Jump to content

Recommended Posts

fishbiscuits Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If Corbyn had been in charge, we'd be in exactly

> the same situation. The only difference is that my

> social media would be full of posts praising our

> PMs leadership, compassion, etc...


There are a few on mine who consistently praise Boris. I remember a government minister (could be Cleverly) a few years ago mentioning that a load of pro government twitter accounts would be coming online the next week - which makes me suspect there's a government bot factory out there :)

I love the impartial nature of this thread

In an area (and on a forum) that largely voted for labour then of course Boris won't be seen to be doing anything right.


But he is being advised by leading scientists, top virologists, experts in their fields and heads of NHS. Some are civil servants but all would be giving exactly the same words of advice regardless of who is in power, be it Tory's , Labour, Lib Dem or the Monster Raving Loony party.


Advice is listened to, cabinet, cobra and sage meetings are held where the advisers are invited to speak and yes the government in power then acts (or not) on the advice.


Kier has the advantage of hindsight , but let's be honest would he have made the same decisions if Labour won the last GE ? My feeling is possibly as he would have been getting exactly the same advice and the leader of the Tory's would be doing the same to try and bring Labour down. Politics is political after all.


The care home issue is a difficult one, the majority are private companies charging an arm and a leg to look after people who are more often than not at the end of life. They have their own procurement people with strong links to the medical and pharmaceutical sectors so why they didn't ask their suppliers for ppe is the real question that should be asked. They are also very experienced with seasonal illnesses in care homes (norovirus, seasonal flu...) where they have isolation and protection procedures. Why weren't they implemented ?


Agreed some homes are council run but again they have the same links / contacts and procedures so why were they not better prepared as an organisation ?


It may be a very black and white view but it is a question that isn't being asked, instead the media have whipped up a frenzy pointing fingers at the government over care home deaths.

The cynical side of me also thinks that there may be a collective sigh of relief by relatives who are no longer paying up to 8 grand a month to have someone looked after because the family couldn't or wouldn't. (Just my opinion here)


So my answer to the question is and based on the fact that the advisers and advice given would be the same "yes, as fit as any other PM would be in the same situation of a global pandemic that no one saw coming"

I'm willing to bet any other Prime Minister (even if it was Jeremy Hunt instead of Boris Johnson) would have been at those earlier Cobra meetings and would have taken the threat more seriously


Another Prime Minister would have taken the advice of scientists etc more seriously an, critically, they would have observed what was happening in other countries and heeded the warnings and advice from there as well


Another Prime Minister wouldn't have been advised NOT to shake hands and then go on television to advise the nation he would be shaking hands


It's a horrble situation for any government to face but the notion that noone could have done better than Johnson beggars belief, frankly

No-One knows- and it was oh so predictable that a Momentum-inspired bs thread would be created on here. The arrogance of you people thinking you know better than anyone else. AND we should maybe have followed the example of germany -a country that followed a nationalistic path (what else is new!) and we were disadvantaged from day 1

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/16/world/europe/coronavirus-antibody-test-uk.html

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a horrble situation for any government to

> face but the notion that noone could have done

> better than Johnson beggars belief, frankly



Although this discussion is all based on speculation and theory as no one else is actually prime minister so it's easy to point fingers at Boris. If someone else was prime minister my feeling is that they would make just as many , but possibly not the same ones

Spartacus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It's a horrble situation for any government to

> > face but the notion that noone could have done

> > better than Johnson beggars belief, frankly

>

>

> Although this discussion is all based on

> speculation and theory as no one else is actually

> prime minister so it's easy to point fingers at

> Boris. If someone else was prime minister my

> feeling is that they would make just as many , but

> possibly not the same ones



But he was very divisive on his way to power - but then Theresa May also ended up being divisive by being indecisive. DO we have any leaders who could being consensus?.

Being offered advice by science and choosing whether to take it, are two different things. Government is engaged in balancing public health vs economy and given that different political parties have different views on what matters most within an economy, it is only logical to argue that a different party or different leadership for that matter, may have had a different approach. Whether or not that would have led to different outcomes is unknowable.


Boris himself said in an interview that he did not take the virus seriously enough in the beginning. HE said that. He also said that getting in and almost dying is what made him realise he was wrong. That is pretty clear for everyone to comprehend. We have the highest death toll in Europe for a reason. We need to understand why.


My view is this. We have been impacted in exactly the same ways as every country that failed to respond fast enough in the beginning. We are seeing the same trajectories as everywhere else, with the same spread of age and demographic impact. There is only one differential. The speed and extent of response between countries. Lives absolutely could have been saved with an earlier response and better preparation. At the same time, lives absolutely were saved by the speed with which the NHS was geared up. But that all should have happened earlier. Lack of national stocks of PPE (something that should be in place at all times) absolutely lies at this government's door. They directed funding away from maintaining those supplies into no deal Brexit preparations. There is no getting away from that.

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Cat is many things. But anywhere close to

> being a momentum supporter? As if

>

> What a post glen. Amazing. (Not in a good way)


Unc is so wrapped up in his racist/xenophobic culture war that any post he perceives as being negative to 'his side' must automatically be on the 'other side'. Subjectivity has long since left the building.

In 20 years time he'll be discovered ranting away in some dark, dingy corner of the web, like a 21st Century version of a holed-up Viet Cong hiding in the jungle still fighting the Americans...

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The Cat is many things. But anywhere close to

> > being a momentum supporter? As if

> >

> > What a post glen. Amazing. (Not in a good way)

>

> Unc is so wrapped up in his racist/xenophobic

> culture war that any post he perceives as being

> negative to 'his side' must automatically be on

> the 'other side'. Subjectivity has long since left

> the building.

> In 20 years time he'll be discovered ranting away

> in some dark, dingy corner of the web, like a 21st

> Century version of a holed-up Viet Cong hiding in

> the jungle still fighting the Americans...



It's funny you know. I took a bit of care to make sure the OP was worded as neutrally as possible. And also make clear that I was specifically talking about his health, not anything else.


But people on both 'sides' read something not in 100percent agreement with their own view...and conclude it must be from the 'other' side.....


Seph....who knew I was a closet momentum activist?:)...not even me apparently....

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Being offered advice by science and choosing

> whether to take it, are two different things.

> Government is engaged in balancing public health

> vs economy and given that different political

> parties have different views on what matters most

> within an economy, it is only logical to argue

> that a different party or different leadership for

> that matter, may have had a different approach.

> Whether or not that would have led to different

> outcomes is unknowable.

>

> Boris himself said in an interview that he did not

> take the virus seriously enough in the beginning.

> HE said that. He also said that getting in and

> almost dying is what made him realise he was

> wrong. That is pretty clear for everyone to

> comprehend. We have the highest death toll in

> Europe for a reason. We need to understand why.

>

> My view is this. We have been impacted in exactly

> the same ways as every country that failed to

> respond fast enough in the beginning. We are

> seeing the same trajectories as everywhere else,

> with the same spread of age and demographic

> impact. There is only one differential. The speed

> and extent of response between countries. Lives

> absolutely could have been saved with an earlier

> response and better preparation. At the same time,

> lives absolutely were saved by the speed with

> which the NHS was geared up. But that all should

> have happened earlier. Lack of national stocks of

> PPE (something that should be in place at all

> times) absolutely lies at this government's door.

> They directed funding away from maintaining those

> supplies into no deal Brexit preparations. There

> is no getting away from that.


Spot on!

How the bloody hell can you title something 'Is Boris Fit To Lead' on the East Dulwich Forum and not expect lefty anti-government comments- for heaven's sake ED is the heart of champagne socialist London or hadn't you noticed....it was deliberate- and if it wasn't ...no- it was deliberate.

Anyway as someone pointed out -Boris was out jogging (in this heat he should get a medal)....and I'm sure he is on Doctor's orders

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> diable rouge Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sephiroth Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > The Cat is many things. But anywhere close

> to

> > > being a momentum supporter? As if

> > >

> > > What a post glen. Amazing. (Not in a good

> way)

> >

> > Unc is so wrapped up in his racist/xenophobic

> > culture war that any post he perceives as being

> > negative to 'his side' must automatically be on

> > the 'other side'. Subjectivity has long since

> left

> > the building.

> > In 20 years time he'll be discovered ranting

> away

> > in some dark, dingy corner of the web, like a

> 21st

> > Century version of a holed-up Viet Cong hiding

> in

> > the jungle still fighting the Americans...

>

> > It's funny you know. I took a bit of care to make

> sure the OP was worded as neutrally as possible.

> And also make clear that I was specifically

> talking about his health, not anything else.

>

> But people on both 'sides' read something not in

> 100percent agreement with their own view...and

> conclude it must be from the 'other' side.....

>

> Seph....who knew I was a closet momentum

> activist?:)...not even me apparently....


It's the term 'fit', we use 'fit' for sports people. Is he or she fit enough to play this weekend. Otherwise fit will be are they capable of the job - it the England manager fit to control the national team? Otherwise we'd say are they well enough to come back to work. Ironically all the issues you have raised with BoJo's fitness fit (another use) with many of our views that he is not capable. Come on you did tease us. As for his physical fitness it was crazy that he continued when he was so ill. Crazy. The Queen failed in her duty of care to the head of the country, and the country as a whole.

He is demonstrably untrustworthy. At a time of national emergency, you need people to have trust and confidence in the government and the advice it is giving, if they are going to effectively manage the crisis. I'm not sure what you mean by 'fit', but he's not the person I want in charge right now. Still, at least we don't have Trump I guess.

Look...now that this thread has moved on from his health (was that always my intention?:))....yes, mistakes have been made. But not every move they make is disastrous/incompetent/malicious.


I think that whoever was in Gov at this moment would cop a kicking. For Tory haters, it's evidence of their lack of compassion. If labour was in power, labour haters would be kicking them for being economically incompetent.


So really....it's just politics as usual....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...