Jump to content

Group of teenage boys & girls near East Dulwich station & up towards Dog Kennel Hill (Lounged)


Recommended Posts

Well, I grew up in rural Nova Scotia near the ocean and you couldn't pay me to return to live there frankly! Yes, it's cleaner and there is less violent crime - but young people were pretty disaffected, bullying was rife in the local school, it had the highest incidence of teenage pregnancy, and the so called friendly and close knit communities was actually riven with petty disputes. Gossps ruled the roost, everyone knew your business and racist/sexist/homophobia was rife.


Give me dirty ole London anyday thank you very much! Bullying and intimatidation of teenagers by there peers is everywhere - it's horrible but I don't think that if you move somewhere else, you'll escape it.

On the subject of safe places to live. I was brought up in West Sussex where each village had a gang and would

threaten to terrorize the next village's disco on a Friday night.

I prefer the safety of East Dulwich.

falcao Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Someone said in an earlier thread that groups of

> teenagers have been seen in the East Dulwich area

> and they definitely look like they're not from the

> area. How do you spot that then?


i was going to ask exacting the same

Keef Wrote:

The simple fact is that you get

> horrible bullying little shits wherever you are,

> and unfortunately dealing with it is part of being

> a teenager at school.


But by and large, teenagers didn't carry knives etc, when we were at school.

Exactly right! Although a problem may seem big, your vast vast vast majority of teens are just normal teens getting on with being moody pains in the arse. The ones that might carry knives are a very small minority.


When I was at school there were kids who would carry knives, it just seems to be more news worthy these days.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

it just seems to be more news worthy

> these days.


Because they use them more regularly. Sorry, but I work with drug users and on the peripheary with gang members and the levels of violence and violent crime have increased hugely amongst the young.

Just because ?It is worse in other places.? or ?It was just as bad back in my day.? or ?I?ve lived in a crime free place and it was boring.? Doesn?t mean we should tolerate crime of any sort or at any level. If one person is mugged in 5 years that is too much.


Where does the tolerance end? I?ve stood at the gravesides of too many friends and relatives to want test that boundary.


This is why I have a problem with the narrow minded ideology that is western liberalism and get annoyed when people pigeon hole me a liberal. It seems to imply that I subscribe to a whole lot of short sighted idiocy. I don?t tolerate misogyny, nepotism or racism. Why should I tolerate violent crime?

In response to ratty


Perhaps, but the fact remains that your average kid has nothing to do with all this. I doubt numbers have changed much at all in terms of personnel, but maybe they think a lot less before actually using a knife these days.


For the record, I work with a lot of teenagers in pretty shitty areas too, so I'm not just making stuff up as I go along.

ratty Wrote:> Because they use them more regularly. Sorry, but I

> work with drug users and on the peripheary with

> gang members and the levels of violence and

> violent crime have increased hugely amongst the

> young.


Indeed. Trust me, life as a teenager is pretty perilous these days. People are naive if they don't realise that, and that it impacts on East Dulwich.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps, but the fact remains that your average

> kid has nothing to do with all this. I doubt

> numbers have changed much at all in terms of

> personnel, but maybe they think a lot less before

> actually using a knife these days.

>

> For the record, I work with a lot of teenagers in

> pretty shitty areas too, so I'm not just making

> stuff up as I go along.



Where I work (E London) Knife crime and violent mugging amongst young people is a real problem, and on occasion young people are threatened with guns too. You're not telling me that Peckham is any better!! Only a short bus ride away.


Your "average kid" isn't carrying a weapon, agreed... but they sure run the risk of running into someone who is!

I think there were actually more knives around a generation ago than there are now. Everyone seemed to have one (of one kind or another). I even had one myself. I'd spend the afternoon chucking it at a tree like a fool, trying to get it to stick in.


The difference now is that there are a very small minority who are much more willing to stick them in a person, rather than a tree. And such cases, fatal or otherwise, always make the press.

I don't know if Pechkam is better or worse than where you work. I do know that there is no need to scare monger and make out like the streets of Peckham are like some 80s Bronx gangland, because I can absolutely promise you, Peckham was a lot lot worse years ago when the North Peckham estate was known as "Front Line", and there was regular gang warfare.

Edinburgh was the murder capital of Europe a few years ago and recent stastics showed that per capita you are still more likely to be stabbbed there than here.

Interesting, as it came out top place to live in the recent Channel 4 programme.


Not sure what my point is but I think there is one somewhere.

It's a certain group of kids. Influenced by money, rap music and being a bad boy. "The world owes me" / "Untouchable" / "I can have what I want" attitude. When I see kids behaving in such a way, I'm not afraid to show my disgust.


What these kids need are role models. Another option is to do it the old fashioned way, a good clip around the ear!

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The liberal pussyfooting around a (the?) major but

> unmentionable issue on this forum is hilarious



what can you mean?

liberal pussyfooting around in the Guardian

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
    • How long is a piece of string? AI was a bit rubbish on this one, but Checatrade : average cost to paint a house exterior is around £30 per square metre So depends on the size, access, time to put up scaffolding and cost of hiring and building that, surface preparation, and quality of materials.   Checkatrade put it at £2.5 k for average semi, that sounds a little cheap.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...