Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don?t think anyone who has shown support for Amanda on here is going to vote for her because of the story she has to tell. They are showing their admiration for someone who has the guts to go out there and try to make a difference and are trying to convey to her that she can and should carry on despite her past.


What the fuck have you ever done for this world?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59543
Share on other sites

At least it had the sensitivity not to use emotive language like 'killing people's children'.


If you don't believe in redemption or rehabilitation then that's a very sad and hopeless world you live in. Perhaps the Belgian authorities should just have executed her, making the streets safe?


Enjoy your Daily Mail...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59545
Share on other sites

Maximay Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh, so was it all lies then? Oh, I'm sorry.....



Of course it's not, which is why it contains "direct quotes". However, does this, or any other person deserve to pay for their former mistakes forever?


She served time for the smuggling, and so has been punished.


Why are you so angry and unforgiving? Seriously! You could bump in to this lady tomorrow, and get on like a house on fire. Would you then drop her when you realised it was this person?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59546
Share on other sites

Oh, I'm sorry for expressing my own personal opinion on an open forum, god forbid! I have done plenty but choose not to go blowing my own trumpet! especially about such negative things when I have children to think of erm..... Brendan has obviously had personal, (very personal) links with the "lady" in question, hope you are both very happy.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59547
Share on other sites

Weve all got a past - that what makes us what we are.


Unfort. getting into politics will ensure your past will be dragged up - still, look on the bright side - yer alive & well, and unlike the other greasy Mufus in Politics, at least people will remember you - that can only be a + point...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59551
Share on other sites

Differnce being that Harriet Harman is IN office and not above scrutiny.

Amanda's transgressions are in the past and she's worked hard to rise above some very tough circumstances in her life to get herself clean, sorted and educated.

Also she's not in office merely putting herself up for it; whether she makes it is up to the electorate. The average joe in the street thinks like maximay, and I can say she won't make it into office.

Mind you average joes also try to beat up paediatricians, but that's another story.


As for putting your point of view across in a public forum, yes, we all do that here. But child killer is not an opinion, that's slander. Aspersions about her and Brendan's relationship is not opinion, from whence do you opine on that one? It's playground level 'you kissed her and she smells', that's not worthy of any public forum past puberty frankly.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59552
Share on other sites

Maximay Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Brendan

> has obviously had personal, (very personal) links

> with the "lady" in question, hope you are both

> very happy.


That?s just puerile. I have met her yes but I don?t know her very well.


I vote on issues not perceptions. Which I suppose distinguishes me from the vast majority of the reality show devouring, corporate cock sucking, lobotomised population.


Will I vote for the Green Party? No probably not.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59553
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> reality show devouring, corporate cock sucking,

> lobotomised population.


When I start using language like this I realise that I am getting a bit too wound up.


Maximay I understand that from your, very unfortunate perspective it is less easy to be magnanimous than it is from mine. I apologise for being insensitive towards that.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59565
Share on other sites

Aw damn! my identity has been uncovered Snorky,I'd better make a swift gettaway eh! Oh well back to work to support all of those not currently in employment. (omg no....do I feel another thread coming on in support of all those poor souls not bothering to get off their fat ar*** and earn a living instead of spending all day, every day in chatrooms on various threads and on my money!) Better paste a message on the net saying that anyone can come on to this forum and express an opinion as long as it is the same as those currently running the threads!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59566
Share on other sites

Maurice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> She's not just a mate down the pub - she's putting herself forward for office folks.


Yes she is, and the story is out, and she didn't try to brush it under the covers.


However, Maximay wasn't discussing this womans ability to do a job, or even the harm this might do to the party. She was basically attacking her personally, in a very angry way.


My wife will vote green, I will not, and I imagine Amanda and I would probably disagree on a few things (and agree on others), but I still don't want to hang her like a Salem "witch" for some stuff she did years ago.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59568
Share on other sites

Indeed. But I would say a key message to rehabilitation is it doesn't automatically heal all the problems caused by your original poor choices. I suspect the message to Chav is she'll have to work five times as hard to win trust of voters. Who by the way, have every right to understand her past choices, which include a criminal record.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2046-re/page/5/#findComment-59578
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...