Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,


A friend of a friend has just lost her father, and I was wondering if anyone had any advice on books that they have found useful in the desperately sad situation of having lost a parent?


Thanks in advance for any tips. Sophie x

It's not about losing a parent, but I found it helpful when my dad died: A Grief Observed, C S Lewis's memoir about losing his wife. As he's such a good writer I remember he just hit the nail on the head very succinctly several times, including the observation that he'd never realised grief is so much like waiting.


That's assuming the friend is adult (or over about 15/16) -it's not a children's book.

So sorry to hear about your friend. TBH, I think everyone is different. Personally, I just put some "useful" books (cannot even remember their titles) straight into the bin. I remember desperately reading novels, things that were light and had some humour just to escape the sadness for a little while, whereas a friend of mine how also recently lost her dad became really interested in aspects of her dad's background - he was from Ireland and could trace his family quite far back, that kind of thing. I know this is not terribly helpful, but maybe chat to the friend to gauge how she approaches mourning?

Mx

The Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion - a beautifully heartfelt book that made profound sense to me when reading it a couple of months after a sudden unexpected bereavement of an immediate family member.


Might make sense to your friend too - especially if the sad death of her dad was unexpected.


Elizabeth Kubler Ross - On Death and Dying is a classic - but might be too "scholarly" and not quite what you are after...

I agree with mima08 on checking if a book would be required (obv ignore this if you've been asked to suggest a book).


When I lost my dad (very suddenly 11yrs ago) I wanted to talk to my family and friends (who'd known him) and share memories, tears and laughter. Don't think a book talking about death/showing ways to grieve would have helped.


Maybe if I was having problems/struggling with feelings a few months down the line I may have looked into a book, but not in the early days/weeks, infact, I think I'd have been upset by it and felt it suggested that I wasn't grieving "correctly" (had one friend tell me I sounded too happy when I told her I'd lost my dad when actually it was the first time I'd managed to say it in one go without crumpling).

I agree that the bereavement books would be of little help in the early months. I couldn't read anything longer than a poem or magazine for several months after our bereavement and then looked for fiction to escape into. Eventually I did find accounts of people who had suffered losses similar to ours very helpful - just to know you are not alone. A piece of well chosen poetry was always good though, succinct and beautiful and without empathy, which was strangely helpful. I would advise reading about grief before one is bereaved, so that we can properly support our friends and know a little about the process before we are plunged into it ourselves.


As an aside, the most helpful gifts I received in the desperate early weeks were food. You can never know how relieved you are to receive a shepherds pie, when your children need tea and you cant even think about food, let alone make any. The least helpful gifts are flowers - you get too many, you have to get out and borrow vases from your neighbours, your house starts to smell like a florist, and the water all starts to turn brown.


I wish your friend strength and peace.

Michael Rosen - two books which he wrote after the death of his son Eddie, he also brings in the loss of his (Michael's) mother.

1.Sad Book - although intended more for children I think it is quite moving and really captures feelings, attitudes and responses to death.

2. Carrying The Elephant - poetry around the theme of loosing someone (more adult orientated).


For me the good thing about both books is they capture and convey so much whilst being funny and moving and they are both easy to read and dip in to - without feeling you are wading through a manual about death. They are very much somebody's experiences rather than "These are the stages of grief.."

I use both books with the young people I work with and they have proven themselves over and over to be helpful to people of all ages.

LuLu Too Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Year of Magical Thinking by Joan Didion - a

> beautifully heartfelt book that made profound

> sense to me when reading it a couple of months

> after a sudden unexpected bereavement of an

> immediate family member.

>

> Might make sense to your friend too - especially

> if the sad death of her dad was unexpected.

>

> Conversely I read this book not long after losing a very close friend unexpectedly; it irritated the hell out of me to the point of throwing the bloody thing across the room! I found it name-dropping, c'leb obsessed, self-absorbed twaddle & couldn't focus at all on any 'truths' it may have offered. Clearly it wasn't helpful for me! I only mention this as the other side of the coin - your friend could take it either way I guess. Like everything on here you'll probably always find someone who loved a specific book & someone who hated it (sorry).


Incidentally I loved Michael Rosen's 'Sad' book. It's aimed at kids, but it really struck a chord with me. Also I bought 'Carrying the Elephant' for the mother of my Godson when he died horribly young in a car crash, it was some months after, but she said that it helped to dip into it sometimes. Again, it's difficult to judge on behalf of someone else though, & she might have been fibbing to make me feel better!

yes its awfully tricky isn't it?? When I was bereaved (for a very young child) I really would not have responded well at all to a book = this was my grief and no one was going to suggest that there was a given pattern to how this proceeded. However when the grief is part of the natural cycle of things (ie an older person who has lived a proper life) then I think I would have accepted such a book with more grace. One can feel very fragile and everything is incredibly personal/sensitive. You don't want 'your' person/loss to be lumped in with all the others that have gone before - am I making sense here? And of course, everyone reacts so very differently. Hmmm not much help but wanted to lob some personal experiences into the mix.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...