Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jctg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Alan Medic Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Gang activity. Dead cert.

> >

> >

> > And to think you were trying a joke.

>

>

> I don't think it was a joke, it was a good guess.

> The vast majority of gun incidents in London

> probably are gang-related.



It is a current "in joke" amongst some forum users whenever there is a thread asking what is going on with the police cars down my road.

Quote

I was going past in a car at about 3.10pm and saw a man lying on the ground and there were no police or ambulances there so it must have literally just happened. I thought perhaps he had collapsed but there were people looking after him so I didn't stop. Up the road there were around 100 people just outside/inside the cemetery looking as if they were about to attend a funeral. I'm guessing the two were linked somehow?


You really should make contact with the police because you may have seen something that is important, and you might not even realise.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jctg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Alan Medic Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Gang activity. Dead cert.

> > >

> > >

> > > And to think you were trying a joke.

> >

> >

> > I don't think it was a joke, it was a good

> guess.

> > The vast majority of gun incidents in London

> > probably are gang-related.

>

>

> It is a current "in joke" amongst some forum users

> whenever there is a thread asking what is going on

> with the police cars down my road.



Or helicopters.

In response to an earlier comment: do you honestly think that youth spending cuts make a shred of difference to young people who carry guns? Surely there's many deeper and far more complicated social and cultural factors that have attributed to this gun culture we're now seeing?? Seems so easy and pretty harsh just to point the political finger.


Anyway, just to clear up a common misconception, Trident attend and investigate all shootings in London and not just those within the black community.

This is from the Met's own website on Trident


http://www.met.police.uk/scd/specialist_units/trident_trafalgar.htm


What we do


SCD8 Trident Terms of Reference


* MURDER - Trident investigates all murders by shooting involving a lethal barrelled weapon or a weapon that has been converted to be such a lethal barrelled weapon, where both the victim(s) and suspect(s) are from black communities.

* SHOOTINGS - (i) Trident investigates all non-fatal shootings or discharges involving a lethal barrelled weapon or a weapon that has been converted to be such a lethal barrelled weapon, and (ii) Any threat to police officers and other police staff, for example PCSOs, where a firearm is produced but not discharged.

* PRO-ACTIVE OPERATOINS - Trident targets those who possess, supply, convert, reactivate and manufacture illegal firearms and those who seek to use illegal firearms to prevent shootings occurring.



From this it would appear that Trident does look at all shootings, but also specifically all black-on-black (suspected) shooting murders.


Elsewhere the link quotes


Trident Operational Command Unit (OCU) is the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) response to gun related activity occurring within London?s communities, but at this time only gun related murders within the black community. The levels of violence associated with this type of criminality are extreme, with the use of firearms becoming more prevalent

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stuff this. I am going back to SE23.com. It may

> be extremely boring, but far safer than this

> forum. Up the hill I go.


Its flipping slow at the moment!

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Stuff this. I am going back to SE23.com. It may

> be extremely boring, but far safer than this

> forum. Up the hill I go.



At least no one is calling for the reinstatement of capital punishment here.

EDOliver Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In response to an earlier comment: do you honestly

> think that youth spending cuts make a shred of

> difference to young people who carry guns? Surely

> there's many deeper and far more complicated

> social and cultural factors that have attributed

> to this gun culture we're now seeing?? Seems so

> easy and pretty harsh just to point the political

> finger.

>

> Anyway, just to clear up a common misconception,

> Trident attend and investigate all shootings in

> London and not just those within the black

> community.



Well said! There are a few people on this forum that are quick to mention Trident (JCTG)! Let?s not forget that there are families out there that are devastated with yesterday events, have a bit of respect!!

Solutions?


Maybe more undercover cops to get into the gangs.

More effort on cracking gun running etc - can anything be done to make a gun rather harder and pricier to acquire than a night out?

More effort on intel to understand the dynamics of the gang market.

More funding of effective small-scale charities who work well to get kids out of gangs.

Something dramatic - probably liberalisation - on drugs to reduce the superprofits that trade currently generates.

Decent immigration control and effective removal. That won't affect the kids in the gangs, I should guess, but might affect some of the people controlling the gangs.

Tough and effective headmasters who can break gang cultures in their schools - although some gang members will respond by leaving school

Tough and effective headmasters


Are you suggesting that this is due to female head teachers? You sound just like my late father!




oh please. Headteachers if you prefer the PC lingo. Of course you can have tough and effective female heads of schools.

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And you think this is caused by uncontrolled

> immigration?



Caused directly by in the sense of if the people involved hadn't immigrated the shootings wouldn't have taken place?


No of course not.




But linked in the sense that the gangs they are likely to be involved with will themselves be involved on lots of levels with illegal immigration?


Quite likely.

unclengen


You are a man/woman after my own heart. Exactly what I would have chosen for the nasty crooks who have burgled me, attempted to steal my car (twice) and stolen from my car whilst creating a diversion. They all deserve each other.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...