Jump to content

Recommended Posts

rachp Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> alice Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So it?s just a coincidence that the main

> > beneficiaries are those in the wealthier part

> of

> > our borough?

>

> In ED and DV it is hard to avoid wealthy streets

> isn't it? Is Melbourne Grove an outlier in ED? And

> Rye Lane is not wealthy. I don't know where else

> in Southwark this is happening, I'm assuming not

> only in Dulwich as it's a London wide initiative.



It's a UK wide inititive the same conversations are happening in Swansea, Cardiff, Newcastle etc.


At the heart of it - you can perhaps blame Grant Shapps

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/07/18/closing-narrowing-roads-cycling-revolution-leads-campaigners/

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rah

> Won't the extended ULEZ improve the environment ?

>

> I can see the glory grabbing now

> Southwark saying we done good reducing pollution

> by blocking streets and the mayor saying the same

> by reducing older polluting vehicles (despite the

> environmental cost of building new cars being

> higher than keeping older cars running)


The environment is more than just carbon. There's definitely a benefit to not pumping disease causing particulates and NOx into the air in a very high population area.






womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> when/who is going to occupy the space in Dulwich

> Village at the end of Court Lane- pop up pizzas?

> fish n chips? cocktails?


champagne and oysters

I don't know where else in Southwark this is happening, I'm assuming not only in Dulwich as it's a London wide initiative.


Walworth Road and the estates around the back of it have had a fair bit done. Similar thing with planters.

https://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/covid-19-legislation-sees-major-road-changes-including-car-free-junctions-new-cycle-lanes-and-traffic-bans-outside-schools/


Southwark News website (linked above) is worth keeping an eye on, quite often has quotes from councillors. There's also a link to the Streetspace page for comments.

I can't ever fathom the resistance from the pro-motoring lobby to transport planners suggesting that people on foot or bikes might get priority, or that people maybe don't store their own private property on the roads.


And these are emergency measures, taking place nationwide. That's why there was no lengthy consultation.

We're in a pandemic, which is what prompted all of this stuff.

If you ask people if they would mind awfully not driving their car somewhere, they tend to say no.

enjoyed a quick glass of wine outside Rocca this afternoon. Constant flow of traffic, irate drivers hooting, fumes, and general unpleasantness, that was my experience. Still, I anticipate it will improve dramatically in September


dulwichfolk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The traffic in dulwich village seems to have

> reduced a fair amount.

>

> Doesn?t this imply the majority of the issues are

> school related?

I drove through the village yesterday between 6-7pm and traffic was stacked up from the Dulwich Village junction (Before that) and East Dulwich Grove. Not many cars got through at dv junction when lights were green as too much traffic. So to me it didn?t seem quiet on the streets, at least not at that time! I was stuck In traffic for quite some time.

Went through DV junction early this morning and noticed all of the planters had been vandalised.


I'm hopeful One Dulwich with their well resourced cabal of digital astroturfers will be quick to condemn this kind of vandalism.

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hear it might be made into a skateboard park, so

> young people have a space of their own...

It is already being populated by skateboarders, in the evening. Lovely sound. Grinding and slapping the boards.

Apart from about twenty homes, no one at all is benefitting from the closure. The bottom of Court Lane and the base of Calton Avenue after Woodwarde Road are the only places to lose traffic. But instead everyone else is coping with rat runners, cyclists going too fast because they think it is their space now, displaced traffic and random out-of villagers who say how nice it is and who cares about well off people in SE21. I would love it if all these fans of the new system would say where they live when they are making all their anti-Dulwich, pro-cycling and closure comments. All those people photographed saying how great the new system is are those who can walk without a problem, but I know so many old people who are not going to be able to move out and about locally without their car and then having vast diversions.

Just wait until the next phase is introduced - see if it makes a POSITIVE difference to residents. I'm hoping it does, but fear it will not.

I am benefiting from it far away in Eynella Road. The reduction in Court Lane "short-cuts" by through traffic has reduced the continuous stream of cars and vans on that road to zero and increased the cycling/pedestrian traffic to 50 from 5 or less. Eynella traffic was negligible so the junction with Lordship Lane was safe and good-tempered.




Metallic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apart from about twenty homes, no one at all is

> benefitting from the closure. The bottom of Court

> Lane and the base of Calton Avenue after Woodwarde

> Road are the only places to lose traffic. But

> instead everyone else is coping with rat runners,

> cyclists going too fast because they think it is

> their space now, displaced traffic and random

> out-of villagers who say how nice it is and who

> cares about well off people in SE21. I would love

> it if all these fans of the new system would say

> where they live when they are making all their

> anti-Dulwich, pro-cycling and closure comments.

> All those people photographed saying how great the

> new system is are those who can walk without a

> problem, but I know so many old people who are not

> going to be able to move out and about locally

> without their car and then having vast

> diversions.

> Just wait until the next phase is introduced -

> see if it makes a POSITIVE difference to

> residents. I'm hoping it does, but fear it will

> not.

Sally Eva Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am benefiting from it far away in Eynella Road.

> The reduction in Court Lane "short-cuts" by

> through traffic has reduced the continuous stream

> of cars and vans on that road to zero and

> increased the cycling/pedestrian traffic to 50

> from 5 or less. Eynella traffic was negligible so

> the junction with Lordship Lane was safe and

> good-tempered.

>

>

>

> Metallic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Apart from about twenty homes, no one at all is

> > benefitting from the closure. The bottom of

> Court

> > Lane and the base of Calton Avenue after

> Woodwarde

> > Road are the only places to lose traffic. But

> > instead everyone else is coping with rat

> runners,

> > cyclists going too fast because they think it

> is

> > their space now, displaced traffic and random

> > out-of villagers who say how nice it is and who

> > cares about well off people in SE21. I would

> love

> > it if all these fans of the new system would

> say

> > where they live when they are making all their

> > anti-Dulwich, pro-cycling and closure comments.

>

> > All those people photographed saying how great

> the

> > new system is are those who can walk without a

> > problem, but I know so many old people who are

> not

> > going to be able to move out and about locally

> > without their car and then having vast

> > diversions.

> > Just wait until the next phase is introduced -

> > see if it makes a POSITIVE difference to

> > residents. I'm hoping it does, but fear it will

> > not.


That's because the cars are going further down Court Lane and cutting through. Try living further down Woodwarde Road and especially when all the Foundation schools come back.

Metallic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know so many old people who are not

> going to be able to move out and about locally

> without their car and then having vast

> diversions.



As far as I can see every resident can still park near their home, drive away from their home and return to their home? There's such massive entitlement at play here.

The closure of the dulwich village junction is pushing a lot of traffic through the middle of the village and when I have the door of my shop open which I like to do in the summer and during current times I cannot hear anyone on the phone or anyone in my shop. The buses and music etc is overwhelming. Similarly in Peckham where I live the buses have been moved off lordship lane and are now on my street also increasing the noise levels and pollution. I don't see it as massive entitlement; the traffic won't just disappear but will increase and it will affect a lot of businesses where there is movement around the area for example flower deliveries, funerals, interior work for measures and dry cleaning vans.

thebestnameshavegone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Metallic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I know so many old people who are not

> > going to be able to move out and about locally

> > without their car and then having vast

> > diversions.



>

>

> As far as I can see every resident can still park

> near their home, drive away from their home and

> return to their home? There's such massive

> entitlement at play here.


This is nothing to do with entitlement.You buy or rent a house, get old and need to use your car for shopping or social/medical use. Do you honestly deny it doesn't add loads of time to a trip? Anyone want to go with an older person while they choose their fruit and veg, then carry it home for them? Thought not. Too busy. In the afternoons the tailbacks to Dulwich Village are long and slow, lovely for all those people who live and walk there.

thebestnameshavegone Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Car ownership declines massively post 50/60 in

> London (TFL'S own data)

>

> These sound like Schodinger's old people -a

> demographic who are in a small minority being

> wheeled out to make convenient points.


Funny

Post 50 people seem to be able to afford to buy the e-type / classic they desire when they were younger so potentially car ownership over 50 goes up

Post 70 and maybe due to poor eyesight and other health issues ownership goes down in my experience

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...