Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Who pays for the Goose Green festival?


If it's all of us through council tax then it should have more than to attract people than it did last time.


No reason why they can't have 2 hour slots for different types of music to last all day. Should keep everyone happy.

I am very sad to hear this news i wondered where you guys had gone i for one used to love your trips around the area it always put a smile on my face if the yummy mummy brigade don't like it they should take a hike they have ruined this area gone are the days when people used to have their speakers out on the streets on a sunday afternoon i miss those days it was brilliant. There are too many rules and regulations as long as it's not all day everyday and locks down at a reasonable time what harm is it doing really. I had a party for my son a number of years ago the music was not loud at all and yes the kids were quite excited playing party games some parents stayed at collection time and had a glass of wine or beer in the kitchen the last person left at about 9pm and i had one crazy neighbour complaining about the noise and how i was ruining the peace it was a childrens birthday party for gods sake i have never once complained about her karoke girly nights in once a week as i think everyone should live a little sometimes really people need to take a chill pill.

Muley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> in case we upset the cup cake and aerobics

> brigade

>

> Personally, I'm suspicious of anyone using the

> condescending term 'brigade' as a means to

> belittle those with opposing views, clearly meant

> to dismiss those who disagree as a mindless,

> herd-like collective whose values are without

> reason or intelligence.

>

>

>

>

>

> What are you, a Daily Mail reader?


Sorry Sly and Reggie - you've fallen foul of the bed wetters, vegetarians and househusbands currently staging their cappuccino coup in ED.

Your brand of crazy/amusing meanderings sends the "let's have a waitrose!" brigade into a swoon.

Big up S&R!



Hold on there northlondoner, I just commented that using the term 'brigade' to dismiss anyone who holds different opinions is supercilious, and to my mind this devalues the point being made. If you don't respect the views of others, why should they respect yours?


The Daily Mail reader comment was just a joke.


That's what my post was actually about, but of course only a vegetarian, bed-wetting househusband would be bothered about showing a little respect to others, no?

Muley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Hold on there northlondoner, I just commented that

> using the term 'brigade' to dismiss anyone who

> holds different opinions is supercilious, and to

> my mind this devalues the point being made. If you

> don't respect the views of others, why should they

> respect yours?

>


> The Daily Mail reader comment was just a joke.

>

> That's what my post was actually about, but of

> course only a vegetarian, bed-wetting househusband

> would be bothered about showing a little respect

> to others, no?


Actually, your post seems eminently measured and sensible. Not quite sure why I quoted it in mine. Early morning crankiness and tiredness, I suppose. Or perhaps I'm losing whats left of my mind. Apologies !

Be careful guys your middle class ED dub may just be illegal


Concerns about the festival and the way in which it was policed inspired the legislation which developed into the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.[5] This wide-ranging Act effectively made illegal such outdoor parties that played music, which was defined in section 63(1)(b) to include "sounds wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats."


http://dulwichonview.org.uk/assets/uploads/2009/10/sly-reggie.jpeg

ibilly99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Be careful guys your middle class ED dub may just

> be illegal

>

> Concerns about the festival and the way in which

> it was policed inspired the legislation which

> developed into the Criminal Justice and Public

> Order Act 1994.[5] This wide-ranging Act

> effectively made illegal such outdoor parties that

> played music, which was defined in section

> 63(1)(b) to include "sounds wholly or

> predominantly characterised by the emission of a

> succession of repetitive beats."

>

> http://dulwichonview.org.uk/assets/uploads/2009/10

> /sly-reggie.jpeg



They were trying to describe house music with this bill as an answer to the free party/ rave 'problem' in the early 90's. I guess reggae can also be "characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats", so can most genres. Surely this was a relevant act when electronica was new and therefore easy to pick out from all other types of music but now it seems a bit ambigious; can you imagine being in court and having either side arguing the toss over the legal definition of 'repetitive beats'??

It was more about giving the police the powers to crack down on the raves Castlemorton being the Daily Mail watershed for middle England - something had to be done. I was quite an activist back then took part in a trespass at Michael Howard's house, invaded Chequers , and camped out at Twyford Down and on the roof at Claremont Road anti-M11. ED was a cheap bohemian enclave back then with bohemians,low-lifes and a gritty community and cheapish houses and the legendary ED Comedy Club.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...