Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Have been thinking about Wilf(red) and was M's grandfather's middle name.


First born is Reuben. Husband loves Roman but agrees too similar. I like Sam but is my brother's name. We both like Theo but is name of good friend's son and feels a bit weird to 'take' it.


I love Louis, Ned, Milo, Jarvis (!?) but husband has vetoed all, although Milo was his suggestion til he found out about the hot choc drink plus Tweenies character - and also seems to be popular dogs' name.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25387-boys-names/#findComment-573661
Share on other sites

I've got girls so my opinions may not count!


I prefer names that cannot be confused with surnames (e.g. not Bailey or Taylor) and also that are spelt intuitively.


Having encountered endless children as mine growing up and interacting with others at school, clubs, parties, park etc we have never encountered a young boy called Peter. I think this is a sound classic traditional name and probably plenty of Dads / Grandads out there but no younger boys.


Whatever it is your choice and you will have those that love it and those that,unfortunately, cannot hide their disdain - sod them you go for what you and your hubbie agree on.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25387-boys-names/#findComment-573710
Share on other sites

I LOVE unusual boys names even more than I love unusual girls names and am currently struggling with our boy choice for number two as my son's name is my absolute favourite and can't find anything to match it (plus I am totally drawn to names beginning with E but I'm not keen on two Es...).


I commented on the last thread but here are some extra thoughts for Reuben:


Isaac

Sebastian

Josiah

Jonah

Jonas

Silas

Caleb


Also I know a seven year old called Peter, a 20-odd year old and a lovely but sadly deceased dog. Nice name but a little too sedate for me.


Oh and imho NEVER tell anyone your name before baby comes is my big advice! We didn't and I'm so glad because people are not rude when you introduce your newborn baby and just accept it, but pre-birth it's like everyone plays an uncontrollable game of word association (or Mallet's Mallet for kids of the 80s) as soon as you so much as breathe a name you like!! I'll be keeping schtum this time again, if we ever decide!


*edited to say, I know a third human Peter who is 30 and a really good friend, whoops! He did once forget my name though so we're equal!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25387-boys-names/#findComment-573717
Share on other sites

BST our names taste coincides again - i love Silas in particular but husband vetoed that for number 2. Also liked Sirius (as in Harry Potter...)

Josiah is nice, and can be shortened to Jo which I obviously like :)

Strawbs, Euan (diff spelling but same name) was really high on our list for ages too. Really like it as it's Scottish (which I am) but not in an over the top way.

also love marius...

POlly don't worry, I think we were still undecided at this stage last year! It will come to you!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/25387-boys-names/#findComment-573720
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
    • If the Qatari's decide to retaliate then it's all going off...but I suspect the Iranians are hoping for this - one inaccurate missile and the Qatari's may have to. I think the Iranian leadership is working on fast-tracking their own demise and the Americans and Israeli's planning for regime change, maybe with the many political prisoners the Israelis tried to free from the Elvin prison today. What a mess but clearly Iran was becoming a big threat to not only Israel but many of the other Gulf States and was clearly doing scary stuff with nuclear weapons that required action.
    • I can't find any references to an attack on a British base. where do you find one?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...