Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Jim-the-chin! I'm not against the idea of speed bumps. Not very good if the noise is disturbing you. I reckon they should also just completely re-do the dodgy surfacing and then they can also do the speed bumps if residents want them. My other half hates speed bumps but I think peace and quiet is more important. Do you know what other people on the road think?

Worth pointing out in relation to the Goodrich road hold up that it was at 9.15am. How much is going to be in the till at that time of day. Similarly Willow on a weekday afternoon seemed a stupid sort of time and place to hold up. It suggests to me the culprits are not locals that know the area well. Not that that is much comfort I guess.

In five years in E Dul I'd barely seen a yellow board appealing for witnesses, three in three months does suggest something's up at the moment.

shambles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> please - try and post something in a language

> that's universally recognisable.... without caps

> obviously..


What do you mean by this?

If you don't understand this post maybe you should go back 2 primary education

Mikewbate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Perhaps more CRAZY than Nurse

>

> Well said Shambles.


Yes i am a real nurse thankyou

I born and bought up in Dulwich and still live here.

What are you trying to imply?

And who ever is responsible for this site, take notice as i consider what has been written as liable 'without prejudice'

Firstly how do you know that I am shouting?

Secondley I am not the aggressive one

And thirdly this is defamation of character. 'without prejudice' hahahaha

So much for freedom of speech in this Britain. I was only expressing my own opinion.

No wonder nurses are under valued in this country, until people like you need one.

  • Administrator

crazynurse,


Without prejudice (I'm not sure if it useable in a non-confidential way but as you've used it so shall I)


You implied that previous posts were libellous and as you have implied in the public domain and not in private I shall reply in public. May I point out that you have chosen of your own free will a username that contains the word crazy -" crazynurse", therefore implying that you may indeed be a crazy nurse. Whether you chose it in jest or seriousness I do not know and as The Administrator it is not for me to decide and quite frankly I do not care.


You are more than welcome to post your comments and views on this site, as are others but we take it very seriously when people start mentioning libel. I recommend that you email me directly to explain what exactly you think is libellous and I shall take it to our legal advisors for consideration. I must point out that there maybe charges involved if your allegations are incorrect. I you wish to retract you allegation please feel free to do so.


I have also amended your username from CRAZYNURSE to crazynurse


yours

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The tenant's business has already failed. If the landlord doesn't accept it, they can have a vacant property, stand in the queue of creditors, and get paid little or nothing. It's a gamble that the restructuring will work and the tenant will start paying rent again. Commercial properties are often hard to let. 🤷
    • An inquiry will put a huge amount of time and resource into looking at what happened in the past and why it happened and who was responsible and, in a year or two maybe more, a report will be produced and actions may or may not be taken, some of those responsible for bad decisions will already have resigned and moved on.   Given that we now already understand some of the issues that allowed this awful behaviour to continue unchallenged, my concern is less about whether there is an inquiry to examine what happened in the past but about what is being done right now to protect girls and young women from predatory and exploitative men in whatever race or identity they come in. Inquiries examine the past but don't necessarily solve problems and they certainly don't come up with conclusions quickly which is why they can often feel hollow.  I'd rather see perpetrators and those that let the perpetrators act with impunity, actually being prosecuted and an inquiry won't do that.  I suspect that's why some MPs voted against an inquiry. But do feel free to give me examples of inquiries that really made a difference and actually changed things in a timely and effective way.      
    • In recent consultation on further ED CPZ the majority of respondents were against. Fully appreciate you may not live on a road proposed for CPZ. If you are close to that area it is likely you will be affected by parking displacement if the CPZ goes in. I was just curious what James Barber's position on this is? Perhaps he'll come on here and let us know. He was always really good at visiting the forum.
    • huh  angry not at AII i think its  awsome to name n shame them  . as for me being right wing im very proud of it . does that mke yyou mad n get your BIood presure riseing?  sureIy you dont support chiId grooming or do you  ? i mean tommy robinson did teII you This was happening many yeras ago and of course there reaction was the same as yours .IabIed right wing and racist. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...