Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Shops going to the wall is a sad fact of life. My father and I had a shop in Meeting House Lane in Peckham in the 70's and early 80's which was doing well until Sainsburys and Safeway came along and it all went tits up. I think unless people change their shopping habits, small businesses going to the wall will be an everyday occurence.

Lots of action thanks - why do you have a list or some point system, some people can not even get out of there houses or have mental health issues does that mean that if they do not physically participate they do not count ? Everyone does there own thing in there own way. This idea that if you go to a meeting you own it and everything to do with it is a very middle class concept? There are thousands of people dong things everyday, to picking up litter or talking to kids about their attitude, it is all relevant.


And as for house prices in ED are worth more thats a joke. Dulwich village has gone up ED has gone up and Nunhead has gone up it's all relative.


And the private sector has done what to ED ? Er what Jo Jo maman Bebe, Foxtons the White Stuff or Northcross Road - which incidently is where the real change in ED began - A small parade of eclectic shops, now a weekend market street.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do have to agree that the council could spend

> their time and money on a lot of things other than

> the bloody fence at Goose Green.


Such as what to improve Nunhead and its shops?

It' not for a council to improve shops, but I'd say Nunhead Lane and the little Green there are more in need of attention than Goose Green which has been done up not too long ago.


There are many many parts of Southwark more in need of a facelift than anywhere in ED.

I'm not disagreeing with you, I'm just trying to find out what Nunhead needs and what action should be taken but it seems to be an ignored question. According to the gospel that is Wikipedia: "This neighbourhood presents an outward picture of calm, tree-lined streets, and has not been in the headlines as an area of concern" but AllforNun give the impression that its an inwardly collapsing shithole, how can that be stopped?


Mind you it does have a pub called the Pyrotechnist's Arms and the Nun's Head so it does sound like the scene of fatal accident.

It's called the Pyrotechnicists Arms because it stands where an old Firework factory used to be. And there was a nunnery where the Old Nuns Head now stands.


And I do not suggest it is an inwardly collapsing shithole, that?s out of order.


It's doing ok - we have some new businesses, the new frog on the green deli, the restaurant, and the little butchers has changed hands and the guy is trying really hard. It would be nice if the council weighed in with a clear plan/vision and some kind of financial incentives


The regeneration team were supposed to move from Bellendon to Nunhead years ago so what has happened? And now we are in a period of consumer uncertainity the lane has been left out cold in the coming storm. They could also offer some oportunites to new busnesses and see who knocks on the door. Maybe even advertise the area to people who want to start something but are being outpriced in ED.

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And I do not suggest it is an inwardly collapsing

> shithole, that?s out of order.


I apologise, it's just that you frequently mention about how Nunhead's been forgotten and ignored by councillors and you make it sound all doom and gloomy over there.

AFN Do you really want Nunhead to be another Bellenden/ED. It already has its own unique character, some good housing stock, a several good shops, pubs, cafes, village green and superb cemetery. Do you really want it to become "poncified" with expensive shops full of tat, endless organic baby shops, gastropubs on every corner, residents priced out of their homes and woe betide a Foxtons! Take Alans example and be proud of what you've got.

Thanks mark _ it's not doom and gloom , but is has been left out and promises have been broken.


And no loozyloz we do not want it to be anything other than Nunhead with it's own unique character. ED has retained character throughout the regeneration of the last 8 years and has more than enough spirit to fight of harmoginisation.


It's not about gentrification/poncification, house prices have long since gone from 155000 to 420000+ for a terrace so things have already moved but there is a mix of housing stock anyway.


There is a local business forum being set up and it is working hard, so things are moving but they need some support as well. There are a number of empty shops at the moment and lots of developers are circling, we do not want a high street full of flats, 2 shops already have nice double glazed flat doors, very sad and signed of by local council. Once it starts all the interesting businessess will fold.

Why not start a Nunhead Forum like downsouth did for West Dulwich and see how your neighbours feel and perhaps garner their support for positive action if that's what they want. Lets face it, most of us on the EDF couldn't give a toss about Nunhead.

I give a toss about Nunhead, I think it was the bible that said "Everybody needs good neighbours ... because neighbours become good friends"


anyway, I'm working on http://www.nunheadforum.co.uk at the moment, a few technical problems but I'll let people know when it's ready

LozzyLozz we could not really give a toss about you over in ED to be honest although the high street, shops, traffic, schools, train and bus services and crime we do care about !


We also care about the Lib council spending all the money in ED to shore up their power base while the surrounding areas get left to their own under funded devices.

Bloody Nunheadians!


I didn't say "I" didn't give a toss. I often buy fish at Sopers which I prefer to Moxons and sometimes pop into Ayres and amble around the cemetery. Haven't found much else of interest though and it's not easy to park which is probably why shops don't do that well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...