Stephen Yaxley-Lennon

[Quia Differt]

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A thread concerning Britain's most notorious

> neo-fascist, QD posts approvingly about his videos

> as if they're true, complaining he never sees

> anything about it in the Guardian. QD gets pulled

> up on this and various other unpleasantness, such

> as calling Jews a a race. QD whines the thread has

> been hijacked. Excellent. Skin crawling casual

> racist misogynist.

Calling Jews a Race was simply a mistake. You have no credibility in my eyes as your mind is totally fixed and nothing will change your view. It's just frightening that you actually influence our next generation.

ONCE AGAIN back to the original subject and prod and smear and abuse as much as you want but I shall not respond to either you or RPC again so the stage is yours little Man.

[rendelharris]

Quia Differt Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A thread concerning Britain's most notorious

> > neo-fascist, QD posts approvingly about his

> videos

> > as if they're true, complaining he never sees

> > anything about it in the Guardian. QD gets

> pulled

> > up on this and various other unpleasantness,

> such

> > as calling Jews a a race. QD whines the thread

> has

> > been hijacked. Excellent. Skin crawling casual

> > racist misogynist.

>

> Calling Jews a Race was simply a mistake. You have

> no credibility in my eyes as your mind is totally

> fixed and nothing will change your view. It's just

> frightening that you actually influence our next

> generation.

>

> ONCE AGAIN back to the original subject and prod

> and smear and abuse as much as you want but I

> shall not respond to either you or RPC again so

> the stage is yours little Man.

Very much back to the original subject, you spoke approvingly of the propaganda videos of Britain's most notorious neo-fascist, whom this thread concerns, complaining that the Guardian (amusingly misspelled, very witty, that did make me laugh - the first time I saw someone doing it in about 1975) didn't cover this apparent "truth". Was that "simply a mistake" as well?

Please feel free not to respond to me, the less you do the better. In fact, as you have previously been banned from this forum for being a skin crawling casual racist misogynist, and you don't live anywhere near East Dulwich, do you have any reason to be here at all except to troll and spout your poorly disguised racist claptrap?

[edcam]

Yep. Definitely creepy. I see what Admin meant in the Louisa thread.

[Robert Poste's Child]

The now-deleted 'gender stereotypes' thread wasn't pleasant.

[edcam]

Quite happy not to have seen that one!

[Quia Differt]

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

RH....

> Very much back to the original subject, you spoke

> APPROVINGLY of the propaganda videos of Britain's

> most notorious neo-fascist, whom this thread

> concerns, complaining that the Guardian didn't cover this apparent "truth". Was

> that "simply a mistake" as well?

I made an error calling The Jews a Race and as soon as it was pointed out I accepted the mistake immediately.

Ever made a mistake ? ( apart from going into Teaching that is ? )

Now as we HAVE finally returned to the Subject I shall answer your point and ignore the usual frothing fascist nonsense because that is exactly what you are mein freund. Have a Whisky or something to calm you. I suggest "Teachers! "..I bet you haven't heard that one either, mon ami.

You will note the capitalisation below. Firstly this is what I ACTUALLY SAID :

" He knew the rules so on that basis it appears a fair cop.

INTERESTING to hear his address at The Oxford Union which is on You Tube particularly his videos of what is actually happening in his Hometown of Luton and also it shows the treatment Stacey Dooley, The BBC Reporter received when accompanying a Muslim March there which is also her Hometown."

Now I pray you don't teach our language as where does it say I APPROVE of what he said ? NOWHERE ! You simply LIED through your teeth Son.

Since when did saying something was "interesting" mean it's "approval?? ". YOU SIMPLY LIED.

In fact at no point did I say I approved of what he said . You simply INVENTED me saying that.

See rendell you make mistakes too though it wasn't a mistake just a blatant lie.

I DO approve of him showing videos of The BBC Reporter Stacey Dooley being verbally abused .

So perhaps YOU could answer a question or two now matey :

Have you actually seen these videos and, if so, what do you feel about the following ?

1/ How do you feel about the videos clearly showing the stoning of Black and White Families to force them out of the area?

2/ How do you feel about this Woman ( Stacey Dooley ) being clearly abused for her dress sense on the march?

3/ How do you feel about these Guys saying they ONLY obeyed Sharia Law and would disregard our Laws?

4/ Were these videos ever commented on in The Guardian then ?

The stage is yours mi amigo. I shall exeunt stage left as I will interested to hear how you intrepreted my comments about what he SAID as "approval" as well as your answers to the above or are you going to avoid the questions like you would like to avoid any meaningful Debate about it ?

[Quia Differt]

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite happy not to have seen that one!

Hi Eduardo . I wondered when the final part of this UNholy Trinity was going to emerge.

I think you owe me an apology don't you Old Chap?

You said I got " caught out" implying that I tried to return here undetected from my first appearance. That was because Admin simply said "Untruth" when I said I put exactly the same E-Mail address. It transpired the ONLY difference was that I stated my my name , exactly like before, but with ".com" after my name instead of the suffix ".co.uk " so as you can plainly see no deception was attempted so I was not " caught out" at all.

What say you now ?

[Robert Poste's Child]

'the usual frothing fascist nonsense'? That's pretty rich.

'Exeunt'. Thought so.

[Quia Differt]

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'the usual frothing fascist nonsense'? That's

> pretty rich.

Depends on your interpretation of fascist RPC.

It's characterized by forcible suppression of opposition. The "forcible" being in words not physical .

>

> 'Exeunt'. Thought so...as in Love Labours Lost: Exeunt.

As our Teaching friend finally returned to the subject I replied and shall eagerly await his ripostes

[edcam]

The same as I said before since you ask.

Quia Differt Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> What say you now ?

[rendelharris]

Exeunt is a plural and only used when more than one character leaves. Nothing funnier than seeing someone trying to be clever and failing miserably through ignorance - or are you referring to your split personality as a nice person (according to you) and a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist (according to those who've seen your previous incarnation)?

You described Robinson's propaganda as "his videos of what is actually happening in his Hometown of Luton." Clear affirmation of the fact that you believe them. No "allegedly" or any other qualifier, you've watched a video made by a proven neo-fascist and taken it as a true account of "what is actually happening". Your words.

Re the videos, the BBC video Robinson showed referred to people being subject to racial attacks. No mention of Islam or religion at all.

Re Stacey Dooley being abused, she was abused by a small number - a very small number - of stupid fanatics. Wrong? Definitely. Representative? No. Same for finding a few idiots who say they only obey Sharia law.

If you want to stir up hatred, it's very easy to find a few hotheads with ignorant bigotted opinions (I trust you recognise yourself) and make a video framed to make it look as though they represent the majority. The fact that you find such videos interesting and refer to their content as if it's clearly true speaks volumes.

There's a reason it hasn't been discussed in the Guardian or indeed other media outlets - it's because, unlike you, most people don't fall hook line and sinker for whatever biased manipulated rubbish is served up as truth in order to fuel hatred and confirm prejudice.

[Robert Poste's Child]

QD, the thing to remember when watching video is that it's edited. The process starts with a point of view or a message and the available footage is cut to support that. Even genuine reporting, whether it's for TV, print or radio, reflects the agenda or ideology of the organisation that produces it. It's rarely politically neutral.

[Quia Differt]

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The same as I said before since you ask.

>

> Quia Differt Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > What say you now ?

So, for example you think originally putting "TonySebastianFarquharson.co.uk", for example, and the second time round

"TonySebastianFarquharson.. com" constitutes trying some form of deception and getting " caught out?".does it ?

:)

[rendelharris]

Quia Differt Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The same as I said before since you ask.

> >

> > Quia Differt Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > >

> > > What say you now ?

>

> So, for example you think originally putting

> "TonySebastianFarquharson.co.uk", for example, and

> the second time round

> "TonySebastianFarquharson.. com" constitutes

> trying some form of deception and getting " caught

> out?".does it ?

>

> :)

You're in danger of distracting from the main point of why people were laughing at you, which is that you have had to develop a new alias as previously you were banned from the forum for being a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist. I'm sure you'd like people to remember that.

[Quia Differt]

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> QD, the thing to remember when watching video is

> that it's edited. The process starts with a point

> of view or a message and the available footage is

> cut to support that. Even genuine reporting,

> whether it's for TV, print or radio, reflects the

> agenda or ideology of the organisation that

> produces it. It's rarely politically neutral.

You make a salient point RPC. You are right in saying that.

[Quia Differt]

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Exeunt is a plural and only used when more than

> one character leaves. Nothing funnier than seeing

> someone trying to be clever and failing miserably

> through ignorance -

Ah!1 You seem to have sobered up ! Excellent !

So you are a Grammar Nazi, as well as a mere run-of-the-mill Nazi who wants to stifle a debate ? You got the Double up. Well Done You. lol

or are you referring to your split personality as a nice person (according to

> you)

ONCE AGAIN where did I say that ? It's Another Lie isn't it rendell? ...If not kindly show me where I said that then, please?

"and a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist

> (according to those who've seen your previous

> incarnation)?...

What goes around Rendell, My Dear, comes around..

." according to THOSE" PLURAL.. The only reference to that was from Admin . SINGULAR NOT PLURAL...THOSE is only used when MORE THAN ONE CHARACTER IS SAYING IT.

Nothing funnier than seeing someone " hoist by their own petard" as Shakespeare would say which is funnier seeing that you picked me up on a stage direction often used in The Bard's Plays!

I thought you knew the difference between Singular and Plural ? Seems Not !!! :)

SHEER BLISS...How do you feel now ? :)

TALKING of "Approval" you BLATANTLY lied when you said I "APPROVED" of what he said adding the "neo-nazi attachment" for further effect. Nothing funnier than seeing someone be so weak that they can not admit to a blatant "untruth" when caught out so I ask you again ..Why did you say I approved of what he SAID where I have CLEARLY demonstrated I didn't ?

So was it a mistake or yet another lie from you then Rendell ?

I didn't bother with the rest of your "drivel"

Continually blatantly lying does you no favours at all mijn vriend..

[rendelharris]

Quia Differt Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> "and a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist

> > (according to those who've seen your previous

> > incarnation)?...

>

> What goes around Rendell, My Dear, comes

> around..

>

> ." according to THOSE" PLURAL.. The only reference

> to that was from Admin . SINGULAR NOT

> PLURAL...THOSE is only used when MORE THAN ONE

> CHARACTER IS SAYING IT.

"Those" referring to both Admin and those others who have seen your previous incarnation, including me, as your slithering unpleasant statements are still easily discoverable on this forum. Nice try, failed. You're neither witty enough nor clever enough to try that sort of thing, I'm afraid.

[Quia Differt]

rendelharris:

>

> You're in danger of distracting from the main

> point of why people were laughing at you, which is

> that you have had to develop a new alias as

> previously you were banned from the forum for

> being a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist.

> I'm sure you'd like people to remember that.

Again you fail to differentiate between Singular and Plural. There was just ONE comment to that effect.

An opinion by someone referring to my comments many years ago. Just one person's opinion. Well this one person's opinion was that that comment was nonsense.

The fact that YOU and your sidekick have chosen to repeat that phrase over and over does not make it correct. It takes " sucking up" to a new low but it IS amusing so keep it up ! :)

OBVIOUSLY if I was banned I HAD to use another name but Admin are the important ones here not you and I made no attempt to change my name to them so stop talking nonsense.

[Quia Differt]

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quia Differt Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > rendelharris Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

>

> > "and a skin crawling casual-racist misogynist

> > > (according to those who've seen your previous

> > > incarnation)?...

> >

> > What goes around Rendell, My Dear, comes

> > around..

> >

> > ." according to THOSE" PLURAL.. The only

> reference

> > to that was from Admin . SINGULAR NOT

> > PLURAL...THOSE is only used when MORE THAN ONE

> > CHARACTER IS SAYING IT.

>

> "Those" referring to both Admin and those others

> who have seen your previous incarnation, including

> me, as your slithering unpleasant statements are

> still easily discoverable on this forum. Nice

> try, failed. You're neither witty enough nor

> clever enough to try that sort of thing, I'm

> afraid.

You said "ACCORDING TO THOSE".....that CLEARLY suggests OTHERS have mentioned that was their opinion of me from before which no-one else has on here so AGAIN you are wrong.

Pathetically you have STILL not let us all know why you LIED about saying I "approved" of The Subjects views so why did you lie as you MUST know it was a lie because I only wrote 3/4 lines so it's easy to reference.

Again why the blatant lie rendelharris ?

[rendelharris]

Bored with your drivel now, there's a limit to how interesting it is watching someone make a fool of himself before it all just becomes rather pathetic. You've amply demonstrated what sort of person you are, I shall not be responding to any more of your leaden "wit" nor your spoon-sharp intellectual points. Farewell, skin crawling casual-racist misogynist.

[Robert Poste's Child]

QD, something I've wondered about since your first posts in your new name is that there's a sense that English may not be your first language. I'm asking from genuine interest as I realise it might make a difference to how people interpret your comments.

[Quia Differt]

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bored with your drivel now, there's a limit to how

> interesting it is watching someone make a fool of

> himself before it all just becomes rather

> pathetic. You've amply demonstrated what sort of

> person you are, I shall not be responding to any

> more of your leaden "wit" nor your spoon-sharp

> intellectual points. Farewell, skin crawling

> casual-racist misogynist.

I asked you at 2.44 not to acknowledge me so blame yourself and your myriad of replies since then.

Farewell O , what's the word rendel for someone who is incredibly rude and offensive, acts as a Grammar and Verbal Nazi, tries a smearing campaign and fails, then in desperation blatantly lies and then,pitifully, refuses 3 times to answer why he lied and now wants to disappear over the horizon with his tail between his legs ?

I do APOLOGISE though for not resorting to smearing or lying or name-calling or being rude or being ofensive ( well not too much ) but just remember to instil into your pupils your Mantra that :

1/ No-one should be given a second chance

2/ That they should automatically believe someone's opinion about someone from comments made years ago that they have not seen themselves without seeing any evidence

3/ That at all times they should attempt to stifle debate if someone has a different opinion

4/ Re-assure them if all else fails try to smear them and get them to enlist others to do the same

5/ Failing that just get them to lie through their teeth

6/ When called out on that get them to continually ignore the accusation

7/ Then if and when, sadly, the battle is lost get them to retreat over the horizon not to re-appear until the dust settles and most importantly of all and you MUST empthasise this rendel that whatever the situation they ignore all facts to the contrary of their beliefs and maintain a fixed and rigid view that they must not change UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES and then they can follow in your illustrious footsteps.

Farewell... :)

[Quia Differt]

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> QD, something I've wondered about since your first

> posts in your new name is that there's a sense

> that English may not be your first language. I'm

> asking from genuine interest as I realise it might

> make a difference to how people interpret your

> comments.

Beautiful. I like that RPC. :)

You have got me thinking RPC. Who knows on a different forum on a different subject at a different time who knows where our banter could have taken us and what it might have lead to ?

Anyway your pesky brother rendel has finally gone so what you doing on the forum later ?

Could you teach me to write and talk proper has I do strugle wiv me engleesch sumtimes ?

[Robert Poste's Child]

Sorry, washing my hair.

[Quia Differt]

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, washing my hair.

Thank You for letting me down gently RPC.

btw: Would you mind awfully if I plagirised that " sense of that English may not be your first language. ? "

I can imagine you writing that with a sweet smile which is a happy note to end on...:)