Jump to content

the Alcohol question


TheArtfulDogger

Recommended Posts

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mid you, people who are having a bottle or two of

> pouilly fum? with dinner most nights a week who

> some of those with early onset liver disease.


Fallen off the wagon El Pibe? Sounds like you've had a couple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> maxxi Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > As for a UK drinking culture - there are parts

> of

> > the former USSR and E. Europe where the

> > ridiculously cheap price of vodka means

> > alchoholism is widespread and people drink it

> for

> > breakfast.

>

> I've had vanilla vodka for breakfast before,

> swigged straight from the bottle. Was staying in

> a caravan with my younger brother in the Outer

> Hebrides at the time.



This is near enough to the Baltic to count, mano girtas degtinė-pusryčiai girtavimas ponia draugas!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another one agreeing with ???? that it is the drinking culture that is the problem not the price of alcohol. Wine and beer is much much cheaper in most Western European countries - in Germany you can get a good bottle of Riesling for ?4.00 and a crate of 24 beers for about ?16.00 and although drinking is going on in these ccunties I've not seen the excesses that I see here. It is considered 'uncool' to be legless and no-one wants to ruin their carefully thought out outfits by vomiting over them or collapsing in a dirty gutter.


I also remember a post on here a couple of years ago where someone pointed out that most countries have much higher levels of alcohol that can be drunk before going beyond recommended levels. Even recently the units recommended went up for 14 and 21 to 21 and 28 and back down again.


However the smokers have been more or less good and clobbered - time for another section of society to be under attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Wine and beer is much much cheaper in

> most Western European countries - in Germany you

> can get a good bottle of Riesling for ?4.00 and a

> crate of 24 beers for about ?16.00 and although

> drinking is going on in these ccunties I've not

> seen the excesses that I see here.



A cut&paste production from Deutsche Welle...

Germany is one of the heaviest alcohol-drinking nations in Europe, placed fifth after Luxembourg, Hungary, Czech Republic and Ireland. Alcoholism is a significant problem in Germany, according to Peter Lang, head of drug prevention and abuse at the German Center for Health Education.


"It's difficult to say what is causing this, because alcohol is more or less an accepted drug in a lot of circumstances, like for parties or other social occasions," Lang said.


"If you compare Germany to countries like the US, there is drinking in public that is different and more accepted. Consuming alcohol during the day is really more accepted here in Germany," he added.


Most recent data shows that that 1.7 million Germans are dependent on alcohol and need treatment, whilst, 2.7 million use alcohol in a harmful way.



ETA: (in the interests of cultural balance - a French report from 2005)


The French government has been urged in a report to "snap out of its state of national denial" and take urgent steps to "denormalise drinking".


Herv? Chabalier, a leading journalist and former alcoholic who wrote the report, said: "In this country we have always, culturally, looked at alcohol through a magnifying glass: we just see the good side, never the fact that ... drink is the third greatest cause of avoidable deaths in France."


Mr Chabalier presented his report, Alcoholism - The Simple Truth, to health minister Xavier Bertrand yesterday. He said alcohol was directly responsible for 23,000 deaths a year in France, and indirectly responsible for a further 22,000.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My parents encouraged me to drink from an early age as they felt that people who starts drinking later in life do not do so responsibly. I wonder if anyone else thinks along the same lines?


I do find it strange that the Tories, who always accused Labour of being interferring nannies, produced their own nanny state policy on alcohol. Whatever happened to their mantra - personal responsibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There is no equivalence between One Dulwich purporting to be a local organisation speaking for local people, and actually properly constituted organisations such as The Dulwich Society. A 3 -second google search reveals the openly published names of the trustees of Dulwich Society, so I can make my own mind up as to whether these individuals are coming at local issues with a particular slant. I can read minutes of their meetings online, and whilst I might not agree with their every position, I can have confidence that they are an open and fundamentally democratic institution. There is absolutely nothing similar in terms of publicly accountable information to be found about One Dulwich - no idea of who is behind it, who pays for it ( it is clearly expensive), and on what basis they make their decisions.  Given the Police involvement in the intimidation of people with a public pro-LTN view ( for which there is no equivalence in terms of severity of any incident for those with an anti-LTN point of view), I can fully understand why, for Dulwich Society's traffic sub- committee only, they want a bit of online anonymity. I also find it slightly disturbing that when The Dulwich Society current leadership asked the 'grouping' pushing for changes within it for a meeting to discuss their concerns, they refused it. Given the recent experiences of organisations such as The National Trust, the question can be asked - is something similar going on here?   
    • I’ll post it to the DVLA if i don’t find the owner by midweek. 
    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...