Jump to content

Deeply unfashionable groups who have a decent body of work...


Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Also, Salsaboy's a fan I know....

>

> Level 42

>

> The first Album is excellent and plenty of decent

> singles afterwards


Wings of Love predates their first Album, one of the best things Level 42 has ever done.


eta: typo - changed as to has.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I think Rubettes is just taking the piss, maxxi.

> Next you'll be saying The Osmonds.


No but I would say Gary Glitter/The Glitter Band if the word 'decent' hadn't been used in the thread title (is there a LESS fashionable band anywhere?)... though 50 million American sports fans can't be wrong surely?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sparks anyone?



Sparks were always 'in' in a weird kind of way - who didn't have a copy of Kimono My House?


Camel probably belong in a sub-group with Wishbone Ash.


What about Nazareth? Never really fashionable except in 'Not quite Deep Purple but-' circles but some good songs.

maxxi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wings.

>

> And if Mud are being claimed along with Slade (too

> cool surely? especially in their original skinhead

> incarnation) and the truly never-fashionable

> Showaddywaddy then what price The Rubettes? (would

> you believe 9 albums??)


Yeah I second The Rubettes ( & honest they were nearly my first choice)


I saw them in Liege in 1975


Did you know their 'blue hat' look was based on Gene Vincent


Nette:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • Is it lame? Or is it Lamey? (sorry)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...