Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think everything good at Spurs is down to

> Harry. With that squad and that chairman, I think

> plenty of managers could come in and keep them on

> the up.


Or completely mess up all the good work that has been done. A new manager would want to bring his own staff in and we'd lose our best players too.

I disagree about prison, too many there already and I don't think non violent criminals should be imprisoned.

IF the state finds him guilty, he should pay it all back and then some, and then be banned from working in football ever again.


If he is found Not Guilty, well that's British Justice.

I think the result will be the usual fudge - you can almost hear the summing up:


"Whilst it is clear that there were monies undeclared that should have been declared, and that the full facts of Mr Redknapp's accounts were not disclosed at the time of the initial investigation, it is far from certain that he himself was aware at the time that what he was doing constituted an offence and that there are a significant number of obfuscating factors and contradictory statements on both sides that only serve to make any decisive verdict in the case of the accused subject to opinion and hearsay and therefore nigh on impossible to reach. This court recommends the due taxes be paid with interest and Mr Redknapp not be allowed to benefit from the sales or purchase of players in the future."

Oo you calling a wheeler dealer??? I'm a f**king brilliant football manager (even if he does say so himself). OOOO you looking at at John, do you know ooo I am. I'll 'ave some of the chaps sort you arht!!!!!


'Arry must think he's in an episode of The Sweeney!! >:D<

In his legal directions, the judge said the jury could not find Redknapp guilty and at the same time acquit Mr Mandaric.


He also said that if Redknapp honestly believed, as he told the court, that tax had been paid on the money by Mandaric on the payments in the United States, he could be acquitted.


?If he honestly believed there was no tax in respect of UK tax, that provides Mr Redknapp with a defence to either or both charges,? the judge said.



Judge is a Spurs fan by the sound of things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...