Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Fair play to Haddin and Siddle for adding a bit of late entertainment. Be good if England can win in Sydney to put the correct balance on the series. What has impressed me most is the time England have occupied at the crease, a sign of increasing maturity in the team.

After wrecking England's chances to gain the World Cup, are the BBC now trying to wreck our chances of winning the series?


An unattributed slag fest...


I hope it'll get edited, the fact that it was posted at 23 minutes after midnight suggests that it'll be up for a while first.


If it does get edited, the original headline ran.. "Pietersen takes credit for Ashes triumph'.

It's a shame that KP can't resist putting his own spin on the story - "I did it for the good of English Cricket" - because most of what he says is positive and reasonably sensible.


One of the most sensible comments from journalists that I've seen was that Strauss and Flower's most significant achievement has been to get the whole team working together without trying to impose too much conformity on players who are naturally very different characters. Pietersen can be an arse but at least under the current leadership he's a team player.

I am amazed that the Brits are in such a strong position, after all the Ozzy's field a professional team,


and we usually field the pick of last years school teams.



I never thought I would comment on this thread, I feared (the hard ball) and loathed (the slow laborious nature of the game) cricket at school.

Well the selectors changed their approach a few years ago and started fielding the South Africa A side instead. It seems to be working out.


On that note, as PGC said earlier, there is a bit of a game on in Cape Town at the moment. Jaques Kallis made 324 not out batting with a Kalashnikov slug in his stomach, a broken arm and one of his legs chopped off.

(Poking my head above the parapet on probably the worst possible day...)


You can't say the Aussies don't learn anything from the Poms - since you've exhausted the SA supply we've started on the Pakistani-born to bolster our team.


Mind you, he's only the 8th test player ever not to be born in Oz. That's the same as the current statutory minimum for an England squad!

Brave man, Loz. Brave man. I think I hear the squeak of magnamity in there somewhere!


But where is everyone today on this thread? Too hung over from celebrating a magnificent victory I suspect.


All the plaudits have already been said and put better than I can but just to add that it was a triumphal performance if not a classic series. The Australians will be back so no resting on our laurels.


Congrats especially to Strauss for excellent captaining, Cook for being man of the series so soon after nearly being dropped and to Colly for a stoic test record even if he wasn't batting at his peak in this Ashes.


Bravo England. Bravo!

Oh, the best team won, no doubt. That's not so much magnanimous, but realistic. England were very good and very professional and we were a shambles.


In a funny way, having lost the Ashes, I'm glad we lost them so badly rather than lost them by a narrow margin. A good Ashes series thumping may shake things up in Australian cricket. I?ve always thought that England?s previous habit of getting smashed around for four tests and then winning the final dead rubber held them back from making the hard decisions ? the tour ended on a high and everyone in charge thought the corner had been turn only to see the same thing happen next time around.


Had we (dream on) won this last test then a final 2-2 scoreline would have meant that Australia would persevere with this lot, which would have been bad (and still, sadly, a danger). Hopefully there will be big changes from Shield level and up now. It?s needed ? the Shield has been looking more and more like county cricket of late with too much dead wood clogging up the new blood coming through.


All is not lost, we have the young talent but it just needs somebody to be brave enough to ring the changes, take the short term hit and we?ll be back a lot stronger in a couple of years.


As for England, they are a good team. I don't think they are quite as good as the Saffers, but I reckon they are number 2 in the world now, whatever the rankings say. A really good set of bowlers, but a small question mark on the depth of batting skills. There's not a good pool of available batsmen of test ability - there's Morgan and maybe Rob Key and ... that's about it. None of the recent tryouts in the shorter forms or England A seem to look test standard.


And who will replace Colly? They are actually quite big shoes to fill - solid batsman, useful 5th bowler and excellent fielder.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> And who will replace Colly? They are actually

> quite big shoes to fill - solid batsman, useful

> 5th bowler and excellent fielder.



Eoin Morgan looks a dead cert to come in as the batting replacement. He's a pretty useful fielder too and, as Colly himself pointed out, another ginger, so he's the perfect replacement. Supposedly Trott might be developed into a back-up medium pacer. He does bowl occasionally. And KP had pretty impressive bowling figures for this series...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...