Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Willard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How about a nice Abercrombie ad campaign for you?

>

> Possible Billboard?


Why is the well-waxed guy on the right holding a fish?


On a more serious note, it would be pertinent to know how long it is proposed to be there.

If you are for or against a 10m x 7m advertising hoarding here let council planning officer [email protected] know.


The revenue from such a position may be sufficient. For the scaffolding to remain for some considerable time. Also it might set a precidence for a permanent hoarding - but as I say for or against let Southwark council officers know and really copy me as a ward councillor.



James, I find most of your posts helpful and insightful, but this has to be the biggest load of bol$$%ks I've ever read on here.


How many windows do you think the owners would like to block out with a permanent hoarding? There's plenty to chose from:


http://dulwichonview.org.uk/assets/uploads/2010/07/19899621_3a48ebc9d5-400x300.jpg

When I was one of the trustees of Bankside Open Spaces Trust ooh must be a dozen years ago I remember discussing an offer of ?60,000 for an advertising hoarding beside one of the parks we were involved with facing onto a road less busy than Lordship Lane.


So we're not talking small beer.

Nope.


I think it would be interesting to know how long this is planned to be erected for but am not against it due to timescale, more in principle.


It's ugly and unnecessary. Lordship Lane may not be the most beautiful high street in the land but it is relatively free of large scale advertising and major corporate branding. I like that. It's one of the things that keeps me shopping there.


If you want to hide scaffolding - fine. But please don't do so with a giant advertising hoarding.


And I shall make those views claer to the planning officer.

If you want to object to a planning application, write to the Planning Department at Southwark. They will consider all representations, but will only take it into consideration during the determination of the application representations which are based on planning policy grounds. Unfortunately saying "its ugly" probably wont hold much weight. If Members of the Planning Committee refuse the application on grounds which aren't based on statutory planning policy, it is likely to be successful at any appeal, at the cost to Southwark Council.

If it were just temporary, say six weeks, to cover scaffolding then there's probably no harm in it. The alternative would only be that green strong netting which would be uglier.


Could part of any permission be that the company benefitting and the advertisers make a reasonable/proportionate donation to local charities?

I can't remember what its called but the scaffolding on the building works across from Buckingham Palace looks pretty. Its got a vertical garden if that's the right way to describe it.


Maybe the forum could advertise on the new Forester's Arms billboard if it goes ahead? :))

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can't remember what its called but the

> scaffolding on the building works across from

> Buckingham Palace looks pretty. Its got a vertical

> garden if that's the right way to describe it.

>

> Maybe the forum could advertise on the new

> Forester's Arms billboard if it goes ahead? :))


It's a living wall made by these guys http://www.biotecture.uk.com/

"The consultation period for this application is not open. Please contact the case officer directly if you have any questions. " http://planningonline.southwarksites.com/planningonline2/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeResultDetail&TheSystemkey=9541857


"There are no documents available online for this application."


There will be ample opportunity when they are up to read them, consider, ask advice, discuss, make any representations. Anything submitted earlier will likely be a waste of everyone's time.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cidered Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Foresters arms? is the bishop no more?

>

> xxxxxx

>

> The Bishop was previously called the Foresters

> Arms - and a very vile pub it was too :))

>

> Unless you like the kind of place where you

> squelch over the squirly carpet and can smell the

> gents from wherever you're sitting :))



You can still smell the gents from wherever you're sitting, nothing changed there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...