Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quids,


Agreed, even Tuco as reintroduced while entertaining has been implausible / inconsistent with the character we knew. Trying not to spoil but the resolution of that situation seemed far fetched. Mike has been written more consistently but he was never that entertaining.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My memory is hazy over Mike's relationship with

> Gus. Didn't he work for him as well as Saul?


Think that part of it was poorly explained in BB, but my assumption was that he was on Gus' payroll, and did odd jobs for Saul on the side. I also assumed that Mike was the one who put Saul/Walter in touch with Gus in the first place.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 10 months later...
Got box set as a gift and just watched all of it in a short space of time. Very enjoyable series. Saved reading this thread until now. As for characters, there were so many good ones. I could never bring myself to think Walt was actually bad. I suppose he was but I sort of felt he was doing things for a right reason. Of the more obscure characters, I though Declan was great.

I don't think Walt was ever fully BAD, he always had an arguably good reason for his actions, but he crossed line after line and I guess the point is that you can never go back once you've crossed a line, even when intentions were honourable.



In related news. Better Call Saul, season 2 is now on Netflix.

He arguably had good intentions during the first/second seasons... by the fourth season they had disappeared and he was consumed with greed, and it was pretty hard to see any shred of goodness within him.


Better Call Saul is good... an altogether more lighthearted affair, but have been enjoying it so far.

  • 2 months later...

Both of those are excellent.


Big Love is something a bit different, which I also thought was great. And six feet under is another (these are all HBO).


For comedy, I really enjoyed The Brink.


And my favourite thing recently was The Leftovers, although I know people that didn't get on with it.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Didn't want to start a new thread but I feel

> another box set coming on. I wan't something

> that's finished and was thinking of either The

> Sopranos or The Wire. I've seen some of the latter

> and enjoyed it.

>

> Any suggestions?


I'm in the process of watching the Soprano's (just getting to the end of Series 4). It's definitely worth revisiting.

We're in dire need of a new box-set to binge on. If things go as they are we might have to start talking or something.


Big thumbs-up for BB, Saul, Battlestar, Making a Murderer and Narcos.


Got bored with House of Cards, aborted Fargo and OITNB very quickly. Not interested in jumper-wearing detective-noir (or re-makes), comedy or anything to do with superheroes.


What?s left?


Advice welcome - before I switch of the ?5.99/month tap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...