Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is great news - for those with nostalgic memories of "drinker's pubs" - who in reality only go to pubs once a fortnight for a pint and a half.


Those who harbour a strange deep-seated resentment of a local business that operated successfully for 15 years will also be delighted.


(Suspect there may be some overlap within the above.)

The Palmerston was a fantastic restaurant. So many excellent meals there over the years.


If you prefer pubs to restaurants/gastropubs then fine, maybe you'll be happy with the new offering. The place has good bones. But don't expect affordable beers, and the food will almost certainly be inferior value to it's predecessor.

So no one gives a toss about people investing, grafting and building a reputation in a non trendy area??the lack

Of loyalty here is mind boggling.


This is my ?beef?


Large chain behaving badly?


Sometimes they need to know it is not ok


The poor new manager is not responsible but he needs to-be in a position to feed back to the money boys

That the grockels have an opinion.

Absolutely right Tiddles.

"Sometimes they need to know it is not ok."

Guy running it may be a fine fellow, but what went on for him to get the boozer was wrong.

Don't expect a boycott to drive him and his chain under, but it'll be fun trying.

So a few things that have disapointed me with all of this but now the new proprietors are now advertising for staff and making claims that they are simply ?expanding? the staff and wish to welcome us to our ?familiar but spruced up local?.


It is infuriating that the new owners take locals to be fools. My custom was unlikely to go there, but now it definitely won?t given they are trying to profit from a reputation built by another business. If they had honestly said it was a new business and they wanted to welcome locals I?d have had more respect for them.


PS the website they have up on their posters hasn?t yet been registered should someone else want to get the website first.

tiddles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Its all ok! The posters in the window say The

> palmerston is only closed for a refurb and is

> reopening

> At the end of june! No mention of the spotty pig

> at all - hirrah!!


This is presumably irony? Surely.

  • 2 weeks later...

It is now Open. Have not been in yet.


I'm worried about what I might me asked to pay for a pint.


Does seem there is a lot of people dining in the evening so still 'Looks' like a restaurant.


Think I will await feedback from EDF users.


DulwichFox

derwentgrove Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Been in twice since the soft opening on Friday

> night and am encouraged by the extent of the

> continuity.


Wow, so they are totally trading off the business and reputation of the Palmerston with that menu. That makes me even less inclined to go in, but appreciate you posting.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?24 is steak money. If I pay that for a roast,

> it'd better be one of the best roast beef and

> yorkshire puds I've ever had.



Its by a long stretch the most expensive pub roast i have ever heard, and i thought Youngs were bad with their ?17.00 offerings. In fact, it costs even more than Hawksmoor, a much celebrated steak restaurant renowned for top quality roasts too.


On the basis of these prices, i will likely never step foot in the place, and will advise others to do likewise. Anywhere that is clearly ripping off their customers deserves to be boycotted.

I agree, the prices are total lunacy. The food may prove to be utterly divine which it unquestioningly would have to be but, for my money, you get a sublime roast at The Rosendale in W Dulwich for 15 quid. So I guess that's where I'll be going.

Humdinger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fishbiscuits Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ?24 is steak money. If I pay that for a roast,

> > it'd better be one of the best roast beef and

> > yorkshire puds I've ever had.

>

>

> Its by a long stretch the most expensive pub roast

> i have ever heard, and i thought Youngs were bad

> with their ?17.00 offerings. In fact, it costs

> even more than Hawksmoor, a much celebrated steak

> restaurant renowned for top quality roasts too.

>

> On the basis of these prices, i will likely never

> step foot in the place, and will advise others to

> do likewise. Anywhere that is clearly ripping off

> their customers deserves to be boycotted.



?24 for a roast dinner when going rate at most pubs is around ?15...they're having a laugh!!!

that means a Sunday lunch for 4 with a bottle of wine will be well over ?100-do they know they're not in Chelsea???

Even west end places are cheaper than this.

sounds like a total rip off!!!

We won't be bothering to go.

Great shame as we loved the Palmerston for a Sunday get-together with friends now and again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some  TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...