Jump to content

Recommended Posts

watch the skies!! i live in sydenham and work on the borders of forest hill/sydenham / dulwich


on saturday 15th december, my work colleague and i witnessed a ufo sighting and caught it on my mobile phone. this happened at 7.10pm on 15th december.


has anyone else in the area seen strange things in the skies recently in this area? i am intrigued.


statement of events..."we were at work. this happened on saturday 15th december, 2007 at 7.10pm. the sky was clear. my colleague alerted me to a military helicopter outside. it appeared to be chasing several ufo's. the helicopter was a black military helicopter. we watched for 5-10 minutes as the helicopter investigated. there was a "static" ufo that was there for about 5 minutes (this later just vanished. there were also several other smaller lights darting around it. one was flashing at orange and bright blue colour in 3 second intervals. this video was taken using a samsung mobile phone- this video does not do justice to what we saw. the bright light in the middle is obviously a street light. you can't see the helicopter on here because it had no lights on at all! but you can clearly hear it. the one to the right is the stationary white orb.

the light in the middle is clearly a street light. the light to the right of it is the stationary white orb....note the other strange objects darting around it.


after about 10 minutes, the helicopter and the strange lights just disappeared in a flash and all the commotion was over! weird.


please note, this video contains swearing..


http://youtube.com/watch?v=fi6zqcisam0


i want to hear from anyone else who has seen strange things in the sky in this area.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/2196-ufo-sightings-in-the-area/
Share on other sites

It is the Foxton?s mother ship.


They are actually an alien race slowly taking over Britain one high street at a time.


Why do you think the spiky-haired fucksticks all look so similar? They have a machine that churns out human looking earth exploration ships for the aliens who are actually small worm like creatures. The aliens control these ?agents? (as they call them) from a control centre situated in the bottom. This is why when speaking to one you get the distinct impression that they are talking out of their arse.


There are a few other clues. Notice how they are the only ones who can sit comfortably on the chairs in their office. They have strangely articulated backs you see.


They will also only take off their jackets within the confines of their earth-base (office) or in their transport pods (mini coopers). Their jackets are a type of life jacket that helps them survive. If you run up to one when it is making its shifty-eyed way from the office to the car and rip its jacket off the following happens. The estate agent will turn red in the face, start hurling obscenities and foaming at the mouth and then stiffen, soil itself and keel over stone dead. Having been ejected out of the bottom the alien worm will then be teleported to the mother ship and sent back to Alpha Centauri without any commission.


You should try it. It?s terrific fun.


Some call me crazy but I am just telling it like it is folks.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...