Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don?t think anyone who has shown support for Amanda on here is going to vote for her because of the story she has to tell. They are showing their admiration for someone who has the guts to go out there and try to make a difference and are trying to convey to her that she can and should carry on despite her past.


What the fuck have you ever done for this world?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59543
Share on other sites

At least it had the sensitivity not to use emotive language like 'killing people's children'.


If you don't believe in redemption or rehabilitation then that's a very sad and hopeless world you live in. Perhaps the Belgian authorities should just have executed her, making the streets safe?


Enjoy your Daily Mail...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59545
Share on other sites

Maximay Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh, so was it all lies then? Oh, I'm sorry.....



Of course it's not, which is why it contains "direct quotes". However, does this, or any other person deserve to pay for their former mistakes forever?


She served time for the smuggling, and so has been punished.


Why are you so angry and unforgiving? Seriously! You could bump in to this lady tomorrow, and get on like a house on fire. Would you then drop her when you realised it was this person?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59546
Share on other sites

Oh, I'm sorry for expressing my own personal opinion on an open forum, god forbid! I have done plenty but choose not to go blowing my own trumpet! especially about such negative things when I have children to think of erm..... Brendan has obviously had personal, (very personal) links with the "lady" in question, hope you are both very happy.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59547
Share on other sites

Weve all got a past - that what makes us what we are.


Unfort. getting into politics will ensure your past will be dragged up - still, look on the bright side - yer alive & well, and unlike the other greasy Mufus in Politics, at least people will remember you - that can only be a + point...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59551
Share on other sites

Differnce being that Harriet Harman is IN office and not above scrutiny.

Amanda's transgressions are in the past and she's worked hard to rise above some very tough circumstances in her life to get herself clean, sorted and educated.

Also she's not in office merely putting herself up for it; whether she makes it is up to the electorate. The average joe in the street thinks like maximay, and I can say she won't make it into office.

Mind you average joes also try to beat up paediatricians, but that's another story.


As for putting your point of view across in a public forum, yes, we all do that here. But child killer is not an opinion, that's slander. Aspersions about her and Brendan's relationship is not opinion, from whence do you opine on that one? It's playground level 'you kissed her and she smells', that's not worthy of any public forum past puberty frankly.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59552
Share on other sites

Maximay Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan

> has obviously had personal, (very personal) links

> with the "lady" in question, hope you are both

> very happy.


That?s just puerile. I have met her yes but I don?t know her very well.


I vote on issues not perceptions. Which I suppose distinguishes me from the vast majority of the reality show devouring, corporate cock sucking, lobotomised population.


Will I vote for the Green Party? No probably not.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59553
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> reality show devouring, corporate cock sucking,

> lobotomised population.


When I start using language like this I realise that I am getting a bit too wound up.


Maximay I understand that from your, very unfortunate perspective it is less easy to be magnanimous than it is from mine. I apologise for being insensitive towards that.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59565
Share on other sites

Aw damn! my identity has been uncovered Snorky,I'd better make a swift gettaway eh! Oh well back to work to support all of those not currently in employment. (omg no....do I feel another thread coming on in support of all those poor souls not bothering to get off their fat ar*** and earn a living instead of spending all day, every day in chatrooms on various threads and on my money!) Better paste a message on the net saying that anyone can come on to this forum and express an opinion as long as it is the same as those currently running the threads!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59566
Share on other sites

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> She's not just a mate down the pub - she's putting herself forward for office folks.


Yes she is, and the story is out, and she didn't try to brush it under the covers.


However, Maximay wasn't discussing this womans ability to do a job, or even the harm this might do to the party. She was basically attacking her personally, in a very angry way.


My wife will vote green, I will not, and I imagine Amanda and I would probably disagree on a few things (and agree on others), but I still don't want to hang her like a Salem "witch" for some stuff she did years ago.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59568
Share on other sites

Indeed. But I would say a key message to rehabilitation is it doesn't automatically heal all the problems caused by your original poor choices. I suspect the message to Chav is she'll have to work five times as hard to win trust of voters. Who by the way, have every right to understand her past choices, which include a criminal record.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59578
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I recently had a utility room built, next to the kitchen. Dean Richards and his team carried out the works, they did a fantastic job. Thorough, with attention to every detail.  If you are considering an extension, refurbishment or renovation, Dean comes highly recommended.  Dean Richards  07888 651798  
    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...