Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Trying to think of anything I would trust to that man. I wouldn?t even get him to hold my beer.


How he is/was a trade ambassador is a mystery. Why any charity has him as patron is a mystery. Why anyone invests in his hare-brained schemes is a mystery. Surely now people will see the emperor?s new clothes for what they aren?t?

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trying to think of anything I would trust to that

> man. I wouldn?t even get him to hold my beer.

>

> How he is/was a trade ambassador is a mystery. Why

> any charity has him as patron is a mystery. Why

> anyone invests in his hare-brained schemes is a

> mystery. Surely now people will see the emperor?s

> new clothes for what they aren?t?


Apart from knocking around with a (ex) nonce

Captain Marvel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He's a repellant, lying, sweaty shitbag but apart

> from that, I'm not sure what he's done wrong


Isn't the allegation essentially "non-consensual sex"? I honestly don't know if he's guilty of that or not, but it certainly sounds "wrong".

Quite an easy swap, he goes to the US to give evidence and in return Anne Sacoolas comes back to the UK to stand trial for manslaughter (US citizen who used diplomatic immunity to flee after she had hit and killed a motorcyclist, whilst she was driving on the wrong side of the road). I'm more bothered/shocked by the latter story.

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Marvel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > He's a repellant, lying, sweaty shitbag but

> apart

> > from that, I'm not sure what he's done wrong

>

> Isn't the allegation essentially "non-consensual

> sex"? I honestly don't know if he's guilty of that

> or not, but it certainly sounds "wrong".


No, so much more obviously which is why is being stood down from all royal "duties". You would hope that he is also being removed from the Civil List as he shouldn't be paid.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Quite an easy swap, he goes to the US to give

> evidence and in return Anne Sacoolas comes back to

> the UK to stand trial for manslaughter (US citizen

> who used diplomatic immunity to flee after she had

> hit and killed a motorcyclist, whilst she was

> driving on the wrong side of the road). I'm more

> bothered/shocked by the latter story.


I agree

BM13 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Quite an easy swap, he goes to the US to give

> > evidence and in return Anne Sacoolas comes back

> to

> > the UK to stand trial for manslaughter (US

> citizen

> > who used diplomatic immunity to flee after she

> had

> > hit and killed a motorcyclist, whilst she was

> > driving on the wrong side of the road). I'm

> more

> > bothered/shocked by the latter story.

>

> I agree



Totally agree with this.


Louisa.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There?s something dodgy about that photo that I

> > can?t quite put my beetroot-stained paws on

>

>

> Maybe the hands around the waist of a 17 year old,

> maybe?


Yet legally that's not a problem even if you're a teacher (as long as they aren't under your care)


https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/nov/15/tribunal-awards-700k-to-headteacher-sacked-over-gay-dating-app-activity

cella Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > fishbiscuits Wrote:

> > --------------------------------------------------

> > Isn't the allegation essentially "non-consensual sex"?


> No, so much more obviously


What, specifically? That the Virginia Giuffre thing is just the tip of the iceberg, and that he was actually a part of a child sex ring?

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > keano77 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > There?s something dodgy about that photo that

> I

> > > can?t quite put my beetroot-stained paws on

> >

> >

> > Maybe the hands around the waist of a 17 year

> old,

> > maybe?

>

> Yet legally that's not a problem even if you're a

> teacher (as long as they aren't under your care)

>

> https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/nov/15/

> tribunal-awards-700k-to-headteacher-sacked-over-ga

> y-dating-app-activity



His defence of ?I don?t recall that photo being taken? is breathtaking. He then goes on to say ?yes that is me? or something to that effect. And whether the girl is in his care or not, she?s 17 years old.


I also agree Maxwell is as deeply in it as him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I really don’t want to be a complainer, but mail is definitely no longer arriving in SE22.
    • I would recommend Lucasz - he responded to our request very quickly, gave us an excellent quote and cleaned up after himself. Will definitely ask him to do any future jobs. 
    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...