Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not pissing vinegar, and contrary to the lies previously told about me, I'm not BBW. I'm just voicing an alternative opinion. Your attacks and deflections only serve to showcase your ignorance on this highly sensitive subject other than what the liberal, anti-white media feed you.

It was a diagnosis 'Claudia' not an insult.


'Mental retardation is a generalized disorder appearing before adulthood, characterized by significantly impaired cognitive functioning and deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors. Once focused almost entirely on cognition, the definition now includes both a component relating to mental functioning and one relating to individuals' functional skills in their environment.'


Please feel free to explain what part of that definition doesn't apply to your views 'Claudia'?


You fabricate without foundation wildly speculative scenarios to reposition the 'white woman' as the oppressed individual in this encounter, and conjure up one dimensional interpretations of international incidents to back up your prejudice.


I think "impaired cognitive functioning" just about covers that.


You imagine that an unforgivablly abusive offensive aggressive and racist verbal assault signals the right moment to air this grievance. "Deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors" just about covers that.


Your pretended hurt feelings are a thin veneer on your motivation 'Claudia', it's shameful.

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm simply trying to achieve some balance. I'm

> also appalled at the media's witchhunt of this

> woman. And although I share in her exarsperation,

> to a degree, she put her child at risk by saying

> what she said, where she said it. Because from

> where I'm sitting it looked as though the young

> man behind her was about to assault her.

>

> And yes, she was clearly drunk or high. I suspect

> the former.


Why do you say that it looked like the man behind her was about to assault her? How do you know he wasn't just going to confront her? I think it's wrong for you to judge him and assume he was going to do her any physical harm!


Her attitude was absolutely disgutsing and to speak like that infront of her own child was shocking. Just goes to show by his response that he is used to hearing that kind of language!


I am surprised she was allowed to rant for so long before being asked to shut up, there was children on the tram ffs! I think the tram driver should have stopped the tram and kicked her off. I don't think she was drunk or high just ignorant!


And Claudia I think you're wrong in saying that if it had been the otherway round that less of a fuss would have been made. It would't have been acceptable either and just as many people black and white would have been disgusted.

You're a cowardly, obnoxious liar who's uncomfortable with an opposing opinion


Where have I "fabricated without foundation wildly speculative scenarios to reposition the 'white woman' as the oppressed individual in this encounter", 'Huguenot'.


Do you condone the undeniably racist organisation I've linked previously?

I don't feel in the least discomforted by your opinion 'Claudia'. I'm disgusted by it.


You've invented scenarios where offensive white women on trams are on the verge of being attacked.


You've deliberately misquoted claims of anti-white immigration strategies to whip up racial prejudice.


You've now presented a reasonable and universally welcomed association designed to ensure equitable and even tratement for all with the pejorative term 'an undeniably racist organisation'.


Far from my own discomofort, I suspect your increasingly aggressive tone underlines an essentially weak and skulking personality who uses racism as a crutch for a fragile ego.

More lies. Seriously, unless you're doing this for your own ammusement, where have I invented scenarios where offensive white women are on the verge of being attacked on a tram?


And how does the National Black Police Association "ensure equitable and even tratement for all"? It doesn't. It's specifically designed to discriminate by furthering the interests of black policemen and women only. It's racist, and you're intolerably stupid for overlooking that.

'Claudia', here's where you 'invented scenarios where offensive white women are on the verge of being attacked on a tram':


"I'm simply trying to achieve some balance. I'm also appalled at the media's witchhunt of this woman. And although I share in her exarsperation, to a degree, she put her child at risk by saying what she said, where she said it. Because from where I'm sitting it looked as though the young man behind her was about to assault her."


Can you not remember what you said? Do you remember you wrote it down?

StraferJack & Huguenot would you lend equal support for a National White Police Association, if such an organisation existed?


Otta calling someone white trash is as racist and offensive as calling someone black trash, regardless of the term's origin.

Huguenot you're becoming desperate. Saying that it looked as though the man standing behind was going to assault her doesn't translate as he is going to assault her. If we're to go by your logic all observations are fabrications. They're not, as it stands.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...