Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The problem with bullying is that the victim is unlikely to say anything. Moreover, relatively few are willing to intervene on behalf of the person being bullied - even where completely against the practice. As has been mentioned above, (publicly at least) it can be highly subtle, to the extent that it is virtually undetectable. Lord knows what might be occurring via PM though.

If there are bullying PMs then they must be reported to admin immediately, it's completely against T&Cs of usage and will result in the deactivation of their account if they are deemed to have broken them. If they create alter egos then the computer can be banned too, not just the account.


I'm, not sure bullying by definition can be subtle can it? That just sounds like persistent disagreements to me, but like i say, if someone feels bullied then for god's sake report it, we're not schoolkids with some playground 'we don't grass' code of honour here.


If a grown up is bullying then they don't deserve access to this service.

Well I don't see how anybody can do anything if it's 'bullying via PM' and the victim doesn't say anything. We're not mind readers.


If bullying is so subtle it's undetectable then it's so subtle it's not bullying surely?


Sue's definition seems pretty reasonable - and I haven't seen any persistent attempts to hurt or humiliate anyone on this forum. Disagreeing with someone is not the same as setting out to hurt or humiliate someone. Being brash or assertive isn't bullying either - a bully needs a victim.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm, not sure bullying by definition can be subtle

> can it?


Well, I think - e.g. intimidation - can be extremely subtle.


> If a grown up is bullying then they don't deserve

> access to this service.


Absolutely.

I don't think intimidation can be classed as bullying - unless it's threats with menaces.


There's plenty of people I feel intimidated by, but that doesn't make them bullies.


You can't kick someone off the forum because someone else feels small around them ;-)

I have to confess I once called someone a gobshite on the forum. They took it badly and asked me (by PM) to phone them so I could say it personally. Perhaps they misunderstood MY meaning of the word. It wasn't meant to be as bad as it sounds and was written in the heat of debate.......sort of. The written word can lead to all sorts of misunderstandings particularly if you only know someone through their forum persona.

Well I suppose it depends on your definition of bullying. According to Wikipedia (I know!):


Bullying consists of three basic types of abuse ? emotional, verbal, and physical. It typically involves subtle methods of coercion such as intimidation. Bullying can be defined in many different ways. The UK currently has no legal definition of bullying,[5] while some U.S. states have laws against it.[6]


So although it doesn't look like there is a legal definition in UK law, I would agree with LM and say that intimidation is very much part of bullying, especially if it is persistent or targeted at one individual.


Anyway, to the OP - I think if you know who the boy is then avenues such as the parents, school or police are open to you, but I would try to gather the evidence from the website before he gets chance to delete it. Otherwise it will become harder (although likely not impossible) for you to locate.

I haven't seen any persistent attempts to hurt or humiliate anyone on this forum. Disagreeing with someone is not the same as setting out to hurt or humiliate someone. Being brash or assertive isn't bullying either - a bully needs a victim.


I'm with MP and H on this...and Lord knows H and I have had some massive barnies....but always out of some major disagreement in a debate, not because of anything personal (we've never met). And yes admin can deal with anyone who sets out to harass or intimidate.


The forum is not for the faint hearted at times, debate can be fierce and if there's any chinks in a viewpoint it often is ripped apart by some very dogged and intelligent debaters. I think some people mistake that for bullying because they can't win the debate, then others turn to insult because they can't tolerate a different view point too (that does wind me up I have to admit). And I tend to think that a lot of the clashes on the forum are personality clashes more than anything...or whatever the written word equivalent of that is....and that's just part of life...not everyone is going to like or get on or agree with everyone.

I would also agree that premeditated intimidation is a form of bullying but there are people I might be intimidated by because they are massively talented for example.....so it has to be an 'act' of intimidation to be considered as bullying. Making fun of someone on a thread might be considered bullying too, if we take Sue's definition, if the person at the receiving end feels upset by it. It entirely depends on the intent. I think that is the kind of bullying that a lot of children are subjected to.

Can I be the first to say.....ENOUGH.


For the love of god, give it a rest. Please. This is actually getting painful to read. And that's not through sympathy.


The amount of passive-aggressive behaviour on here is startling.

No I wasn't being ironic.


I'm just asking, nay pleading, with you (and others) to just stop. It's relentless and isn't even limited to this thread.


I get it. You have issues with other forumites. Don't we all. But the rest of us seem to manage without resorting to this sort of stuff.


Accusations of cliques, subtle intimidation, bullying etc. Have you been on many other forums? Have you seen them? This is like paradise. God, sometimes it's like being back at school in here with the childlike behaviour that takes place.


I say that I talk for no one but myself but I'm bloody tired of it.

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

If a person has an issue with someone

> and instead of dealing directly with that person,

> engages on a campaign of what is effectively

> slander to anyone who will listen, is that

> bullying?

>


xxxxxxxxxxx


No, it's just extremely immature behaviour.


If you have an issue with somebody you should go to see them and sort it out, not slag them off behind their backs to people who don't even know them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...