Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am a bit sad these days to see Brtiney's problems in all the magazines...Just got the idea she should escape LA to move here in east dulwich. I am fine to take her in, i have a study room she can sleep in. I think it would be her perfect retreat in our lovely and quiet area, far from paparazzos from LA. What do you think my dear neighbours?

Isn't Amy a bit of an easy target? And if we look at the old-skool legends (your Keef Richards et al) isn't Amy just a modern version.. She lives as she sings, by and large, and has gone a bit too far and needs help


Britney on the other hand - hmm. I'm never happy with the Little Miss Sunshine (great film btw) world where parent's push kids into "stardom". See also pretty much any of the Jacksons. But despite risque early singles Britey has portrayed a "wholesome" image which was untenable. As it falls apart I feel for the human being - but the values that put her there may be under a smidge more scrutiny


I said as soon as she had an early single out - was it something like "Lucky"? - that she was in trouble. I don't think someone that young in that position has many real allies

I feel so sorry for Britney (not enough to employ her as an au pair you understand), she was virtually sold into slavery by her mother, and has genuine paralels (how am I to be expected to spell that damn word with drink taken?) with Michael Jackson. Amy on the other hand I feel sorry for because she will be finding it hard to work out who her real friends are, and is probably receiving threatening emails from people who are clearly local to her. She is probably feeling genuinely threatened. It is Amys children I feel sorry for, they didn't ask for any of this, and who will come to Freya's birthday party? (hic...thud...crash)...

Amy's lifestyle is something ppl look up - I have a friend who live on the floor below her and he thinks her "madness" is incredibly kool, even the odd stuff she does. Yes I know I quite clearly have strange friends... but apparently, according to many a person in the gay community, she is much respected. Whereas... Britney... does anyone really care about her? :s

Tis a strange world we live in.


*wanders off munching toast*

Why does it matter if people respect her or not, she's a human going through a crap time. Agree with the parents pushing her in to stardom bit, which reminds me, Amy's dad is a knob, he was moaning about her being done for possession as it might hurt her career in America... so she should be above the law because she's famous? I make no judgement about people doing drugs, but don't moan about it if it comes back and bites you in the arse!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...