Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Who pays for the Goose Green festival?


If it's all of us through council tax then it should have more than to attract people than it did last time.


No reason why they can't have 2 hour slots for different types of music to last all day. Should keep everyone happy.

I am very sad to hear this news i wondered where you guys had gone i for one used to love your trips around the area it always put a smile on my face if the yummy mummy brigade don't like it they should take a hike they have ruined this area gone are the days when people used to have their speakers out on the streets on a sunday afternoon i miss those days it was brilliant. There are too many rules and regulations as long as it's not all day everyday and locks down at a reasonable time what harm is it doing really. I had a party for my son a number of years ago the music was not loud at all and yes the kids were quite excited playing party games some parents stayed at collection time and had a glass of wine or beer in the kitchen the last person left at about 9pm and i had one crazy neighbour complaining about the noise and how i was ruining the peace it was a childrens birthday party for gods sake i have never once complained about her karoke girly nights in once a week as i think everyone should live a little sometimes really people need to take a chill pill.

Muley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> in case we upset the cup cake and aerobics

> brigade

>

> Personally, I'm suspicious of anyone using the

> condescending term 'brigade' as a means to

> belittle those with opposing views, clearly meant

> to dismiss those who disagree as a mindless,

> herd-like collective whose values are without

> reason or intelligence.

>

>

>

>

>

> What are you, a Daily Mail reader?


Sorry Sly and Reggie - you've fallen foul of the bed wetters, vegetarians and househusbands currently staging their cappuccino coup in ED.

Your brand of crazy/amusing meanderings sends the "let's have a waitrose!" brigade into a swoon.

Big up S&R!



Hold on there northlondoner, I just commented that using the term 'brigade' to dismiss anyone who holds different opinions is supercilious, and to my mind this devalues the point being made. If you don't respect the views of others, why should they respect yours?


The Daily Mail reader comment was just a joke.


That's what my post was actually about, but of course only a vegetarian, bed-wetting househusband would be bothered about showing a little respect to others, no?

Muley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Hold on there northlondoner, I just commented that

> using the term 'brigade' to dismiss anyone who

> holds different opinions is supercilious, and to

> my mind this devalues the point being made. If you

> don't respect the views of others, why should they

> respect yours?

>


> The Daily Mail reader comment was just a joke.

>

> That's what my post was actually about, but of

> course only a vegetarian, bed-wetting househusband

> would be bothered about showing a little respect

> to others, no?


Actually, your post seems eminently measured and sensible. Not quite sure why I quoted it in mine. Early morning crankiness and tiredness, I suppose. Or perhaps I'm losing whats left of my mind. Apologies !

Be careful guys your middle class ED dub may just be illegal


Concerns about the festival and the way in which it was policed inspired the legislation which developed into the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.[5] This wide-ranging Act effectively made illegal such outdoor parties that played music, which was defined in section 63(1)(b) to include "sounds wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats."


http://dulwichonview.org.uk/assets/uploads/2009/10/sly-reggie.jpeg

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Be careful guys your middle class ED dub may just

> be illegal

>

> Concerns about the festival and the way in which

> it was policed inspired the legislation which

> developed into the Criminal Justice and Public

> Order Act 1994.[5] This wide-ranging Act

> effectively made illegal such outdoor parties that

> played music, which was defined in section

> 63(1)(b) to include "sounds wholly or

> predominantly characterised by the emission of a

> succession of repetitive beats."

>

> http://dulwichonview.org.uk/assets/uploads/2009/10

> /sly-reggie.jpeg



They were trying to describe house music with this bill as an answer to the free party/ rave 'problem' in the early 90's. I guess reggae can also be "characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats", so can most genres. Surely this was a relevant act when electronica was new and therefore easy to pick out from all other types of music but now it seems a bit ambigious; can you imagine being in court and having either side arguing the toss over the legal definition of 'repetitive beats'??

It was more about giving the police the powers to crack down on the raves Castlemorton being the Daily Mail watershed for middle England - something had to be done. I was quite an activist back then took part in a trespass at Michael Howard's house, invaded Chequers , and camped out at Twyford Down and on the roof at Claremont Road anti-M11. ED was a cheap bohemian enclave back then with bohemians,low-lifes and a gritty community and cheapish houses and the legendary ED Comedy Club.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...