Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In contrast to around 2003 odds when I first moved here, I've noticed that your average rush hour train home out London Bridge now spills around 70% of its nine to fivers out at East Dulwich. As such, is there not now a clear case for an East Dulwich express train?


Southern used to run one (known locally as the "magic train") which left Lon Bridge at 5.47pm and stopped at Peckham Rye only before reaching home ground in just 8 minutes. This would cut down your commute by 4 minutes and reduce the nutter count that seems to increase with stops at South Bermondsey and Queens Road Peckham.


Just one train an hour like this would keep me happy. Anyone else agree?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/19951-east-dulwich-express-trains/
Share on other sites

So for 4 minutes off your commute, you'd like to exclude people who live around Queens Road and South Bermondsey areas from having access to 1 in 4 trains leaving/going to London Bridge?


I hope you were being ironic, because if not, you appear to have become a pretty selfish arsehole.

> I hope you were being ironic, because if not, you

> appear to have become a pretty selfish arsehole.


Now that is no way for a Lady to speak LadyD! Shame on you.... ;-)


Laden with irony.... but don't forget that Southern used to run this service, albeit once an evening. And it kept a lot of people happy. It's normal for train companies to adjust their services to cater to ever changing passenger patterns. They should, in theory, strike a careful balance between catering to the majority whilst maintaining vital services to all areas.


All I'm suggesting is that the balance perhaps needs to be readjusted to reflect the fact that there are way more commuters by volume using the rush hour service from ED and Peckham Rye than there are from QR Peckham or South Bermondsey.


Now clearly, I haven't done a passenger count but hop on any train between 7.45 and 9am and its pretty obvious.


In morning and evening rush hours we're now blessed with 6-7 trains not 4. Things have already improved. So what I'd propose is 1 train out of 7 (in rush hour only) stops at Peckham Rye and East Dulwich only (both ways) which would make for less crowding on the other services and a better commute for the majority based on current patterns. And no this is not some kind of train social exclusion policy (before anyone starts). Just common sense.


And as to nutters, no train can compete with the freebie No 12 Bus which, after hundreds of trips I can confirm to be a true "freak zone". Anyway, let me know what you think.

OP's idea is not so strange.

It's already in use for trains via Denmark Hill, where a lot of people get on/off. Some trains are non-stop to Victoria, while others stop at a number of stations in between.

I think they also use different routes, as the non-stop ones seem to take appreciably less time to get in (as well as not needing the stopping time at stations).

I would go 35 percent max. Most people getting off at ED position themselves close to the exit at the station. So those who see the carriage empty are part of that particular majority.


However, if you sit in the front carriage then most people get off at North Dulwich - and the carriage remains fairly full until then!


As for the DH comparison - DH is on a different line that feeds a number of routes into Kent. ED is on a quieter line that will also mean it misses out on the direct benefit of the new ELL extension.


I understand the theory behind this, but most London commuters would be more than happy with a 12 minute journey. Cutting it by 4 minutes doesnt really make huge a difference: the benefit to a minority is much less than the inconvenience to others.

Its only 12 minutes if you live next to the station. Also progress often comes from small steps forward, once we have 8 mins we can go lower...ED to LB in 4 mins sound good?


drew Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would go 35 percent max. Most people getting off

> at ED position themselves close to the exit at the

> station. So those who see the carriage empty are

> part of that particular majority.

>

> However, if you sit in the front carriage then

> most people get off at North Dulwich - and the

> carriage remains fairly full until then!

>

> As for the DH comparison - DH is on a different

> line that feeds a number of routes into Kent. ED

> is on a quieter line that will also mean it misses

> out on the direct benefit of the new ELL

> extension.

>

> I understand the theory behind this, but most

> London commuters would be more than happy with a

> 12 minute journey. Cutting it by 4 minutes doesnt

> really make huge a difference: the benefit to a

> minority is much less than the inconvenience to

> others.

70% of the carriage I use generally gets off at Queens Road Peckham, because we know what carriage to get in, the 1st two. You'll find 70% of the last 2 carriages getting off at South Bermondsey because they also know which carriages to get in to be nearest the station exit. Not quite sure which carriage you would get on for ED, perhaps differs with 4/6/8 carriage trains with the exit being more towards the middle of the platform but its not really suprising that the carriage the OP usually gets in spills out mostly at ED.


There's probably a reason Southern stopped the service (ok maybe giving the train co a bit much credit for sensible planning but I like to hope).


Would be quite curious to know what the destination make up od the rush hour trains is but observing from your 'usual' carriage is probably unfair.


Woah, I clearly spend way too much time on the train!

  • 4 weeks later...

I agree whole heartedly and in fact wrote to Southern about it about three years ago. I mean, no one even gets off the train at muggers central, i mean South Bermondsey. NO ONE. Southern replied that it takes ages to change time tables and they have to have meetings with the Transport department etc to do it and that a lot of their timetabling was actually inherited from British Rail.


Something does need to be done. East Dulwich is clearly the most important stop on the line - although obviously i'm biased, being a resident - and that should be recognised by the bosses at Southern.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd certainly like a train that avoided South

> Bermondsey... being crushed in a train packed full

> of lairy Millwall supporters is no fun!


This season (Aug-Apr) Millwall has only 6 midweek evening games at The Den (Millwall's ground)

So hardly a major problem.


Most trains are laid on for Away Supporters as South Bermondsey Station has a direct link to the

North Stand (Away Supporters) at the ground.


Millwall supporters cannot use this link so many avoid using the train.


As the journey from London Bridge to South Bermondsey is, what 3 minutes ???

Is that really too much to bear.


The time slot for supporters travelling to the ground is very narrow.


Millwall supporters are no different to any other football supporters


Usually in good spirits on the way to the game.

Try and share the enthusiasm.


Enjoy the moment.


Millwall Fox.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...