Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not pissing vinegar, and contrary to the lies previously told about me, I'm not BBW. I'm just voicing an alternative opinion. Your attacks and deflections only serve to showcase your ignorance on this highly sensitive subject other than what the liberal, anti-white media feed you.

It was a diagnosis 'Claudia' not an insult.


'Mental retardation is a generalized disorder appearing before adulthood, characterized by significantly impaired cognitive functioning and deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors. Once focused almost entirely on cognition, the definition now includes both a component relating to mental functioning and one relating to individuals' functional skills in their environment.'


Please feel free to explain what part of that definition doesn't apply to your views 'Claudia'?


You fabricate without foundation wildly speculative scenarios to reposition the 'white woman' as the oppressed individual in this encounter, and conjure up one dimensional interpretations of international incidents to back up your prejudice.


I think "impaired cognitive functioning" just about covers that.


You imagine that an unforgivablly abusive offensive aggressive and racist verbal assault signals the right moment to air this grievance. "Deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors" just about covers that.


Your pretended hurt feelings are a thin veneer on your motivation 'Claudia', it's shameful.

Claudia Drezner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm simply trying to achieve some balance. I'm

> also appalled at the media's witchhunt of this

> woman. And although I share in her exarsperation,

> to a degree, she put her child at risk by saying

> what she said, where she said it. Because from

> where I'm sitting it looked as though the young

> man behind her was about to assault her.

>

> And yes, she was clearly drunk or high. I suspect

> the former.


Why do you say that it looked like the man behind her was about to assault her? How do you know he wasn't just going to confront her? I think it's wrong for you to judge him and assume he was going to do her any physical harm!


Her attitude was absolutely disgutsing and to speak like that infront of her own child was shocking. Just goes to show by his response that he is used to hearing that kind of language!


I am surprised she was allowed to rant for so long before being asked to shut up, there was children on the tram ffs! I think the tram driver should have stopped the tram and kicked her off. I don't think she was drunk or high just ignorant!


And Claudia I think you're wrong in saying that if it had been the otherway round that less of a fuss would have been made. It would't have been acceptable either and just as many people black and white would have been disgusted.

You're a cowardly, obnoxious liar who's uncomfortable with an opposing opinion


Where have I "fabricated without foundation wildly speculative scenarios to reposition the 'white woman' as the oppressed individual in this encounter", 'Huguenot'.


Do you condone the undeniably racist organisation I've linked previously?

I don't feel in the least discomforted by your opinion 'Claudia'. I'm disgusted by it.


You've invented scenarios where offensive white women on trams are on the verge of being attacked.


You've deliberately misquoted claims of anti-white immigration strategies to whip up racial prejudice.


You've now presented a reasonable and universally welcomed association designed to ensure equitable and even tratement for all with the pejorative term 'an undeniably racist organisation'.


Far from my own discomofort, I suspect your increasingly aggressive tone underlines an essentially weak and skulking personality who uses racism as a crutch for a fragile ego.

More lies. Seriously, unless you're doing this for your own ammusement, where have I invented scenarios where offensive white women are on the verge of being attacked on a tram?


And how does the National Black Police Association "ensure equitable and even tratement for all"? It doesn't. It's specifically designed to discriminate by furthering the interests of black policemen and women only. It's racist, and you're intolerably stupid for overlooking that.

'Claudia', here's where you 'invented scenarios where offensive white women are on the verge of being attacked on a tram':


"I'm simply trying to achieve some balance. I'm also appalled at the media's witchhunt of this woman. And although I share in her exarsperation, to a degree, she put her child at risk by saying what she said, where she said it. Because from where I'm sitting it looked as though the young man behind her was about to assault her."


Can you not remember what you said? Do you remember you wrote it down?

StraferJack & Huguenot would you lend equal support for a National White Police Association, if such an organisation existed?


Otta calling someone white trash is as racist and offensive as calling someone black trash, regardless of the term's origin.

Huguenot you're becoming desperate. Saying that it looked as though the man standing behind was going to assault her doesn't translate as he is going to assault her. If we're to go by your logic all observations are fabrications. They're not, as it stands.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm fairly sure everyone engaged with this topic will have received this email yesterday, but just in case... "To whom it may concern, We are reaching out to invite you to our upcoming Residents & Stakeholder Drop In Sessions for Gala 2026. We are hosting two drop-in style sessions (one virtual, and one in person) to facilitate more in depth conversations, allowing us to run through our plans for 2026 and to discuss how we are going to address your feedback. We look forward to meeting you in person or online and discussing our event plans for both Gala and On The Rye Festival in more detail. Evening Session (IN PERSON): Time: 6:30 PM - 8:00 PM Date: Wednesday 11th February Location: Watson's General Telegraph Lunchtime Session (VIRTUAL MEETING): Time: 12:00 PM - 2:00 PM Date: Friday 13th February We are offering 15 minute slots to speak directly with us in a virtual meeting. Please confirm your availability within this drop in period and we will confirm a time with you. You will then be sent a link directly to join the virtual session. If you would like to attend, please respond with: Your name: Your address: If you will be attending the virtual or in person meeting: Your availability for a meeting time online (if applicable): If you have any access needs so we can accommodate: We really appreciate your feedback and taking the time to attend our engagement meetings. Yours sincerely, Community Team | GALA Festival"
    • Many thanks to the woman who looked after our old deaf Miniature Schnauzer who got separated from us in the park this morning. And thank you to the man who alerted us . My husband is very relieved and grateful. If any one knows who these people are please say thank you as he didn't get their names. 
    • why do we think we have the right for the elected local council to be transparent?
    • Granted Shoreditch is still London, but given that the council & organisers main argument for the festival is that it is a local event, for local people (to use your metaphor), there's surprisingly little to back this up. As Blah Blah informatively points out, this is now just a commercial venture with no local connection. Our park is regarded by them as an asset that they've paid to use & abuse. There's never been any details provided of where the attendees are from, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's never been any details provided of any increase in sales for local businesses, but it's still trotted out as a benefit to the local community.  There's promises of "opportunities" for local people & traders to work at the festival, but, again, no figures to back this up. And lastly, the fee for the whole thing goes 100% to running the Events dept, and the dozens of free events that no-one seems able to identify, and, yes, you guessed it - no details provided for by the council. So again, no tangible benefit for the residents of the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...