Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I believe it's being investigated as an alternative to extending the 63 to Honor Oak Park station, as there no standing room for a bus there, so instead they were talking about extending the 172 past Honor Oak Park and around to Forest Hill Road. I'm not sure how far it would be travelling on from there.

Considering I've seen four 63's parked up on Forest Hill Road recently, I don't think the 172 would have enough space there.


Peckham Rye has a spare stand at the moment, although that is currently used for short running buses on the 12, 37, 63, P12 and 197.

No, you were referring to Honor Oak Park station.


If it were a Tube station it would have a Tube line through it, which it doesn't.


If it were in Honor Oak, it would not be in Honor Oak Park, which it is.





Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry dear, I should have been more specific just

> for u: I was referring to Honor Oak Tube Station!

> >:D

>

>

> Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wot u on about mostly all the buses in ED touch

> a

> > tube station!

It's a tube to me too! :)-D

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bring on the pedantics.....! It's a 'tube' station

> to me and many others, probably the nearest Iam

> ever going to get to one at least whilst living

> where I do.....

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bring on the pedantics.....! It's a 'tube' station

> to me and many others, probably the nearest Iam

> ever going to get to one at least whilst living

> where I do.....


It's amazing the places that ARE on the tube network these days...


http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ4p36OhwW0-Bt9mpN35RsTZqiDs60ESmbfTVd2fpHkqT-ue5BH

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The DLR is also on that map. Just sayin'.




Quite! The Tube map only shows TfL-managed services.


But then as lots of the Underground is overground and quite a bit of the Overground is underground, maybe I should stop worrying and love the bomb/get out more...

Don't get your hopes up! I would have expected that the Peckham Rye Councillors (hoped?) would be consulted/contacted about any plans to extend the 172. I've heard nothing, we are still continuing with the extend the 63 campaign. The reason that so far we have had no success, is on the grounds of cost. (Boris, unfortunately, has not been supportive). I doubt if it was too costly to extend the 63 4 stops, it would be any cheaper to extend the 172 from the Brockley Rise end.

Renata

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So competitive....! >:D

> jctg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On Friday 1 July I saw a no.78 bus (with the

> > destination Shoreditch) on the M1 heading north

> > just south of Watford Gap services. This is

> true.



That's nothing...


http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRSuOsu-K69YGvtFS_FePBe4sqdNa4D5sVp4sGmGQtCpdZ-NeoqDA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBF, the council has tackled graffiti on Walworth, Old and New Kent Roads - you can see that many businesses there have been cleaned up en masse - but Rye Lane hasn’t. 
    • Hi, I am from the Southwark Day Centre and could collect some apples if I am. It too late... Bettina 
    • Labour's latest Rye Lane Ward newsletter is now saying that demolition in the square will start this summer and that the wider station upgrade is expected to be signed off this year - as explained above, sadly wrong on both counts. It describes the renovation of adjacent buildings on Blenheim Grove as "successful", despite having lain empty for a couple of years, longer than the actual renovation works, before saying "the Council is hopeful [it] will see its first new occupants move in to this year". Cue desperate attempt to get at least one in before end of financial year? As for the other topic, in "November 2023, faced with a huge increase in graffiti across the borough, Labour-run Southwark council took action". Nice turn of phrase eh? Rather, after community pressure regarding years of inaction by said Labour-run council, it's finally started to do a little bit, a little late. Surely there would be more chance of resolving issues if our council could for once be part of an honest, informed discussion?
    • I don’t think anyone has mentioned Peckham FoodCycle yet, they might enjoy some apples! https://foodcycle.org.uk/location/foodcycle-peckham-saturdays/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...