Jump to content

Plot to rename bonfire night


DulwichFox

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't mind if they renamed Trafalgar Square. I can pronounce square ok but for some reason the t word just doesn't roll off the tongue. I guess I'm the only one who has this problem and therefore no point in starting a petition. Do you think I may have a very obscure illness which science may pay loads to investigate?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely The Colour Thief is just a bloody name they've given to the thing. Like the fireworks and light and whatever the hell else they're throwing into the mix are attempting to tell some kind of story beyond, you know, not blowing up parliament. (Because we all know that while we may have forgotten the true meaning of winterval, we all of us stuff our faces with parkin and toffee apples and wave sparklers around while ruminating on the nature of democracy.)


Do any of you remember stories? The Christmas Ballet for instance. You know, the one with the wooden soldiers and the sugarplum fairy. Bloody politically correct wankers naming it after a kitchen utensil. I don't know. I blame the EU. Or the muslims. Or the marxists. Or Hermione. Or soft shandy-drinking Guardian readers.


I assume there's some interpretation, some story to be told, perhaps through the medium of arsey joykillers: first they're ruddy cheeked and indignant (colour). Then their faces blanch as their blood runs cold and they realise that they've been had, and are in fact, just a bunch of arsey joykillers and this is nothing to be so excited about (colour thievery). Up. In. Arms.


Mockers - you, me, a flask full of mulled cider, bobbing for apples in a riot of colour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To blow up the Tower of London ?Now gives food for thoughts?,

I seem to remember someone mentioned a Guy named Fawkes.

With his friend?s he brought in many large barrels of gun powder,

the bigger the barrels the explosion would be so much louder.


He was not there to steal the Crown or Royal family Jewels,

as they found that he had taken with him no digging tools.

Before he found the time that he could strike the match.

he was taken by Warders and found guilty of a plot to hatch.


Today we remember the fireworks that would have been,

if they had not discovered in the cellars and been seen.

So the Ravens can still feed free on the Tower Green,

the Beefeater watches as their feathers they do preen.


To celebrate this non event, Fires and Fireworks display,

November the fifth this anniversary of that ancient day.

Let off you chosen Squib, Rocket or Katherine Wheel,

bought much earlier you were likely to get a good deal.


Whether you go to the Blackheath , or nearby Peckham Rye,

or to Dulwich Park the rockets will rise high into the sky.

Beware whilst holding that firework or banger in your hand,

an explosion in a closed hand then you will no longer stand.


The invitation asked of me to be your Guy for the large fire.

before reaching the top of the pile I would surely expire.

If its alright by you, I will stay behind in the dusky glimmer,

there at least I can take a rest on my faithful Zimmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeh, but Mockers, Rosie, can't we all buy a ticket to one of the scrillion other fireworks displays and mull our jerkins there like everyone else?


If Southwark are going to spend big bucks on a commoonity thingy, it would be a great idea to do something different or at least something on when there isn't much else. The weekends around Bonfire Night are full of events. How about an end-of-winter pig roasting, ale swilling party to cheer us all up in February?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

How about an

> end-of-winter pig roasting, ale swilling party to

> cheer us all up in February?


A quick search reveals on 1st or 2nd of February the festivals (by which I mean pagan and Christian) of Candlemass and Imbolc* - otherwise known as St. Brigid's day - meant to celebrate the arrival of spring. Just what we need after a miserable January and should satisfy the religious, the crystal-botherers and the 'what-about-a-party-then?' types (i.e. the rest of us).


Like many Celtic festivals, the Imbolc celebrations centred around the lighting of fires. Fire was perhaps more important for this festival than others as it was also the holy day of Brigid (also known as Bride, Brigit, Brid), the Goddess of fire, healing and fertility. The lighting of fires celebrated the increasing power of the Sun over the coming months. For the Christian calendar, this holiday was reformed and renamed 'Candlemas' when candles are lit to remember the purification of the Virgin Mary.



http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/14/Imbolc_Festival_February_3rd_2007.jpg/220px-Imbolc_Festival_February_3rd_2007.jpg


Imbolc-fest, Marsden West Yorks. Feb 2007.


So... fires, mulled things and wassail - and time for the council to spend what's left before the new financial year.



*"(pronounced 'im'olk' also known as Oimelc) comes from an Irish word that was originally thought to mean 'in the belly' although many people translate it as 'ewe's milk' (oi-melc)."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Statement on Southwark Council's plans for Guy Fawkes Night 2011


Councillor Veronica Ward, Cabinet Member for Culture, Leisure and Sport at Southwark Council, said: "There is absolutely no truth in the claim that we want to rename Guy Fawkes Night.


"The facts of the matter are that we are currently consulting locally to see if people want a traditional fireworks display in the south of the borough. A decision on whether this goes ahead will be entirely up to them.


"Finally, the council will not be holding an event called 'The Colour Thief'. This was an earlier proposed theme - not agreed council policy - for a community event but has since been dropped."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Rolo Tomasi,

That statement is exactly the sort of this thing that gives politicans and PR people such bad names. It's full of lies and we've documentary proof it is.


79 local residents heard Verionica Ward last Thursday 15 September at Dulwich library during the Dulwioch Communminty Council hear her call it The Colour Thief.... and that although it would have some fireworks was not a firework night celebration or to be considered part of bonfire weekend despite being on 4 November.


The meeting was told by council officers the police were happy with the event and the attending local police had never heard of the proposals and were in fits of apoplexy making it clear they couldn't support it as its their busiest weekend of the year.


Veronica is a nce lady but she should just said she'd made a mistake and she was glad it was pointed out to her before it got messier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before it got messier. Yeah, imagine if it had somehow found its way to the national press and the council erroneously but effectively branded PCGM. Then it could have really gone off. She should def be sending you a note for saving her from that embarrassment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

""The facts of the matter are that we are currently consulting locally to see if people want a traditional fireworks display in the south of the borough. A decision on whether this goes ahead will be entirely up to them.


"Finally, the council will not be holding an event called 'The Colour Thief'. This was an earlier proposed theme - not agreed council policy - for a community event but has since been dropped.""


I'm not sure anything you assert is contradicted by Veronica's statement James?


"'The Colour Thief'. This was an earlier proposed theme" isn't a lie that you can contradict when your statement is "79 local residents heard Verionica Ward last Thursday 15 September at Dulwich library during the Dulwioch Communminty Council hear her call it The Colour Thief"


You are coming across as unreasonably obessed about this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All disputatious parties should calm down and join us in (optional)naked fire-lit revelry and drunken carousing in February at ED's inaugural Imbolc festivities (Feb.




*Sparklers will be allowed. New age dance/music/colour thievery will be allowed but is likely to be mocked. Mulled cider and flasks of Hine vsop are recommended.*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Starferjack,

The colour thief was council policy. I was only when local cllrs insisted it was daft idea on so many levels that the administration agreed to hold a public consultation.


When press interest mounted the colour thief suddenly was nothing to do with the council.


As for the colour thief being something from the past - until 8am on tuesday when the administration read the South London Press it was their plan and policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pot holes feel like they’re becoming more of an issue (based purely on my perception, don’t know what data there is). Even worse outside London imo. I suspect as Mal says, heavier vehicles are part of the problem (both SUVs, but also EVs which are generally heavier than ‘conventional’ cars), but regardless the council need to be more on it.  You can use the fixmystreet app to report them (and other street maintenance issues). 
    • Prior to the LTNs do you have many examples where the results of consultations were not acted upon? Seems to me the council is picking and choosing when they action the feedback from their constituents.......   Have you looked at the results from that, if not, tale some time to have a look, its quite enlightening..it seems the majority do not think the changes will have the desired effect....but you know it's not a refendum so the council has chosen to ignore the feedback of constituents. They must be assuming full responsibility for ignoring residents feedback- clearly they think they know what's best for us. If it all goes wrong let's see if they take responsibility!   Earl, here's a question for you (and i know you wont answer it but lets see)...why do you think the council has never asked a yes/no question to local residents about anything to do with the LTNs - wether they exist or whether we think the changes they have suggested (using our money) are needed/worthwhile? Or a consultation with a yes/no answer but we all know why. I still laugh that the council had to re-run the CPZ consultation with a yes/no answer and finally had to listen to their constituents...they took a hell of a spanking! They have been cheating the system for years and getting away with it. So does that not apply during consultations then? (P.S before you answer take a look at the definition of a consultation as provided by the Local Government Association).
    • What other matters of policy would you have decided by referendum, or is it just the one you feel strongly about? 🙄 We live in a representative democracy for good reason. After Brexit I thought this would be even clearer. We’ve had local elections since the LTN came in and those who introduced it were returned to office. You may want to revisit a debate that finished 3 years ago, but it isn’t going to happen. You need to move on. …still no one willing to defend the claims in One Dulwich’s latest missive I note. 😂
    • Please describe the missing item to me, and If the description is correct I let you know where to collect it. If noone responds I will bring it to the police in the next few days.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...