Jump to content

'Prince' Andrew


carlafindle

Recommended Posts

Trying to think of anything I would trust to that man. I wouldn?t even get him to hold my beer.


How he is/was a trade ambassador is a mystery. Why any charity has him as patron is a mystery. Why anyone invests in his hare-brained schemes is a mystery. Surely now people will see the emperor?s new clothes for what they aren?t?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trying to think of anything I would trust to that

> man. I wouldn?t even get him to hold my beer.

>

> How he is/was a trade ambassador is a mystery. Why

> any charity has him as patron is a mystery. Why

> anyone invests in his hare-brained schemes is a

> mystery. Surely now people will see the emperor?s

> new clothes for what they aren?t?


Apart from knocking around with a (ex) nonce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Captain Marvel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He's a repellant, lying, sweaty shitbag but apart

> from that, I'm not sure what he's done wrong


Isn't the allegation essentially "non-consensual sex"? I honestly don't know if he's guilty of that or not, but it certainly sounds "wrong".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite an easy swap, he goes to the US to give evidence and in return Anne Sacoolas comes back to the UK to stand trial for manslaughter (US citizen who used diplomatic immunity to flee after she had hit and killed a motorcyclist, whilst she was driving on the wrong side of the road). I'm more bothered/shocked by the latter story.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Marvel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He's a repellant, lying, sweaty shitbag but

> apart

> > from that, I'm not sure what he's done wrong

>

> Isn't the allegation essentially "non-consensual

> sex"? I honestly don't know if he's guilty of that

> or not, but it certainly sounds "wrong".


No, so much more obviously which is why is being stood down from all royal "duties". You would hope that he is also being removed from the Civil List as he shouldn't be paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite an easy swap, he goes to the US to give

> evidence and in return Anne Sacoolas comes back to

> the UK to stand trial for manslaughter (US citizen

> who used diplomatic immunity to flee after she had

> hit and killed a motorcyclist, whilst she was

> driving on the wrong side of the road). I'm more

> bothered/shocked by the latter story.


I agree

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BM13 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Quite an easy swap, he goes to the US to give

> > evidence and in return Anne Sacoolas comes back

> to

> > the UK to stand trial for manslaughter (US

> citizen

> > who used diplomatic immunity to flee after she

> had

> > hit and killed a motorcyclist, whilst she was

> > driving on the wrong side of the road). I'm

> more

> > bothered/shocked by the latter story.

>

> I agree



Totally agree with this.


Louisa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There?s something dodgy about that photo that I

> > can?t quite put my beetroot-stained paws on

>

>

> Maybe the hands around the waist of a 17 year old,

> maybe?


Yet legally that's not a problem even if you're a teacher (as long as they aren't under your care)


https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/nov/15/tribunal-awards-700k-to-headteacher-sacked-over-gay-dating-app-activity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > fishbiscuits Wrote:

> > --------------------------------------------------

> > Isn't the allegation essentially "non-consensual sex"?


> No, so much more obviously


What, specifically? That the Virginia Giuffre thing is just the tip of the iceberg, and that he was actually a part of a child sex ring?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > keano77 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > There?s something dodgy about that photo that

> I

> > > can?t quite put my beetroot-stained paws on

> >

> >

> > Maybe the hands around the waist of a 17 year

> old,

> > maybe?

>

> Yet legally that's not a problem even if you're a

> teacher (as long as they aren't under your care)

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/nov/15/

> tribunal-awards-700k-to-headteacher-sacked-over-ga

> y-dating-app-activity



His defence of ?I don?t recall that photo being taken? is breathtaking. He then goes on to say ?yes that is me? or something to that effect. And whether the girl is in his care or not, she?s 17 years old.


I also agree Maxwell is as deeply in it as him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...