Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Last weekend i was talking to no.12 bus drivers. They were lamenting them turning back from bendy buses to double dekcers as bendy bus drivers are paid more. But one reason they felt sad was where would the homeless go. Apparently a aprinkling of homeless people ride each bus backwards and forwards all day.


The snits of Etherow and Friern will be delighted.

About time. I was on the 12 once when a uniformed inspector got on, went up to a young hooded gentleman who stood up to get off. The inspector asked for his ticket/Oyster etc and the young gentleman tried to get past him. The inspector asked again, the lad head-butted him in the face and ran off the bus. He was spotted by the other (plain clothes) inspector getting on a bus behind. The inspector said we'll get him at Downing Street (there's a policeman there). They must have radio-ed the bus he was on to prevent him getting off and at Downing Street the Transport Police turned up and caught the thieving little scrote!>:D
I don't have a particular problem with the bendy buses. I travel home by bus in the rush hour and double deckers are just as dirty, crowded and full of dodgy people as the bendy buses. As for the changeover there so seem to be a lot more 453's on the road since they switched over to double deckers but I'm wondering how long that will last.

tfwsoll Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't have a particular problem with the bendy

> buses. I travel home by bus in the rush hour and

> double deckers are just as dirty, crowded and full

> of dodgy people as the bendy buses. As for the

> changeover there so seem to be a lot more 453's on

> the road since they switched over to double

> deckers but I'm wondering how long that will last.


There are less buses on the 453 outside peak hours now.


http://853blog.com/2011/10/06/all-bent-up-bendy-bus-cuts-put-pressure-on-the-53/

thank the stars


does this mean that I may now get a seat on a 12 in the morning, and that the horrible Mums with babies that try and squeeze on throught both double doors when the bus is packed* will have to fold their prams up and not push everyone out of the way.


Horray - this will save TFL and the bus companies a fortune now as the non fair payers will either have to walk or pay their way (?5 gets you ?10 that over the next week anyone who uses the 12 will see people atempt to get on through the back doors and not pay !!)



(* the mums and buggies who insist that they should take the wheelchair spaces despite the fact their is not enough room to swing a ticket inspector ! - however NOT all mums are that bad, just a handful)

Perhaps the 'lack of space' (not really--double decker buses can hold up to 90+ people) might make people overcome their fear of heights/backward facing seats and go upstairs/to the back instead of congregating around the doors. If you CBA to move out of the way, don't roll your eyes or tut or worse when someone asks you to make room.

tfwsoll Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Unless you are getting on at Barry Road or Oxford

> Circus, the answer is 'no'. The double deckers

> are smaller and there will still be the same

> number of people with buggies/prams/shopping

> trolleys/luggage etc cramming into an even smaller

> space


Really? Route 12 might actually bring in revenue for TfL instead of being the 'free bus' it's become known as since the Routemasters were axed.

It might bring in more revenue but there's still the capital outlay for the new buses and wages for twice as many bus drivers. It's not the fault of the buses that they were see as a free ride in London - they seem to operate OK in Germany. In Switzerland the trams and buses have more than one door and fare dodging doesn't appear to be such a huge problem.


In any case, most of the people that bunk their fares on the 12 will still need to get from A to B so I am not sure that the change to double deckers will mean less congestion. I am sure the regular 12 commuters will find out tomorrow.

12s are empty going past peckham rye now. Didn't used to be.


Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It might bring in more revenue but there's still

> the capital outlay for the new buses and wages for

> twice as many bus drivers. It's not the fault of

> the buses that they were see as a free ride in

> London - they seem to operate OK in Germany. In

> Switzerland the trams and buses have more than one

> door and fare dodging doesn't appear to be such a

> huge problem.

>

> In any case, most of the people that bunk their

> fares on the 12 will still need to get from A to B

> so I am not sure that the change to double deckers

> will mean less congestion. I am sure the regular

> 12 commuters will find out tomorrow.

I got the 12 back last night at 3am. Normally at that time of morning I try to get on at Whitehall and its packed. Last night I was out near Waterloo so got on just south of Westminster bridge and I was able to get a seat downstairs easy which I guess is down to the increased frequency.


I did notice though that people are still treating it as a free bus. Many were getting on through the back doors then heading straight upstairs.

At most I saw 10 people on the 12 while in Peckham today, with at least 3 buses parked up in Friern Road/LL.


At the end of Rye Lane by Poundland, paying passengers were still getting on, yet still plenty of room upstairs, however as mentioned above, the real test will be tomorrow morning's rushhour.

Paid for the privilege today at around 2.00pm - bus virtually empty and chilled in a way the old bendies never were - heard some yoof on a 78 prior to that bemoaning the change. There must have been a hell of a lot of free riders if the first results are anything to by. Bit of a white ghetto now though !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But Thatcher is dead. Nobody since has brought the utilities back under public ownership (if that's the right term). So there are many people who could be blamed. Meanwhile the shareholders get richer and everyone else gets increasing bills and a poorer service. Plus as said above, a massive waste of a limited resource like water. Not to mention the polluted rivers and seas. At least the privatisation of the railways is being reversed. Hopefully water may be on the list somewhere.
    • That's really helpful. Do the Community Councils still exist? It sounds to me that whoever the contact is on the council who has sorted out the North Cross Road notice board and put the new list of councillors in it must at least have access to the key for that one? Unless it was one of the unlocked ones. And of course if somebody knows where the keys are, they may have no idea that people are looking for them or that this forum thread exists. Which are the notice boards which are not locked?  The very helpful locksmith near the station (?Callows?)  might be able to provide keys for them, or if not, new locks, in return for some local publicity? In fact, they may be able to advise in general, rather than keep trying unresponsive people at the council. But then of course there is still the question of who is going to take responsibility for putting appropriate East Dulwich community information into them and updating it as necessary.
    • Our residents' association used to have keys many moons ago, but when locks were changed, we tried everyone (including ward councillors) to get keys to no avail. A couple of boards are not locked. The Community Councils originally paid for all the notice boards in Dulwich. May have come under the Cleaner Greener budget.
    • Blame Margaret Thatcher - she started the privatization of public utilities.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...