Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Are people still fighting about this? The car wash causes more traffic than the M&S ever will.


As for all the fouth floor fuss, there's already a large plant level on the current building that I bet few have ever noticed. Im all for protecting heritage and public environments, but the level of nitpicking NIMBYism on this issue is ridiculous.


Take a look at the plans for the railway cottages, now these really ARE unacceptable.

It's a high street. There's been a retail outlet with car park on this spot for decades, longer than many of the current generation of residents have been living there. What do you expect, fields?




KoolBananas Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> healey Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Christ are people still moaning about this? The

> > car wash causes more traffic than the M&S ever

> > will.

>

> Added together...

>

> Sheesh use your brain!

healey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a high street. There's been a retail outlet

> with car park on this spot for decades, longer

> than many of the current generation of residents

> have been living there. What do you expect,

> fields?

>

>

>

> KoolBananas Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > healey Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Christ are people still moaning about this?

> The

> > > car wash causes more traffic than the M&S

> ever

> > > will.

> >

> > Added together...

> >

> > Sheesh use your brain!


You are simply demonstrating your, and many others, lack of understanding of the plans, site AND history of all of this.


I wonder how many people have caught on to another application to the site (15/AP/3994) for a free standing substation to be position right near housing - surely this should have considered on all the other plans?

yes, I saw that. What the heck? They really are taking the p now but, no doubt, planning and Councillor hands will be tied by some bit of small print.


On another note, I do wish those that thise that pass comment, dismissing objections, would at least try to look at the detail and history behind this series of applications. Again, there is a pair of huge metal bollards, over 6ft high one of which has been wrecked and bangd out of line by one of the old Iceland delivery trucks, because there has never been enough room for them to properly navigate the very small entrance. Note a resident had their wall wrecked, and another had the side of their car taken off by one of these large vehicles.


There will now be more delivery vehicles, many more people using the site than before, and having reduced available space once they now intend to reduce it further by adding in a substation. A RIBA architect amongst others has signalled that there are major health and safety issues attached to earlier applications, let alone this one, yet what do Southwark and our Councillors do? Nothing, absolutely nothing.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fazer did you receive info of this:

> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1mDmNmG3RjPLLdS0X7

> 49JyGtqmhpT3nYq06x_7kTRgLA/viewform



No.


For the record I don't think a planning system which is driven by neighbours jobsworth planners and local politicians is fit for purpose.


Planning rules should be designed clearly to remove confusion and fantasy.

Perhaps a general discussion about the parlous state of the planning system should have its own thread, but can we keep duscussion here to this specific site, there are serious issues around this.


What is James Barber's view about the latest addition of this substation?

Angelina, yes the car wash is unpopular and a real pain...it also uses one heck of a lot of water, as you'd expect, as well as seriously blocking the street with cars oarked up waiting for service ( often on yellow lines, but there is a 'close' relationship with parking wardens who are regular visitors). Thus far the car wash owner has been unwilling to sell, it is a prime spot after all. However, once the retail unit is up and running no doubt the owners can name their price.

Hi XIX,

The decision didn't go to committee quickly enough. That's what has happened.


Hi fzer71,

Southwark and the UK have huge numbers of new homes with approved plans. The developers then sit on those approved scheme until they choose to build them. The problem isn't with the planners. The problem is no land taxation. So land banking in a rising house price market makes more sense for many developers than actually building them.


Hi KalmietyKel,

The new substation is surprising at this stage. I've seen something like this where a new lift was installed. So I suspect the extra lift provision to the proposed new additional floor is driving this.

Imagine if this was a "housing association" development.


It would be several floors higher as ugly as sin and be backed by the local politicians and planners to the hilt!

The local objection would be buried.


Double standards.


Planning joke!

James, so what was the reason for the decision not going to committee quickly enough?


This is a long- running saga. I cannot imagine planning and councillors were unaware, especially since you and colleagues had asked for it to be called in. How can something like this fall between the crack?


You were all caught out last time, it looks bad that something similar has happened again. Is this an 'accident' to spare blushes when the thing gets through, so everyone can say that although the application breaks planning policy and is dodgy around health and safety that it was taken out of your hands by glitches in process?


It could almost be read that the application will get through by the back door, just like the last one did and perhaps that was always the plan?

Many thanks for your response James.


But is that it? just, 'that's what happened'? I'm sure you can appreciate that for those affected by this development these things are extremely frustrating. It feels like your response above is pretty dismissive/uninterested and its a surprise for you to be so unforthcoming, given that previously you have been so vocal/active/helpful on this issue.


And what about the letters of consultation that were seemingly never sent? Has any explanation been given as to why this did not happen?


Thanks

XIX Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >... The council, by its own admission, made a proper

> hash of the earlier application/decision; I really

> hoped/thought that might be set right for the

> remainder of this case, but it appears not.

>

>

Why did you think the Council/Councillors would set anything right?

Because some expressed a degree of contrition for the way that the case had been handled when the previous application was approved and I therefore assumed that they would wish to ensure that it is handled properly from that point on.


But what has happened here is really quite bizarre.


James, grateful for a response on my questions above, thanks.

  • 1 month later...

There is now much steel work in progress at the rear of the old Iceland building covering most of the old car park.

The new store is going to be almost twice the size of the old store.


The concern will now be to some that shoppers will try parking in Chesterfield Grove.. More congestion.


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...