Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw something quite disturbing this am!


I was in the changing rooms at work getting dressed and some old boy 60ish was also getting changed....not that I was looking! but i noticed out of the corner of my eye some bizarre shirt tucking behaviour! He tucked his shirt into his underpants!!!, and then proceded to put his trousers on!


i have never witnessed this shirt tucking into underpants method before?! does it serve some kind of purpose? Does anyone in ED do this also?


It made me crack up in the changing room...and i had to make it look like I was choking/coughing!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1994-bizarre-shirt-tucking-behaviour/
Share on other sites

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is a very disturbing thread.

> FnB, feel free to pop over to play with my wii,

> but keep your hands out of my pants!!


You two scare me..... ;-)


I was in the TA and when on parade in the summer, shirt sleave order, doing this means the shirt stay straighter, and you don;t get bollocked for looking "Like a sack of $hit tied up with string". Though something other hideous misdemeanour such as a badly ironed collar woudl see the bvollocking ensued anyway.


He might have a service history...


It's logical, but uncomfortable, I must say.


E

That's quite interesting if it does have a functional use then.


I've often wondered how some people are able to keep their shirts tucked in neat and tidy without it 'puffing' out....I may actually give this a go too now that there is a functional reason for it!

fractionater Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I may actually give this a go too now that there is a functional reason for it!


You'll be hooked for life...mark my words.....


Word of warning though, when untucking, exercise a degree of caution. It is all to easy to self wedgie if you're a bit too enthusiastic with you untucking..... =8-0

Rather that, than leaving shirts untucked. I'm talking the long sleeved variety. I have a real problem with it, no logical idea why. Perhaps it's a gay gene thing.


I used to know somebody who tucked his in, so that it wouldn't come out at the back. Remember John Forsythe from Dynasty, a secret underpant tucker-iner.

Only looks ridiculous if someone is watching you do it, or see's you take your trousers off (and you've forgotten to pull out the shirt first).


Obviously not to be done if you've scored with a young lady (not sure how it would go down in the gay community cdonline?!) and you're undressing in the throw's of passion - I think that would be a real bedroom killer!

fractionater Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Only looks ridiculous if someone is watching you

> do it, or see's you take your trousers off


Technique would be, I imagine I have no experience of such a specific situation, would be to undo the shirt from the top, (Ti*'s first I'm no slag...) while claiming "kiss my chest you mad passionate fool" and take it off without untucking it.


Then whilest said chest is being kissed you can carefully untuck it yourself while maybe uttering "Of your kisses are like Ice to my fire" to keep partner distracted...being careful of course to avoid self induced wedgie, as mentioned previously....


I hope this helps someone....

its actually an old legacy from the days of yore when washing machines were a thing of the future,and basically so a man could get the maximum of 4 days wear from a pair of jocks ie wear for 2 days then turn inside out and wear for another 2 days,tucking your shirt into said same jocks prevented unsightly skid marks from appearing on the jocks and hence staining their appearance, not very nice in the morning when parading around the house and the missus has to look at it whilst devouring her porridge. that the skid mark was transferred to the shirt tail was irrelevant as the offending article was tucked into the jocks and consequently was,nt available for anyone to see. same principle also applies if you tuck the front of the shirt in, no piss stains.

hope that clears things up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...