and once again they?ve

> got us all arguing amongst ourselves?


The government gives money to the local council but the local council are free to spend the money on whatever you voted for...many Labour councils will withhold money from the front line services and spend more on admin at the Town Hall....YOU have given them carte blanche to do this and do it they will- with impunity if central Government is Tory...so suck it up for another 4 years.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The government gives money to the local council

> but the local council are free to spend the money

> on whatever you voted for...many Labour councils

> will withhold money from the front line services

> and spend more on admin at the Town Hall....YOU

> have given them carte blanche to do this and do it

> they will- with impunity if central Government is

> Tory...so suck it up for another 4 years.


"If you tell a lie big enough and keep on repeating it, people will eventually believe it" - Joseph Goebbels


Don't know why that just came to mind...

I know right. I went to Dulwich park this weekend, and did you know, there's a caf?!!!???, right in the middle of the park!!!??? in the exact spot I wanted to sit and listen to my wireless. And all these people(probably out of towners) were in there eating, drinking and enjoying themselves. I don't know why the council didn't think of the local residents who can only use that 100sqm of park space, and couldn't possibly just sit somewhere else.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have had multiple jobs completed at my home by T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, and I wouldn't go to anyone else now. They always come at the agreed day/time, I have never been asked to rearrange. The jobs have always been completed to extremely high standards, and as a perfectionist myself, I appreciate this level of care and detail. I'm grateful of the clear up afterward too, leaving me very little to do after the job is done. I am always blown away by the speed and efficiency  - no waffle, no flannel, just sheer hard work from start to finish. In summary - a highly professional first class service. Don't hesitate to call T.D. PLUMBFIX SOLUTIONS LTD, if you like excellence and trade people that will respect your home. 
    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...