Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't Martin Luther King make a speech in which

> he said "I have a dream that one day down in

> Lordship Lane, East Dulwich, Marks and Spencer

> will open a food store"?


Yes he did.. But it was ONLY a Dream :)


Foxy

Apology accepted. We can't be expected to know all things at all times.


DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> yeknomyeknom Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Emmeline Pankhurst and Martin Luther King might

> > not agree with you.

> >

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Things never change for the better..

> > >

> > > DulwichFox.

>

>

> I apologise..

>

> I did not know that Emmeline Pankhurst and Martin

> Luther King were advocates for a M&S on Lordship

> Lane East Dulwich.

>

> DulwichFox

I won't miss Iceland in the slightest. My freezer is already full of crap I never get round to eating before having to chuck it away and I got over black forest gateau and tiramisu in about 1985.


If it's M&S, fine (although I'd rather have a larger version of the ED Deli back). If not, I hope whoever moves in is not an estate agent, a betting shop or a pound shop chain.


Really don't give a monkeys about whether there are flats or offices above it - either way it will clearly be an improvement on what is there now, I think.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

I

> hope whoever moves in is not an estate agent, a

> betting shop or a pound shop chain.

>



I think pound shops are brilliant - I recently got some really nice (though small!) rugs in one for a pound each. They often have excellent bargains.


I'd love to see one in ED.


Not going to happen though, is it?


I will miss Iceland's excellent free range eggs at a pound for six, and some of their frozen stuff.


I no longer rate their fresh veg though :(

Sue wrote:


"I think pound shops are brilliant - I recently got some really nice (though small!) rugs in one for a pound each. They often have excellent bargains.


I'd love to see one in ED.


Not going to happen though, is it? "


Is AJ Farmer a bit too posh for you then, Sue? ; )


You can always go to Rye Lane for pound shop tat - it's not far. It's got the proper authentic pound shop smell too. Oh, and an Iceland.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well if they did have a Pound shop in East

> Dulwich

> Everything would be a Fiver.

>

> Foxy


ha - you made me laugh Foxy.


Just shows you, there is a first time for everything.

Pound shops do see some "tat", but they also sell a lot of brand name stuff for a quid, it's great.


But many would rather pay three times as much for the same item because they couldn't lower themselves to go in a pound shop. Let them waste their money.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well if they did have a Pound shop in East

> > Dulwich

> > Everything would be a Fiver.

> >

> > Foxy

>

> ha - you made me laugh Foxy.

>

> Just shows you, there is a first time for

> everything.


You should laugh more often Mick. It's good for you.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Well if they did have a Pound shop in East

> > > Dulwich

> > > Everything would be a Fiver.

> > >

> > > Foxy

> >

> > ha - you made me laugh Foxy.

> >

> > Just shows you, there is a first time for

> > everything.

>

> You should laugh more often Mick. It's good for

> you.


I thought you had retired....

I shall miss Iceland and all its bargains and the friendly staff too. When you're short of a few bob and you need to stock up on essentials Iceland has always been a good place to go to where your pounds can stretch that bit further. Not everyone in East Dulwich is loaded and I'm sure I'm not the only one who shall miss the convenience of it being there on Lordship Lane.

It's the suggestion that Iceland is only there for 'poor' people is the very reason it has been

stigmatized by some who have suggested it is an eyesore.


I do not use Iceland primarily to save money. I use Iceland when it is convenient, often just popping in

when out and about on Lordship Lane. The staff there are indeed friendly and helpful with a more personal touch.


I cannot see any replacement being able to give that personal touch and I will be sad to see it go.


DulwichFox

I will miss Iceland too. I dislke shopping but the great thing about there is you can get in and out quickly and get whatever basics you need. I will especially miss their spicy bean burgers. As for it being an eyesore, I do think it's shop branding (if that's what it's called) doesn't look great.Something about the colour.


I've also found the staff to be particularly friendly, though on my last visit I was shortchanged by a checkout lady who I'd never seen before. I always pay with cash and she somehow registered ?25 on the till instead of the ?30 I gave her. There was no arguement once I and the people next in the queue pointed this out. Still, it made me wonder.


I don't consider myself 'poor' as I always eat and drink, but it is better value to me than the Coop down the street which seems very expensive on the few visits I've had there.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's the suggestion that Iceland is only there for

> 'poor' people is the very reason it has been

> stigmatized by some who have suggested it is an

> eyesore.

>

> I do not use Iceland primarily to save money. I

> use Iceland when it is convenient, often just

> popping in

> when out and about on Lordship Lane. The staff

> there are indeed friendly and helpful with a more

> personal touch.

>

> I cannot see any replacement being able to give

> that personal touch and I will be sad to see it

> go.

>

> DulwichFox


Perhaps this comment sums things up


Re: Revised new - M&S planning application to replace Iceland..

Posted by richard tudor 13 December, 2012 09:32


Perhaps ED people believe they are in the film Independence Day. Went to bed one night living in their perfect fashioned world and next morning, it all changed.HELP


Iceland is always mentioned but it was there long before many people moved in when not being able to afford elsewhere.


Whilst it is welcome for the area to improve do not ignore the requirements of others. Rather like the old days of moving to a country village because it was cute and then doing all in ones power to make it over to to where they came from. People make an area not prissy shops.

Mustard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> They do very reasonably priced frozen spinach,

> which I cannot find in Sainsburys and other places

> It's very useful in cooking, for lots of recipes.

> Their fish fingers, butter, milk and cheese are a

> bargain.


http://www.sainsburys.co.uk/wcsstore7.07.1.143/ExtendedSitesCatalogAssetStore/images/catalog/productImages/70/0000000512770/0000000512770_L.jpeg


Sainsbury's Chopped Spinach 1kg Buy any 2 for ?2.50


All the Supermarkets sell frozen spinach ..


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...