Jump to content

The Begging Bowl


kels

Recommended Posts

standswithfist Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> antantant Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > They just tweeted that the Evening Standard are

> > coming to review tomorrow...

>

> this was posted on the 31st Aug


What does this mean?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the BB have been very wise to stay off the

> forum, rather than get involved with this

> clusterfuck of a thread.



I can't agree with you. The fact that they seem to be sanctioning someone who posts vile messages is very suspicious and makes me think this person is involved with the BB. If that was my business I would make some sort of statement to distance myself from them. I guess it must be Jamie Younger from the Palmerston who is involved with this venture as he also owns the Herne.


There have been several threads on the Palmerston in the past few years which did not portray them in a good light. One was started by Food Stories.

annabel42 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As the Evening Standard review came out only

> today, I doubt whether Gidget would have been

> posting on it four days ago and I, for one,

> certainly did not see any posts by Gidget on that

> review. You did, however, on the 5th September

> refer on this forum, to the Evening Standard

> review, which appeared only today.

>

> Would you care to answer Gidget's question as to

> how you knew yesterday what was going to be in the

> Evening Standard today?


Jesus Christ? I read the ES review from the online link provided by Taper on this forum at 11.20am on the morning of 5 Sept some 4 hours before I replied to your post and some 2 hours before you thanked Taper on this forum for providing it! Giddyaunt posted several misinformed posts about the ES review questioning its impartiallity-check back and look-if you cant see anything get down to Specsavers (and no, this is not an endorsement, before your accusations start flying) No I wont post you a copy of SN review-check their website or contact them yourself if you are that interested. All the best.

Giddyaunt - I now getting very fed up with your snide slurs and accusations which you continue to make from behind your computer. Would it please be possible for us to meet up for a pint and you can say what you want to say to my face? I will certainly repeat all I have said to you and more to your face. If not, please do not publish any more slurs or accusations about me.
I am sorry to hear that. I suffer with mild cerebal paulsey which can affect my ability to properly percieve events in their correct sequence and my spacial awareness. Might I suggest you get someone who is able to read all the postings to you in date and time order and who is able to explain what they mean and their relevance to the subject in question before you start writing stupid comments that make you look like a complete imbecile. All the best

Sorry to get back to the subject in hand but I went to the Begging Bowl last night.

Lovely atmosphere and helpful and friendly staff. I had a mojito (with Thai Basil), others had wine, we tried squid, gurnard, rabbit, duck, tofu, sirloin steak and broccoli stir fry. All gobbled down except for broccoli which we found too salty. ?22 each for a thoroughly enjoyable evening.

So , is it a good time to visit the begging Bowl, whats the food like. and when can i book a ring side seat for the "BIG FIGHT LIVE" between Giddyaunt and IJJ1963, i can order some brockley and sling it at them. i hope this all stops soon ,may be it would nice if you both book a table for two and talk to each other like men , settle your arguments , and PISS OFF . my name is Morgan Freeman

Tillie, I think Giddyant/giddy aunt is Gidget, and IJJ1963 is a bit confused.


IJ... sorry your posts were met with such hostility, but you have to understand that this forum has a long history of fake recommendations, so your incredibly enthusiastic tone set the alarm bells ringing. But calling someone a nonce, and offering to meet them mano-a-mano is just childish and embarrassing. You should really stop.w

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...