Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thank you Monkey!


Yes, as a Goose Green parent I am pleased to see how well Goose Green Primary School has done.


Other schools in the area have done well too of course!


Goose Green School - 80% of students reached the expected level in English & Maths, 83% in English and 87% in Maths.

Bessemer Grange - 82% reached the expected level in English & Maths, 87% in English and 95% in Maths (wow - well done!)

St. John's - 64% reached expected level in English & Maths, 76% in English and 65% in Maths

Goodrich - 72% reached the expected level in both English & maths, 87 in English and 72% in Maths

Heber - 77% reached the expected level in both English & Maths, 87% in English and 85% in Maths

Bellenden - 100% reached expected level in English & Maths 100% in English 100% in Maths (WOW - BIG CONGRATS!)

Dog Kennell Hill - 72% reached expected level in English&Maths 84% in English 76% Maths



*edited to include Bellenden's very inspiring results too and to correct my typos!

Although there are a few exceptions, these figures seem a bit meaningless without the "value added" column that they used to have, which indicated how much children progressed between KS1 and KS2. I fear these figures largely show what the initial intake of each school was like, and in some instances, how much outside tutoring kids get, (in the case of schools with a wealthier intake who have a large no. of pupils planning to jump out of the state and into public education after year 6)

New parents - beware of the stats - I think it gives a skewed view of which schools are "the best"!

Lies, Damned lies and statistics...


Then you also have to look at the percentage of pupils with statements and on School Action Plus. A school with a higher percentage of pupils with significant needs is unlikely to get 100% of pupils through level 4 and highly unlikely to get the higher no of level 5's. Just checked and St Anthony's has 3.8% with statements or on school action plus and dulwich hamlet has 6.1%.

tomk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A major indicator for some ED parents will be the

> 'Higher Level Pupils %' - ie what % of pupils

> achieved top-level (level 5) in Eng AND Maths.

> Very interesting bit of data. Click on it at the

> top of website to order list by it.



What do you think this indicates though? Does a good score indicate that the school supports academic children well? Does it mean that it has more 'able' children on its rolls? Does it mean that the intake is more middle class?


My child goes to Dog Kennel Hill which has a goodish score (28% I think). I know that it has been criticised by ofsted for not supporting able children that well. I have had on-going battles with them to give my child more challenging reading books and tasks that challenge the more academic. I am inclined to think that the high score there is due not to the efforts of the school but of the nature of the intake and the efforts of the parents.

Prickle, being a new parent so new to all this - it sounds like you and Ofsted were in agreement about DKH that it needs to be better about challenging more academically able pupils? This shouldn't be something that you should have to fight for surely. But it may be that I am way out of touch, I left my (state) school many many years ago.
Yes, all these stats need to be read in context of a whole range of factors. One interesting place to look is the year-on-year comparsions for each school on the more detailed report about each school. This can show if a school is improving year on year - therby pointing to there having been positive improvements to teaching/standards in the school and that hopefully should continue. But again, you need to look at the school and speak to the head to see if this is true - stats alone don't prove this, they just provide an indicator.

nylonmeals Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Prickle, being a new parent so new to all this -

> it sounds like you and Ofsted were in agreement

> about DKH that it needs to be better about

> challenging more academically able pupils? This

> shouldn't be something that you should have to

> fight for surely. But it may be that I am way out

> of touch, I left my (state) school many many years

> ago.



Yes, they had an ofsted a few years back that criticised their lack of support for more academically able and I felt that it was valid. They had another ofsted at beginning of autumn where they appeared to make some progress (was a better report all round) but I'm still not fully convinced that they have addressed all the issues.


Having said that the school has a large number of SEN children and the socio-economic backgrounds of the children are very mixed. They have a lot of children with English as second language too. It is a very challenging mix and by and large the school is successful in meeting most needs. The school community is also warm and nurturing.


So it probably comes down to priorities and challenging able children comes quite low down. Perhaps the school expects the family to step up and fill in the gaps - something that we have done ? but not all families want/able to do.


The school will feel vindicated by the good score, but not the entire picture, so treat stats with caution!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Dulwich Gails
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...