Jump to content

Recommended Posts

*group hug*


Too much one upmanship and wikiedpeia C&P points scoring bludz & theres a bad vibe on teh streets of the hood innit - some soldier is gonna get shanked for disrespekting our hard won right to vote innit


lets save our hate for those who deserve it


The Royal Family


Nick Clegg


Thatcher


Richard Branson & the former members of Genesis


Apple

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/23408-too-much-hate-in-the-lounge/
Share on other sites

Woodrot - you only provide a binary choice Love or Hate. Most of us are too nuanced for that, so why not propose a scaled approach?


1 = Consuming Hatred


10 = Uncritical Love


With ZERO (0) to represent the "frankly I don't give a damn" position.


For your list my scores are:


The Royal Family The Queen - 8, the rest 5


Nick Clegg 0


Thatcher 8


Richard Branson 6


Former members of Genesis 0


Apple 7


And to add a few more:


Ken Livingstone 2


Arthur Scargill 2


New Nexus 2


Stalin 2


Hitler 1


Katie Price 0

A Hate Index?, good work MM!!!


I'm having a think and I'm clearly mellowing in my old age, the royals on masse barely register a 6, Queenie earning herself a 7 for unselfish if rather dull service over the years despite my instinctive republican leanings, though Charlie probably gets a 4.


Tories in a general principal sort of way potter between 5 and 6 though I'm sure I can muster one or two to go lower, ditto labour.


Galloway, he could probably get a 3 in good company with premiership football.


Katie Price is a 0 though what she represents is pretty much 2.


Paying booking fees on gig tickets (at a per ticket basis gggnnrrrrrrrkrkkhkrhrr!!!) is the only thing I can think of that gets a 1.


Oh, and Tony Blair obviously.

Bob Crow and the RMT: 1 (assuming the meter stops there. Else -99)


Camilla: 8 (the lady is just class in her dignified silence)


Ken: 7 (glad he lost the election, but do have a soft spot for him)


Ed Miliband: Meh. High on the Don't-Care-O-Meter. I mean, I'm not sure he actually exists.


The Guardian: 3 or 7, depending on what day it is and what stupid/smart opinion they have posted today.


Judge Judy: 9


Microsoft: 7 (when I am using Word)


Microsoft: 2 (when I am using Excel 2007)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Community payback already exists   https://www.gov.uk/community-sentences/community-payback
    • Thanks for that - none  of mine  have been Mordena - whilst vulnerable cat, think I will just take my chances… Will be having flu though - certainly not by choice - much prefer not to but in vulnerable group.. Avoided them until last year…. Luck of drawer if you are as sick as fog  or just sore arm … assume - god knows - that flu jab is same throughout country.       
    • Wow, that is what it costs for one prisoner. So they get full board and lodging, 24 hour  monitoring  in over populated prison, we are led to believe, minimum exercise, assume a tv in each cell provided - in USA it is together with wash hand basin and c toilet - some have showers as well.   Clearly this amount of money takes  into account overstretched and overworked prison officers, protection for them, counselling which is, in my opinion a bare minimum dealing with prisoners in all settings. Do if Sweden can look outside the box, why can’t we? Or are we just not bothered at all / read statistics some where that reoffending is normal and to be frank, with economy as it is at the moment re employment, cost of living and homelessness..not surprised they reoffend to get back inside - food provided, roof over your head - much better than street living, mixing with wrong crowd, trying to get roof over your head, find a job where 90 % won’t employ you as been inside..
    • @beansprout The Swedes seem to have a useful strategy with regard to offenders  which has reduced repeat offending.  I agree that prison time for minor offences is a complete waste of time. Even worse is that prisons are "colleges of crime" where inmates learn about how to be do crimes and worst of all, become exposed to drug taking. I wouldn't advocate having chain gangs as in the USA but some strategy for getting them into say manual work under supervision might be useful - especially if it came with a modest wag. This would be significantly cheaper than the £51,100 it costs per year for  keeping one in jail.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...