Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think everything good at Spurs is down to

> Harry. With that squad and that chairman, I think

> plenty of managers could come in and keep them on

> the up.


Or completely mess up all the good work that has been done. A new manager would want to bring his own staff in and we'd lose our best players too.

I disagree about prison, too many there already and I don't think non violent criminals should be imprisoned.

IF the state finds him guilty, he should pay it all back and then some, and then be banned from working in football ever again.


If he is found Not Guilty, well that's British Justice.

I think the result will be the usual fudge - you can almost hear the summing up:


"Whilst it is clear that there were monies undeclared that should have been declared, and that the full facts of Mr Redknapp's accounts were not disclosed at the time of the initial investigation, it is far from certain that he himself was aware at the time that what he was doing constituted an offence and that there are a significant number of obfuscating factors and contradictory statements on both sides that only serve to make any decisive verdict in the case of the accused subject to opinion and hearsay and therefore nigh on impossible to reach. This court recommends the due taxes be paid with interest and Mr Redknapp not be allowed to benefit from the sales or purchase of players in the future."

Oo you calling a wheeler dealer??? I'm a f**king brilliant football manager (even if he does say so himself). OOOO you looking at at John, do you know ooo I am. I'll 'ave some of the chaps sort you arht!!!!!


'Arry must think he's in an episode of The Sweeney!! >:D<

In his legal directions, the judge said the jury could not find Redknapp guilty and at the same time acquit Mr Mandaric.


He also said that if Redknapp honestly believed, as he told the court, that tax had been paid on the money by Mandaric on the payments in the United States, he could be acquitted.


?If he honestly believed there was no tax in respect of UK tax, that provides Mr Redknapp with a defence to either or both charges,? the judge said.



Judge is a Spurs fan by the sound of things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Who was Diana Rayworth, when 'resting from acting'. Her successful career was very sadly cut short following a devastating accident. 
    • thanks Jenijenjen and all - yes, i remember walking or taking the bus from the elephant (where i was working) to Camberwell to get there.  I think Tim - who's still at Franklin's -  was there in those days, and the woman who ran the cafe!  Other food places that i remember fondly are the ones in Neal's Yard (with the Hunkin sculpture that you could put a coin in ) and the basement lunch place at the Tottenham Court Road junction with Hanway Street... 
    • Did you try the emergency number posted above? It mentions lift breakdowns over the festive period outside the advertised  times. Hope you got it sorted x
    • People working in shops should not be "attempting to do the bill in their head." Nor if questioned should they be  trying to "get to an agreeable number." They should be actually (not trying to) getting to the correct number. I'm afraid in many cases it is clearly more than incorrect arithmetic. One New Year's Eve in a restaurant (not in East Dulwich but quite near it) two of us were charged for thirty poppadoms. We were quite merry when the bill came, but not so merry as to not notice something amiss. Unfortunately we have had similar things happen in a well established East Dulwich restaurant we no longer use. There is also a shop in East Dulwich which is open late at night. It used not to display prices on its goods (that may have changed). On querying the bill, we several times found a mistake had been made. Once we were charged twice for the same goods. There is a limit to how many times you can accept a "mistake".  There is also a limit to how many times you can accept the "friendly" sweet talking after it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...