Jump to content

Recommended Posts

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > about time- he has only EVER told the TRUTH

>

> Convicted Fraudster Yaxley-Lennon is as honest as

> the day is long.


Have you noticed how the nights are drawing in?

  • 10 months later...

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is it that the news media always call him

> Tommy Robinson, but then without fail state that

> his real name is SYL within a couple of lines?

>

> There are plenty of other people in public life

> who operate under an assumed name that they don?t

> do this for:


Perhaps because those others aren?t in court, where people are identified by their real names?

To be fair, they are pretty much all variations on their given names, most commonly using their middle name instead of the first name. As for George Osborne, if my parents had called me Gideon, I'm not sure it would have taken me as long as that to change it by deed-poll.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite a few UK politicians have not used their given names

> https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/british-politicians-real-names_uk_571f722ae4b06bf544e0be73


They're all using their given surname, and either their middle name or a nickname as the first name.


"Tommy" uses a completely made up name, so quoting his real name alongside it seems fair.


Are you sympathetic to his cause, uncleglen?

9 and a half weeks is all he'll serve


9 Months given. 4 and a half to serve (I thought that would be if he showed good behavior but seems it's how it is), 2 months +already served.


He's been let off easy even though he claims he'll be murdered in jail (he won't be)

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Quite a few UK politicians have not used their

> given names

> >

> https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/british-pol

> iticians-real-names_uk_571f722ae4b06bf544e0be73

>

> They're all using their given surname, and either

> their middle name or a nickname as the first

> name.

>

> "Tommy" uses a completely made up name, so quoting

> his real name alongside it seems fair.

>

> Are you sympathetic to his cause, uncleglen?


According to Wiki (ermmm) "The name Tommy Robinson is a pseudonym taken from a prominent member of the "Men In Gear" (MIG) football hooligan crew, which follows Luton Town Football Club.[38] The member named Tommy Robinson wrote two books about his 25 years of hooliganism"

"his cause"....all he has done is highlight the activities of certain muslims ...if you wish to learn more watch Three Girls the docudrama about Rochdale groomers...on Netflix- and it was made by the BBC...a 3 part mini series. And the perps are STILL in the UK as they have a Human Right to a family life according to the EC

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fishbiscuits Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > uncleglen Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Quite a few UK politicians have not used

> their

> > given names

> > >

> >

> https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/british-pol

>

> > iticians-real-names_uk_571f722ae4b06bf544e0be73

> >

> > They're all using their given surname, and

> either

> > their middle name or a nickname as the first

> > name.

> >

> > "Tommy" uses a completely made up name, so

> quoting

> > his real name alongside it seems fair.

> >

> > Are you sympathetic to his cause, uncleglen?

>

> According to Wiki (ermmm) "The name Tommy Robinson

> is a pseudonym taken from a prominent member of

> the "Men In Gear" (MIG) football hooligan crew,

> which follows Luton Town Football Club.[38] The

> member named Tommy Robinson wrote two books about

> his 25 years of hooliganism"

> "his cause"....all he has done is highlight the

> activities of certain muslims ...if you wish to

> learn more watch Three Girls the docudrama about

> Rochdale groomers...on Netflix- and it was made by

> the BBC...a 3 part mini series. And the perps are

> STILL in the UK as they have a Human Right to a

> family life according to the EC



Hideous comments - not even a prerence this time. Maybe emboldened by a Boris/Trump world.

Tommy Robinson, or rather Stephen Yaxley-Lennon hasn't merely highlighted the activities of certain muslims. He has led a crusade to bait gullible hooligans to hate ALL muslims. He does not care about the victims of CSA. He has used them to fuel his real agenda which is a crusade against an entire religion. And yes, why is the vile apologism of Uncleglen still here?
And just to add that anyone in central London today, around Westminster would have seen what despicable thugs follow the likes of Tommy Robinson. Up to 200 hooligans attacked the remain protesters outside Parliament and the press at College Green. These are not people who believe in freedom of speech or difference of opinion. They are boot boys who beat the crap out of anyone with a different view. So Uncleglen, you can go do one with your defence of a rabble rousing thug who today, got just what he has been asking for.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...